When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
ok for my curiosity i have some cam specs for the LS3, LS5, LS6, L88 and ZL1/LS7 cam and have been playing around with them on an dyno progem to see the power gains and stuff with my friend just for some educated guesses.
i have been getting close to the rated HP from the LS5, LS6 and L88 for the most part.
but the LS7 cam um is not doing what i wold exspect it to do it droop the power down to 356 HP at 6000 RPM compared to the LS6s cams 418 at 6000 RPM.
i am keeping every thing constant except the cams why the big droop of power.
Your information is incorrect.. The LS7 used an even hotter cam than the L88. Most think the L88 and the ZL1 cam are the same. Truth is they aren't even close. The ZL1 cam is much hotter than the L88 and that is the cam that was found in the LS7's. HP is probably a little over 600 HP at over 7000 RPMs.
I have the cam specs if you want them..
edit: I reread your post.. What is the power output above 7000 rpms? Also, you have to remember that there are alot of factors that the your dyno calc cant take into consideration.. It all has to do with the heads and how well the flow. For most of the engines that you've dynoed the use close chamber heads. The LS7 should be open chamber which helps out alot at the higher rpm..
Wally since we are talkin about compression... I was curious as to what compression the second design L88's ran. If I am not mistaken, the second design L88 ran open chamber heads and the ZL1 580/620 cam.. Also, just to refresh my memory where the valves 2.19/1.88's or 2.19/1.84's
It also dropped a 1/4 point in compression with the open chamber heads so where is the higher compression? .
L88, .12.5
LS7, .12 1/4
Ever hear one? The real thing....
I was responding to the previous posters comment that most of the engines listed were closed chamber (LS3, LS5, LS6) which were lower compression than the LS7.
Dyno Sims are "crap in, crap out". You need to feed actual correct info in to get good results. I was wondering why the power numbers were so low. Try inputing actual compression ratios. These cams will have minimal DCR with 9.5 to 1 compression. The bigger cam will have a power drop @ 9.5 to 1 compression. The LS7 "ticked" from the combination of HP parts, compression, cam duration, carburation all being well matched for it's intended use.....Racing!
well with an 12.25:1 Cr 800 CFM Carb. and small tube headers with muffs it gets 533 HP at 6500 RPM. the heads flow 361 at .600 intake 284 .600 exhaust.
Dyno Sims are "crap in, crap out". You need to feed actual correct info in to get good results.
To get more realistic numbers out of DD2000 you have to input a custom head flow with all the CFM at at .100 lift incriments. you have to use true static compression not the pulled out the GM *** numbers. you have to input from the cam card the true .050 duration and valve lift numbers.
To get more realistic numbers out of DD2000 you have to input a custom head flow with all the CFM at at .100 lift incriments. you have to use true static compression not the pulled out the GM *** numbers. you have to input from the cam card the true .050 duration and valve lift numbers.
i am using dyno2003 and i can do that or even in .050 increments
i dont have the specs for the LS7 heads ie how they flowed.
well with an 12.25:1 Cr 800 CFM Carb. and small tube headers with muffs it gets 533 HP at 6500 RPM. the heads flow 361 at .600 intake 284 .600 exhaust.
My bud had a real LS-7 in a 69 vette back in the day.
Hooker header-sidepipes with little restriction-->read LOUD, & an 850 Holley, shifted at 7,200-7,400 with a M-20 & 4:10 gears on Racemaster Cheaters. The one & only time the car ever saw a drag strip it ran an 11:87 (wish I could remember the mph, sucks to get old) thru the sidepipes
I've seen dyno's indicating upper 500s for that combo.
Was hard on rear ends & fuel...in that order!
From: Who says "Nothing is impossible" ? I've been doing nothing for years.
Originally Posted by 63mako
Try it with large tube headers no mufflers.
A true engine dyno test they are not going to be using mufflers. Whole point is to see how much HP the motor alone is making, not how much it is losing through mufflers and other accessories.
If it is a good shop they will have stepped race headers but I usually use large tube headers with no mufflers on my DD simulations.
A true engine dyno test they are not going to be using mufflers. Whole point is to see how much HP the motor alone is making, not how much it is losing through mufflers and other accessories.
If it is a good shop they will have stepped race headers but I usually use large tube headers with no mufflers on my DD simulations.
This I know. But the OP is running his simulations with small tube headers and mufflers.