C3 Tech/Performance V8 Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Basic Tech and Maintenance for the C3 Corvette
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Dyno'd today.....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 6, 2009 | 09:49 AM
  #21  
gkull's Avatar
gkull
Team Owner
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 21,953
Likes: 1,444
From: Reno Nevada
2024 C3 of the Year Finalist- Modified
Default

Originally Posted by 1970-Bronze
Ok, the Performer EPS was used because of the hood height on the early C3's. I am running the LT-1 drop base and 3" filter.So I think there a little room to give but not much without placing the air fliter lid close to the top of the carb.

Gkull - any recommendations on intakes?


Tim
The K&N dropped base open element is a nice unit designed for maximum drop. I have hood clearance problems also. So I took out my 3X14 filter and installed the 2X14 with the lighter weight filtered top to keep the possible air flow high as possible.

As for one of the better dual plane intake manifolds. My choice is the Weiand Stealth with a 1/2 inch wood 4 hole spacer. all of these from summit racing.
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2009 | 11:49 AM
  #22  
billla's Avatar
billla
Le Mans Master
Supporting Lifetime
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 6,231
Likes: 65
From: Seattle WA
St. Jude Donor '14
Default

Originally Posted by 1970-Bronze
I double checked the carb and it is an 800 cfm but 50 cfm isn't going to make a big difference. Everything is plumbed (hard line) for this carb so I'd like to make an attempt with it for now.

I can increase the lift in to the .5xx" range with some 1.6 RR. I suspect this would just be icing on the cake at this moment.

I still think the ignition is suspect. I've had issues with it since I purchased the car. It was points and locked down with no mechanical adjustment. It currently is a PerTronix II. I've had a couple of phone calls with Lars on it.
As noted, you've got more than enough carb. Vacuum secondaries are the right choice unless you're going drag racing. Rule of thumb calcs:

CFM = ((CI x RPM)/3456) x VE

Estimating you'd need to turn 8500 RPM to over-run the carb, and like 4500 in cruise to have the secondaries open in cruise. This is pretty general and always subject for review - but I don't think you need to look at sizing right now. I do think you need to double-check the fuel pressure at the carb if you can plumb a gauge in.

I agree that the rocker change is more of a tune than solving a problem.

I suspect the ignition as well as previously noted. If the distributor is a locked drag distributor you'll want to change it out anyway. And a lousy coil can cause exactly this kind of flat spot as well.

I'd agree that the Performer EPS isn't ideal for this combo, but IMHO it's not the root cause of that kind of power shortfall. There may be 10-15 HP above 4500 or so, but it's not choking off the engine to this extent.

Timing and fuel - I wouldn't make any changes outside of those two until you're making near expected power. Then you can seek perfection
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2009 | 01:25 PM
  #23  
toddalin's Avatar
toddalin
Le Mans Master
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 3
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 8,897
Likes: 1,353
From: Santa Ana CA
Default

Goes a little too rich where it should be making best power. Note the fuel curve after the ~4,500 rpm bump. Also note that the power spikes at the top of the run where it leans out a bit.


Last edited by toddalin; Sep 6, 2009 at 01:27 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2009 | 04:57 PM
  #24  
7T1vette's Avatar
7T1vette
Team Owner
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Top Answer: 5
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 37,637
Likes: 3,114
From: Crossville TN
Default

Just because you have a carb that is rated at 850 cfm, doesn't mean that it is actually doing its job. Borrow another carb and see what happens.
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2009 | 06:16 PM
  #25  
Matt Gruber's Avatar
Matt Gruber
Race Director
Active Streak: 30 Days
Community Influencer
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 14,993
Likes: 79
From: central FL, near the beach.
Default

Originally Posted by gkull
As for one of the better dual plane intake manifolds. My choice is the Weiand Stealth with a 1/2 inch wood 4 hole spacer. all of these from summit racing.
i agree with gkull. That old manifold is maxed out on a 350. e-bay the old manifold and this swap is really low cost. Don't forget the 4 hole spacer!
.
the 1.6 RR is good idea too
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2009 | 11:11 PM
  #26  
1970-Bronze's Avatar
1970-Bronze
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 990
Likes: 0
From: North Texas
Default

Ok, after some investigating......

The timing was at 34º total. I bumped it to 36º and moved to a lighter spring on one of the weights so total advance is ~2600 rpms now. Unfortunately, this has created a low speed transition ping so I need to remove some vac-advance timing and reset everything again.

Now, the primaries were not opening all the way as suspected. So, I re-worked the throttle cable and I believe I have it corrected now. SO, do the Primaries have to be open fully for the secondaries to open ???


Next....

I checked hood clearence for a better intake and may have discovered another issue. I have about 0.8" worst case clearance from the hood to the top of the air cleaner. So, both the Air-Strike and Air-Gap look like they are only 0.46" taller than the EPS. Which would leave me with ~0.3" of clearence. Is that enough?

I also checked the height of the drop base to the lid on an interior measurement and I only have 0.75" worst case. I suspect this is also causing me a loss in horse power. besides moving to a lid with a built in air filter....any ideas?

Tim
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2009 | 01:28 PM
  #27  
Corvettes of Dallas - Parts's Avatar
0Corvettes of Dallas - Parts
Former Vendor
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 857
Likes: 0
From: DFW Texas
Default

Tim

How are you?

Are you considering a different CAM?

-Adam

Corvettes of Dallas
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2009 | 07:44 PM
  #28  
1970-Bronze's Avatar
1970-Bronze
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 990
Likes: 0
From: North Texas
Default

Originally Posted by Corvettes of Dallas - Parts
Tim

How are you?

Are you considering a different CAM?

-Adam

Corvettes of Dallas
Adam - I'm good. Thanks again for having the guys out.

For now, I need to sort out the combo. The cam is not what's holding back the combination. I think I will swap the intake next and possibly the carb. I'm pretty concerned abut the hood clearence to the air cleaner and the air cleaner to the carb clearence. It going to be TIGHT....

Any thoughts?

Tim
Reply
Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

 Brett Foote
story-3

Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-4

10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

2027 Corvette vs The World: Every C8 vs Its Closest Competitor

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

10 Most Common Corvette Problems of the Last 20 Years!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

5 MOST and 5 LEAST Popular Corvette Model Years in History!

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

2027 Corvette Buyer's Guide: Everything You Need to Know!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Sep 10, 2009 | 09:18 PM
  #29  
7T1vette's Avatar
7T1vette
Team Owner
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Top Answer: 5
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 37,637
Likes: 3,114
From: Crossville TN
Default

If you are getting pre-ignition pinging, you have advanced the timing too much. Maybe leave one spring from the original set-up and one from your most recent test in the distributor to optimize the setting. Then set it back to 36 deg. when maxxed out. It may not ping with that setup.

[P.S. I thought you weren't getting a full fuel charge from the carb...]
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2009 | 10:17 PM
  #30  
Imo Apita's Avatar
Imo Apita
Pro
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 576
Likes: 3
Default

**** Disclaimer, I'm a newbie here so don't take this as advice, just an observation******

Been playing with cam software from Comp cams plugging in your set-up:

Highest #'s with the XE274H : 383.1 HP (5000 rpm) 438.8 ftlb (4000rpm)
Lowest #'s with the 252H : 318.6 HP (4000 rpm) 454.5 ftlb (2000 rpm)

The XE 274H 230/236 @ 0.0500 and 0.490/0.490

So one of the questions is the parasitic loss of the TH400.
15-20hp for the PS/fan/waterpump and other goodies,maybe 50-60hp for the trans would give you app. 300rwhp.
So you'd probably have a little to gain with tuning but with my peanut brain I'd say you're in the ballpark.
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2009 | 10:32 PM
  #31  
Hotrod406's Avatar
Hotrod406
Instructor
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
From: South of GR MI
Default

Originally Posted by 1970-Bronze
Ok, after some investigating......

The timing was at 34º total. I bumped it to 36º and moved to a lighter spring on one of the weights so total advance is ~2600 rpms now. Unfortunately, this has created a low speed transition ping so I need to remove some vac-advance timing and reset everything again.

Now, the primaries were not opening all the way as suspected. So, I re-worked the throttle cable and I believe I have it corrected now. SO, do the Primaries have to be open fully for the secondaries to open ???


Next....

I checked hood clearence for a better intake and may have discovered another issue. I have about 0.8" worst case clearance from the hood to the top of the air cleaner. So, both the Air-Strike and Air-Gap look like they are only 0.46" taller than the EPS. Which would leave me with ~0.3" of clearence. Is that enough?

I also checked the height of the drop base to the lid on an interior measurement and I only have 0.75" worst case. I suspect this is also causing me a loss in horse power. besides moving to a lid with a built in air filter....any ideas?

Tim
.300" is plenty of space. If it hits the hood sometimes who cares. It'll just make a little rub mark. My dad has a Performer RPM on his car and it fits ok. It's an LT1 car so it's got the big block hood.

A roller cam would pick you up quite a bit of power but they are expensive. You could keep those same springs I believe. I don't know anyone that has regretted swapping to a roller.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2009 | 08:49 AM
  #32  
1970-Bronze's Avatar
1970-Bronze
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 990
Likes: 0
From: North Texas
Default

Originally Posted by Hotrod406
.300" is plenty of space. If it hits the hood sometimes who cares. It'll just make a little rub mark. My dad has a Performer RPM on his car and it fits ok. It's an LT1 car so it's got the big block hood.

A roller cam would pick you up quite a bit of power but they are expensive. You could keep those same springs I believe. I don't know anyone that has regretted swapping to a roller.
Ok, 0.3" of hood clearence is do-able then. Any thoughts on the air-cleaner base to air cleaner lid at 0.75"? Seems like a choking point but I'm not sure how to correct that and get a better intake at the same time.

The current cam is a HR from Lunati - 227/234 @.050

Tim
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2009 | 08:53 AM
  #33  
1970-Bronze's Avatar
1970-Bronze
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 990
Likes: 0
From: North Texas
Default

Originally Posted by 7T1vette
If you are getting pre-ignition pinging, you have advanced the timing too much. Maybe leave one spring from the original set-up and one from your most recent test in the distributor to optimize the setting. Then set it back to 36 deg. when maxxed out. It may not ping with that setup.

[P.S. I thought you weren't getting a full fuel charge from the carb...]
The pre-ignition is "only" at throttle tip in and I think I can correct it by removing 2º from the vac-advance. I'm going to try this first and see. If it doesn't work, it's not that difficult to change it again.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2009 | 09:12 AM
  #34  
1970-Bronze's Avatar
1970-Bronze
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 990
Likes: 0
From: North Texas
Default

Originally Posted by Imo Apita
**** Disclaimer, I'm a newbie here so don't take this as advice, just an observation******

Been playing with cam software from Comp cams plugging in your set-up:

Highest #'s with the XE274H : 383.1 HP (5000 rpm) 438.8 ftlb (4000rpm)
Lowest #'s with the 252H : 318.6 HP (4000 rpm) 454.5 ftlb (2000 rpm)

The XE 274H 230/236 @ 0.0500 and 0.490/0.490

So one of the questions is the parasitic loss of the TH400.
15-20hp for the PS/fan/waterpump and other goodies,maybe 50-60hp for the trans would give you app. 300rwhp.
So you'd probably have a little to gain with tuning but with my peanut brain I'd say you're in the ballpark.
Well, I might be in agreement but I am running a hydraulic roller cam and would expect the TQ to be higher than your projection. With Desktop Dyno, the numbers come out to ~ 485 ftlb (3000rpm) and 398 hp (5000 rpm) which is probably very optimistic.

Now, even at 300 rwhp, I'm missing that by ~40 rwhp which is a lot at this point.

But keep the ideas coming.....
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2009 | 09:18 AM
  #35  
Hotrod406's Avatar
Hotrod406
Instructor
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
From: South of GR MI
Default

Originally Posted by 1970-Bronze
Well, I might be in agreement but I am running a hydraulic roller cam and would expect the TQ to be higher than your projection. With Desktop Dyno, the numbers come out to ~ 485 ftlb (3000rpm) and 398 hp (5000 rpm) which is probably very optimistic.

Now, even at 300 rwhp, I'm missing that by ~40 rwhp which is a lot at this point.

But keep the ideas coming.....
A roller with less than .500 lift? I didn't know those were available. Definitely get some 1.6 rockers.

Drop-base air cleaners are not the most efficient but it's still better than a crappy intake.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2009 | 09:18 AM
  #36  
larrywalk's Avatar
larrywalk
Melting Slicks
20 Year Member
Veteran: Marine Corps
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,317
Likes: 111
From: St Louis MO
Default

Originally Posted by 1970-Bronze
Ok, after some investigating......

The timing was at 34º total. I bumped it to 36º and moved to a lighter spring on one of the weights so total advance is ~2600 rpms now. Unfortunately, this has created a low speed transition ping so I need to remove some vac-advance timing and reset everything again.
When you say "low speed transition ping", are you meaning at full throttle or partial throttle? It would help if you knew what the vacuum was at this point because the vacuum can go to less than ~6 inches at partial throttle. Further, if the vacuum was less than 6 inches, the vacuum advance would be out of the picture anyway so taking out the vacuum advance won't help. Recommendation: Add a vacuum gauge to a source of intake manifold vacuum so that you can read it when you are driving. You'll be able to correlate it with your observations.

The primaries do not need to be open ALL the way for the secondaries to start to open: There is a hole just underneath the primary venturi which carries the venturi vacuum signal to the vacuum canister, and will pull the secondaries open when the venturi vacuum is high enough to overcome the force applied by the spring in the vacuum canister.

Although there is no linkage requiring the primaries to be fully open, they will be nearly full open, and, of course, the air flow going into the engine must be high enough (high rpm) to create enough of a pressure drop in the primary venturis to pull the actuator open.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2009 | 11:17 AM
  #37  
ajrothm's Avatar
ajrothm
Le Mans Master
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 9,993
Likes: 1,136
From: League City Tx
Default

I would do a compression check and leak down and make sure the motor is healthy. That parts combo is matched up pretty well for a mild street motor....I agree the EPS intake is a restriction but...definetly not 40HP worth. You should definetly be putting more then 260rwhp out....

For comparison sakes,

My original 71' 350/270hp motor(8.5-1) with a 327/350hp cam(L79, 222*@050, 440" lift), stock but cleaned port heads and a 140k mile short block made 200rwhp with a Performer intake, q-junk, and 1 5/8" headers. Just your heads and cam alone would get me to your power level(260-270hp) and thats not even talking about more inches, more compression, FRESH rebuild, better tune etc.... Mine was also going through a stock TH400 and 3.08s. It made 194hp through the dual snorkel air cleaner and stock filter, pulled the lid and it gained 6 rwhp...>LOL

I think once you get the bugs worked out, you should be good for 300-325 rwhp... Remember you have around 25% loss due to the TH400 and IRS.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2009 | 11:31 AM
  #38  
Corvettes of Dallas - Parts's Avatar
0Corvettes of Dallas - Parts
Former Vendor
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 857
Likes: 0
From: DFW Texas
Default

Originally Posted by 1970-Bronze
Adam - I'm good. Thanks again for having the guys out.

For now, I need to sort out the combo. The cam is not what's holding back the combination. I think I will swap the intake next and possibly the carb. I'm pretty concerned abut the hood clearence to the air cleaner and the air cleaner to the carb clearence. It going to be TIGHT....

Any thoughts?

Tim
Interesting! My suggestion would be to pick Sean's brain...

Tight squeeze = Dremel or sand paper?


-Adam
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2009 | 06:14 PM
  #39  
hugie82's Avatar
hugie82
Safety Car
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,652
Likes: 49
From: Bridgewater nj
Default

Pull the aircleaner for the Dyno run and see where you are at. The tip in knock, you can try riching up the idle jets and maybe some octane boost may be needed. Stiffer advance springs will let you set the off idle timing higher so you can get more in at the top. You have plenty of low end grunt but you flatten out to quick. I'd try the cheap stuff before throwing money at it IMHO
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:08 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

Slideshow: Ranking the top 10 Corvette engines by torque output.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:58:09


VIEW MORE
story-1
Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

Slideshow: A Corvette pace car nearly matching IndyCar speeds sounds exaggerated, until you look at the numbers.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-04 20:03:36


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

Among a rather large group of them.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:56:44


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

Slideshow: the top 10 things Corvette owners want in the C9 Corvette

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-30 12:41:15


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

Slideshow: 10 Important Corvette 'firsts' that every fan should know.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 17:02:16


VIEW MORE
story-5
5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

Slideshow: Should you buy a 2020-2026 Corvette or wait for 2027?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-22 10:08:58


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Corvette vs The World: Every C8 vs Its Closest Competitor

Slideshow: 2027 Corvette lineup vs the world.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-24 16:12:42


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Common Corvette Problems of the Last 20 Years!

Slideshow: 10 major Corvette problems from the last 20 years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-14 16:37:05


VIEW MORE
story-8
5 MOST and 5 LEAST Popular Corvette Model Years in History!

Slideshow: 5 most and least popular Corvette model years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-08 13:25:01


VIEW MORE
story-9
2027 Corvette Buyer's Guide: Everything You Need to Know!

Slideshow: 2027 Corvette buyer's guide

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-17 16:41:08


VIEW MORE