C3 Tech/Performance V8 Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Basic Tech and Maintenance for the C3 Corvette
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

C3 Curb Weight

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 2, 2009 | 06:01 AM
  #1  
qboy's Avatar
qboy
Thread Starter
Racer
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 270
Likes: 1
From: So CaL
Default C3 Curb Weight

For such a small vehicle, the C3 vette's seem to have a heavy curb weight. Why do they weigh so much? Frame? Body?
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2009 | 06:09 AM
  #2  
hunt4cleanair's Avatar
hunt4cleanair
Le Mans Master
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,235
Likes: 898
From: Myrtle Beach SC
Default

Originally Posted by qboy
For such a small vehicle, the C3 vette's seem to have a heavy curb weight. Why do they weigh so much? Frame? Body?
Its probably several factors including those you've listed. I suspect though that since its design dates back to the mid-60's, engineering did not get into "weight saving" measures until the mid to late 70's when lowered horsepower due to fuel mileage, emission regulations caused the dimenishing hp output to make it a sluggish performer.

So add to the list the weight of emission control devices, safety devices and improved mileage standards added equipment with no measures taken to cut weight. It wasn't until the 80 models when alloys were introduced to begin to bring weight down.

Model year 1978 weighed the most. Dave McLellan's book Corvette from the Inside gets into this somewhat and talks about these measures and how engineering hours were spent not on performance, but meeting the growing list of regulations for emissions, safety and fuel mileage.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2009 | 07:51 AM
  #3  
jb78L-82's Avatar
jb78L-82
Le Mans Master
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,441
Likes: 963
From: Tennessee/Rhode Island
Default

The C3 Vettes are heavier than you would think and most of that heft is in the frame that actually is more like a truck frame required because of the fiberglass body in those days. The good new is that the cars really are not that heavy compared to many cars today at around 3480 lbs for the 78/79's although the early C3's are not much lighter at around 3,200-3,300 lbs and even the later C3's. Better news is that lightening the C3's is realtive easy if you have the time, money, and inclination by replacing the 50 Lb rear steel spring with an 8 lb composite, aluminum wheels (if you have steel wheels), dumping the very heavy monolith cat for no cat at all, dumping the AIR pump and hardware, shorty headers instead of the heavy cast iron manifolds, aluminum water pump, aluminum intake (L-82's was aluminum from the factory on later years), aluminum tubular upper and lower control arms, aluminum radiator, eliminating the A/C compressor if you are so inclined, etc. You can shed lots of weight pretty fast and don't have an original engine and decide to put on a set of aluminum heads you can pretty quickly get under the weight of the current C6. I have done many of these weight saving measures and the difference is like driving alone versus a 200 lb passenger sitting next me. I am sure that there many forum members who can attest to even greater weight savings.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2009 | 08:13 AM
  #4  
BKarol's Avatar
BKarol
Melting Slicks
Veteran: Army
20 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,223
Likes: 666
From: Northeast
Default

In looking through some information on the 78, one source listed some weight add ons:

Power windows = 8lbs
Floor Mats =4lbs
Rear Window defogger 1lb
Air Conditioning 67lbs
Tilt steering wheel 2lbs
Heavy duty battery 5lbs
Power antenna 4lbs
Push button radio 13lbs
Speed & cruise 6lbs

Get rid of these unnecessay items and you save 110 lbs.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2009 | 08:20 AM
  #5  
jb78L-82's Avatar
jb78L-82
Le Mans Master
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,441
Likes: 963
From: Tennessee/Rhode Island
Default

That is excellent info! I always said whoever bought my 78 originally must have been really serious about performance since the only options were L-82, 4 speed, A/C, Gymkhana suspension, sport mirrors, Am/Fm/8 track. and aluminum wheels. No Tilt, no power door locks, no power windows, no rear defogger, no power antenna, no cruise!
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2009 | 07:06 AM
  #6  
Bee Jay's Avatar
Bee Jay
Safety Car
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,960
Likes: 573
From: Lompoc, CA. Santa Barbara County
Default

What year is your car? I saved over 100lbs removing the front battering ram/vacuum reservoir and rear battering ram. The car will no longer survive 5 mph impacts damage free. Check my signature. I also saved 44 lbs by switching to lightweight Wilwood brake calipers. Defiinitely replace the heavy rear steel spring with a fiberglass version. Alluminum heads and intake manifold and headers will lose weight and add horsepower. I replaced my spare tire with a AAA card. My batwing mod saved about 35 lbs. An aftermarket aluminum gear drive starter saved quite a few pounds too, I forgot how much. I'd like to get my '79 down to 3000 lbs someday. I think an aftermarket hood is my next project. I wish someone would make a quality pexiglass rear window for the 78-82 cars. I hear that back window is heavy.
Bee Jay

Last edited by Bee Jay; Jan 3, 2009 at 02:07 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2009 | 11:47 AM
  #7  
early shark's Avatar
early shark
Melting Slicks
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,672
Likes: 6
From: Nevada City California
Default

My current stock configured '71 LS6 coupe weighs 3340 lbs certified on scales. This was with thee original 5 Goodyear tires also. Options on this car included N37, N40, J50, U69/79, PT7.
These cars are fairly light considering other musclecars, my '69 L78 SS Camaro convertible weighed 3640 lbs. My '70 Challenger RT/SE 440 weighed 3840 lbs.
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2009 | 05:16 PM
  #8  
brngrhd's Avatar
brngrhd
Racer
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 364
Likes: 1
From: Dane Wisconsin
Default

Originally Posted by early shark
My current stock configured '71 LS6 coupe weighs 3340 lbs certified on scales. This was with thee original 5 Goodyear tires also. Options on this car included N37, N40, J50, U69/79, PT7.
These cars are fairly light considering other musclecars, my '69 L78 SS Camaro convertible weighed 3640 lbs. My '70 Challenger RT/SE 440 weighed 3840 lbs.

can you tell me what those codes are? trying to figure out about what my car might weigh. 69 alum headed tripower big block auto no p/s p/b nothing.... alum rad
Reply
Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

 Brett Foote
story-5

Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

 Michael S. Palmer
story-8

2027 Corvette vs The World: Every C8 vs Its Closest Competitor

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

10 Most Common Corvette Problems of the Last 20 Years!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Jan 3, 2009 | 06:34 PM
  #9  
NHRalph's Avatar
NHRalph
Racer
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 306
Likes: 0
From: New Hampshire
Default

The 1978 seems to weigh the most at 3572, followed by the 79, at 3503, the 69 weighed 3245. Figures taken from the Corvette Black Book. There is a lot of steel in a Corvette. Even the doors have a metal frame in them. I was suprised to learn how much more my 77 weighed then my 1986.
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2009 | 10:02 PM
  #10  
Young69Owner's Avatar
Young69Owner
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 0
From: Henrico VA
Default

Dodges are always heavy. I've seen quite a few over 4,000 lbs.

Originally Posted by early shark
My current stock configured '71 LS6 coupe weighs 3340 lbs certified on scales. This was with thee original 5 Goodyear tires also. Options on this car included N37, N40, J50, U69/79, PT7.
These cars are fairly light considering other musclecars, my '69 L78 SS Camaro convertible weighed 3640 lbs. My '70 Challenger RT/SE 440 weighed 3840 lbs.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2009 | 12:25 AM
  #11  
73, Dark Blue 454's Avatar
73, Dark Blue 454
Melting Slicks
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 10
From: Austin TX
Default

I have two 73's and I agree, these cars are heavy,..heavier than my first gen Camaros. You'd think a fiberglass two-seater would come in lighter, but,..

On one of the cars I'm trying to take out 350 lbs (10%). Here's what I've done so far:

Auto to manual tranny: 50 lbs
70 doors: 28 lbs (documented with scales vs. 73 doors)
Alum heads: 40 lbs
Alum L-36 intake: 15 lbs
Headers: 15 lbs
Mini-starter: 5 lbs
Evap removal: 5 lbs
A.I.R and EGR removal: 20 lbs
Aluminun wheels: 30 lbs
Spare tire removal: 50 (yes, I know a spare helps if I'm rear-ended)
Jack removal: 10 lbs
Fiberglass rear leaf spring: 35 lbs
Aluminum radiator: 5 lbs
Removal of undercoating and sound deadening material in the interior: 15 lbs (at least; Chevy must have used 5 gallons of this stuff per car)

All that, and I still maintain power windows, AC, power brakes & steer, factory AM/FM Stereo, and full "deluxe" interior.

I wish somebody would make and sell an aluminum battering ram,..I'd be first in line.

Good luck!

Last edited by 73, Dark Blue 454; Jan 4, 2009 at 12:30 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2009 | 08:52 AM
  #12  
jb78L-82's Avatar
jb78L-82
Le Mans Master
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,441
Likes: 963
From: Tennessee/Rhode Island
Default

Just an FYI that a full optioned 78/79 indeed weigh the most but you need to know what options the cars had to really know the weight or get the car weighted as some above have done. For example, a 78 with an L-82 4 spd aluminum wheels, no A/C, aluminum intake from the factory, no power any thing versus an L-48 with Steel wheels, loaded with every option, and an automatic can weigh as much as 150 pounds less than the L-48 of the sames year. Add a few other reductions that many people have done like the rear spring, cat removal, AIR pump removal, etc and there goes another 100 pounds. Pretty quickly the car is at the weight of a C4/C5 vette (3,200-3,300lbs). I am actually more surprised that the C4/C5's are not lighter (I know why) and should have been. The C6's finally were on more of a diet.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2009 | 09:28 AM
  #13  
mrvette's Avatar
mrvette
Team Owner
Active Streak: 120 Days
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 65,492
Likes: 230
From: Orange Park Florida
Default

For all it's mods my car weighs a even 3300 lbs....surprisingly heavy I was 200 lbs disappointed.....

the muncie went for a 200 4r, the SBC now has aluminum heads/headers, plastic rear spring, but for all the changes, the weight is about the same, maybe 100 lbs lighter...if that....

crazy,.....course I did ADD power windows...but that'a 10 lbs motor per side....woopie doo....

I put that much weight on my lard *** over the last 15 years too.....
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2009 | 09:39 AM
  #14  
Bee Jay's Avatar
Bee Jay
Safety Car
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,960
Likes: 573
From: Lompoc, CA. Santa Barbara County
Default

Originally Posted by mrvette
I put that much weight on my lard *** over the last 15 years too.....
I heard that. I was 21 and weighed 165lbs soaking wet when I bought my car new in 1979, now I'm 51 and pushing 240lbs. I resolve to lose 29 lbs in 2009. 29 in 2009, that's my motto. I gotta go, my cinamin roll and coffee should be ready.
Bee Jay
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2009 | 03:40 PM
  #15  
JDemp's Avatar
JDemp
Advanced
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 82
Likes: 1
From: Portsmouth Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by 73, Dark Blue 454
I have two 73's and I agree, these cars are heavy,..heavier than my first gen Camaros. You'd think a fiberglass two-seater would come in lighter, but,..

On one of the cars I'm trying to take out 350 lbs (10%). Here's what I've done so far:

Auto to manual tranny: 50 lbs
70 doors: 28 lbs (documented with scales vs. 73 doors)
Alum heads: 40 lbs
Alum L-36 intake: 15 lbs
Headers: 15 lbs
Mini-starter: 5 lbs
Evap removal: 5 lbs
A.I.R and EGR removal: 20 lbs
Aluminun wheels: 30 lbs
Spare tire removal: 50 (yes, I know a spare helps if I'm rear-ended)
Jack removal: 10 lbs
Fiberglass rear leaf spring: 35 lbs
Aluminum radiator: 5 lbs
Removal of undercoating and sound deadening material in the interior: 15 lbs (at least; Chevy must have used 5 gallons of this stuff per car)

All that, and I still maintain power windows, AC, power brakes & steer, factory AM/FM Stereo, and full "deluxe" interior.

I wish somebody would make and sell an aluminum battering ram,..I'd be first in line.

Good luck!


I have alum heads, a man tran, a fiber spring, non stock cats ETC on my 76, I totally missed the 50lb spare tire. I'll have to pull it and see if I can tell a difference. Its not like I drive it to work!

Have to go with steel on the battering ram though! A little more weight is a good thing as long as you don't have to run to far with it.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2009 | 04:32 PM
  #16  
panic's Avatar
panic
Team Owner
20 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
Photogenic
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 20,706
Likes: 25
From: Sorrento Italy
Default

My '77 is at 2.750lbs at moment and i didn't finish yet...

My target is get to 2.600lbs, the only problem is that the more you go down in weight the more costly becomes each lb you shave from the car...
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2009 | 05:47 PM
  #17  
roscobbc's Avatar
roscobbc
Drifting
20 Year Member
Active Streak: 30 Days
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,527
Likes: 148
From: East London/SW Essex UK
Default

Originally Posted by panic
My '77 is at 2.750lbs at moment and i didn't finish yet...

My target is get to 2.600lbs, the only problem is that the more you go down in weight the more costly becomes each lb you shave from the car...
Better make sure then Panic that you visit the small room before taking the car out - must save a pound or two
Reply

Get notified of new replies

To C3 Curb Weight

Old Jan 5, 2009 | 01:41 AM
  #18  
panic's Avatar
panic
Team Owner
20 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
Photogenic
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 20,706
Likes: 25
From: Sorrento Italy
Default

Originally Posted by roscobbc
Better make sure then Panic that you visit the small room before taking the car out - must save a pound or two
...A pound or two?????!!!


Last edited by panic; Jan 5, 2009 at 09:06 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2009 | 08:14 AM
  #19  
GrandSportC3's Avatar
GrandSportC3
Team Owner
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 182,997
Likes: 88
From: Lakeland, FL
Cruise-In IV-V-VI-VII-VIII Veteran
St. Jude Donor '03, '06, '17
Default

My Race '68 Vert has 2750 lbs dry weight and that's with a full cage and interior (except for the passenger seat)..

There's lots of weight saving potential on C3's.. As others posted, early C3's were a lot lighter due to less safety requirements.. They added steel beams to the doors, the reinforced front and rear 5 mph bumpers were heavy too. All the accessories (i.e. A/C etc) added some additional weight..
A lot of the weight is also in the wheels.. Even the factory aluminum wheels were fairly heavy.. I took over 100 lbs off the car just by changing wheels & tires. Factory seats are very heavy too except for the '80 - '82 style fiberglass shell seats.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2009 | 07:06 PM
  #20  
mrvette's Avatar
mrvette
Team Owner
Active Streak: 120 Days
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 65,492
Likes: 230
From: Orange Park Florida
Default

Pay attention to Panic's/GSC3' posts, they have worked hard to get cars down there....and have anything close to a stockish car...

but not to feel so badly, as any other car of similar vintage and power has nearly the same weights....stock....

Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:08 AM.

story-0
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

Slideshow: From C1 to C8 we compare every Corvette generation by the numbers.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 16:54:12


VIEW MORE
story-1
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

Slideshow: Some Corvette pace cars became collectible legends, while others perfectly captured the look and attitude of their era.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-11 09:50:51


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

Slideshow: Ranking the top 10 Corvette engines by torque output.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:58:09


VIEW MORE
story-3
Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

Slideshow: A Corvette pace car nearly matching IndyCar speeds sounds exaggerated, until you look at the numbers.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-04 20:03:36


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

Among a rather large group of them.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:56:44


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

Slideshow: the top 10 things Corvette owners want in the C9 Corvette

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-30 12:41:15


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

Slideshow: 10 Important Corvette 'firsts' that every fan should know.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 17:02:16


VIEW MORE
story-7
5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

Slideshow: Should you buy a 2020-2026 Corvette or wait for 2027?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-22 10:08:58


VIEW MORE
story-8
2027 Corvette vs The World: Every C8 vs Its Closest Competitor

Slideshow: 2027 Corvette lineup vs the world.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-24 16:12:42


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Common Corvette Problems of the Last 20 Years!

Slideshow: 10 major Corvette problems from the last 20 years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-14 16:37:05


VIEW MORE