When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I just noticed an interesting graph at CorvetteBlogger.Com. It is a GM graph that shows advertised horsepower for all Corvette small-block engines. Wow, since 1996 output has really increased dramatically.
Be aware that the graph is clearly labelled "advertised horsepower". Comparing the pre-1972 output figures with the later ones is erroneous in regard to actually comparing "real" output. Remove ~80 horsepower from the pre-72 (SAE Gross) horsepower figures so that you can compare apples to apples.
The '81's had the lowest available HP of any year. That might explain why mine was so cheap to begin with.
Well, that and everything needing to be rebuilt or replaced. The great thing about an SBC is that you are only limited by your wallet if you want to make that HP number grow.
There was little difference between any 'base' small block Corvette engines from 1971-1982. The biggest differences are due to the HP/torque rating, depending on what rating system was used (SAE-gross vs. SAE-net) and what rpm was selected to measure the "rated HP". Many of those years had base engines that produced significantly higher HP/torque numbers; but you had to crank it beyond the paltry level of RPM selected by the factory for its ratings. This was all due to the insurance industry playing "hard ball" with regard to high power-to-weight ratio production cars and the EPA's entrance into this venue. All 350 cu. in. Chevy engines can be upgraded easily; or they can just be enhanced by optimizing what you already have with simple distributor and carb work.
I just noticed an interesting graph at CorvetteBlogger.Com. It is a GM graph that shows advertised horsepower for all Corvette small-block engines. Wow, since 1996 output has really increased dramatically.
Be aware that the graph is clearly labelled "advertised horsepower". Comparing the pre-1972 output figures with the later ones is erroneous in regard to actually comparing "real" output. Remove ~80 horsepower from the pre-72 (SAE Gross) horsepower figures so that you can compare apples to apples.