When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
You guys are wimps on adjusting the rockers!
I have run a solid cam for years and the adjustment on them is way overstated. I adjust them every spring and maybe find one or two that is a coupe of thou out. I love tinkering with it also. The solid adjustment certainly would not keep me from running solids. Even if it meant every 1000 miles it would be no big deal. As far as the noise from the solids it is music to me. At idle to the untrained ear most think the motor is coming apart. Once you get into the throttle you can't hear anything but motor anyway. A DD I would run hyd. cam but for the weekend fun toy why not solids.
Now you have me thinking of solid roller. Do the lifters cost $500?
Bee Jay
Lifters are more expensive than the cam. I just happen to have a Comp XR286R, 577 intake lift, .583 exhaust lift. 286/292 advertised duration, 248/254 duration at .050", 110 LSA, small base circle brand new in the box I'd take $200 for.
You guys are wimps on adjusting the rockers!
I have run a solid cam for years and the adjustment on them is way overstated. I adjust them every spring and maybe find one or two that is a coupe of thou out. I love tinkering with it also. The solid adjustment certainly would not keep me from running solids. Even if it meant every 1000 miles it would be no big deal. As far as the noise from the solids it is music to me. At idle to the untrained ear most think the motor is coming apart. Once you get into the throttle you can't hear anything but motor anyway. A DD I would run hyd. cam but for the weekend fun toy why not solids.
Well,this car you are working on will be like a daily driver ,right?If not then you have answered you own question,throw a solid roller in and be done with it
I just got back from a ride in mine. I still like the rpm that the motor can make. Sounds like I'm leaning towards a solid roller. Less duration more lift and a little wider lobe seperation.
I can't go to mild on the duration, I'll run into problems running pump gas.
From what we talked about your on the right track with a solid roller, I know your driving habits and with the FI less duration wil help in the low to mid range where you do most of your "spirited driving" anyway. Your current combo pulls like a beast now so any improvement is going to improve your driveability. Widen the LS to say 112-114, I don't think you'll loose too much on the top end, and as someone suggested alittle head work will help.....your killing me....
Your not going to lose any power up top unless you cut way back on the duration, automatic wider power band with the roller a 114 LSA will stretch the power band up higher even more.
just my 2 cents worth, with all the gearing you have with the 5 speed manual trans 3.70 rear gearing, I would not even consider going any lower then 245 .050. use a 114 LSA to keep the computer happy running the fuel injection. unless your really unhappy now with your power range with 252 .050 don't go drastic cut all the teeth out of your ride, you have all kinds of gearing for torque.
Last edited by Little Mouse; Jul 10, 2009 at 01:10 AM.
I think I have settled on a solid roller. 242/248 @ .050. Lift with a 1.5 is at .570/.576. No need to go higher with these heads, they don't flow any better from .500 to .600. The LSA will be a 112. This will be a custom grind billit cam. I talked to Comp Cams and the yactually wanted to go a little larger on the duration. This one should provide good performance and keep the O2 sensors happy with a lot less overlap.
I think I have settled on a solid roller. 242/248 @ .050. Lift with a 1.5 is at .570/.576. No need to go higher with these heads, they don't flow any better from .500 to .600. The LSA will be a 112. This will be a custom grind billit cam. I talked to Comp Cams and the yactually wanted to go a little larger on the duration. This one should provide good performance and keep the O2 sensors happy with a lot less overlap.
...
Last edited by Billysvette; Aug 18, 2009 at 09:24 PM.
From: Who says "Nothing is impossible" ? I've been doing nothing for years.
There is one hydraulic roller that has always mystified me. It is the Comp Cams 280HT.
With only 230deg duration it get .560" lift with 1.6 rockers you are near .600" lift with no reduction in lift because of valve lash a solid roller would have. It is the Magnum 286HR.
It has more lift with the same duration as solid ( street ) rollers. Someone here is running it an loves it
There is one hydraulic roller that has always mystified me. It is the Comp Cams 280HT.
With only 230deg duration it get .560" lift with 1.6 rockers you are near .600" lift with no reduction in lift because of valve lash a solid roller would have. It is the Magnum 286HR.
It has more lift with the same duration as solid ( street ) rollers. Someone here is running it an loves it
I was a little afraid to go to short on duration because of detonation. With 242 on a solid it is about 234 on a hyd roller due to valve lash. On the solids you have to take away 1 degree of duration for every .002 of lash or close to it. It is tough to compare hyd and solids of the same duration. Comp Cams actually wanted me to run 248/254 @ .050 duration on a solid roller. I thought this might be a little much and push the power band up with more rpm. This setup should make good power to 7000 rpm if my heads will flow enough. I'll have to put it on the dyno to be sure about it.
Ah. Now I see why you were having trouble with FI and a lumpy idle.
Mass Air systems are great in the sense that you can basically drive it with no tuning - the downside is that you can't tune-out issues like a rough idle or lots of overlap up through 2500. On my megasquirt, I can ask for closed loop O2 feedback only in cruise rpm/load areas.
From: Who says "Nothing is impossible" ? I've been doing nothing for years.
Originally Posted by Gordonm
I was a little afraid to go to short on duration because of detonation. With 242 on a solid it is about 234 on a hyd roller due to valve lash. On the solids you have to take away 1 degree of duration for every .002 of lash or close to it. It is tough to compare hyd and solids of the same duration. Comp Cams actually wanted me to run 248/254 @ .050 duration on a solid roller. I thought this might be a little much and push the power band up with more rpm. This setup should make good power to 7000 rpm if my heads will flow enough. I'll have to put it on the dyno to be sure about it.
I thought you were concerned about overlap with the computer. That cam 248/254 is what I have in my 427ci small block, you wanna talk overlap ? ? ?
I thought you were concerned about overlap with the computer. That cam 248/254 is what I have in my 427ci small block, you wanna talk overlap ? ? ?
This is why I am going down to the 242/248 with a 112 LSA. The overlap should be in the low 20s instead of the high 30s where I am now. I did not say it was perfect but I don't want ot go to short and detonate or not have any power in the upper rpms.
Just because your heads don't increase in flow doesn't mean that you need to stop the lift. higher lift = more time at max flow. You have to remember that as rpm rise you start talking about 1/1000 of a sec of total valve open time. That is why you see a very fast drop off in power at some higher rpm. Increasing the head flow potential puts the quick drop off at a higher rpm. It is a simple math formula to fill a cylinder. Time of open valve or duration X rpm, head flow in CFM at each valve lift number, how much time the valve spends at each lift height. That is why a steep ramp solid cam can flow so much more when compared to it's small lobed H-flat cam or even a h-roller