When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Your main concern will be if the 327 has cylinder heads with threaded holes to allow the later accessories to attach to the motor. Most 327 motors are pre-1969 vintage and didn't have accessory holes in cylinder heads, but maybe someone swapped the heads out for you to a later style.
Your main concern will be if the 327 has cylinder heads with threaded holes to allow the later accessories to attach to the motor. Most 327 motors are pre-1969 vintage and didn't have accessory holes in cylinder heads, but maybe someone swapped the heads out for you to a later style.
"There's no substitute for cubic inches" is a true statement from a performance standpoint. Unless you have a free 327 in perfect running condition floating loose in the garage, spending the same dollars you will have in the 327 on the 350 should net greater gains in performance. May we ask why you are considering this swap?
You can twist a 327 pretty high which means that you could run silly gears without running out of motor. A friend back in the day did this with a Nova. He built a 302 and ran 5:13s...the car was snappy to say the least.
You can twist a 327 pretty high which means that you could run silly gears without running out of motor. A friend back in the day did this with a Nova. He built a 302 and ran 5:13s...the car was snappy to say the least.
That's the same thing Chevy did with the Z/28 in 1969. They put a 283 crank in a 327 and got a 302 for Trans Am racing.
The 350 based LT-1 replaced the 302 for Trans Am racing and it wound just as high but had more torque for twisting those rear gears.
This was a pretty interesting article in last months Super Chevy, I tend to agree but think the 302 had a little advantage with they way they built it. The saying in my old days as a street racer was ALWAYS race a 302 Z/28 from a standing start NEVER from a rolling start not even a 5MPH roll! Link to motor article: http://www.superchevy.com/technical/...ing/index.html
You're going the wrong way. Stroke the 350 block to 383 instead of destroking it. 327's were the shnizzle in their day, but you didn't see many of 'em made after the 350 came out. Reckon there's a reason???
You're going the wrong way. Stroke the 350 block to 383 instead of destroking it. 327's were the shnizzle in their day, but you didn't see many of 'em made after the 350 came out. Reckon there's a reason???
Right. All things being equal "there's no replacement for displacement"
I am not sure but I believe the older heads may not accommodate the newer exhaust manifolds. I seem to remember the bolt patterns changed in the mid 70's not to mention some stuff might be metric in the 81. Not sure though. That may have been the 305's or 307's.
This was a pretty interesting article in last months Super Chevy, I tend to agree but think the 302 had a little advantage with they way they built it. The saying in my old days as a street racer was ALWAYS race a 302 Z/28 from a standing start NEVER from a rolling start not even a 5MPH roll! Link to motor article: http://www.superchevy.com/technical/...ing/index.html
That is an interesting article, I'm sure most won't read it though because they don't want to believe it.
That is an interesting article, I'm sure most won't read it though because they don't want to believe it.
There really isn't that much difference in HP between the motors, although the LT1 has more than the others, which was to be expected, but all in all, pretty even.
DJ has NOTHING on me, I have owned over five 68/69 302 Z/28 Camaros and six 70/72 LT-1 Vettes. Presently I own 2 LT-1 Vettes (OK I guess one is claimed by my wife but, I'm the one maintaining it.) 302s are OK but when push comes to shove, I'll take a LT-1 anytime!
Nirvana might just be found in a full Nascar spec SB2 from Hendrick or Childress. Never saw a dyno chart on a 9600 RPM unrestricted Cup engine but hear the 700 HP figure regularly enough to at least think it might be so. They live long enough to make 3 or 4 seasons in many of our street cars... we tend to be a low per year mileage group. Both organisations sell "customer" engines... wonder what the buy in requirement is?
Does anyone know if I can replace the 350 in my 81 vette with a 327?
Thanks
Jeff
Depends.....Legally for smog inspection states then NO you can't because that engine was not offered in the model year vette and it is older. Now you could put in a new LS7.
But if you want to know will it just bolt in just like the other one size wise? Yes it will. Externally it is the same engine.....the heads may cause you issues as already stated so look for the accy holes.
I agree with the others though...No replacement for cubic displacement. There is a reason all racing organizations limit the CID of an engine for a class.
This was a pretty interesting article in last months Super Chevy, I tend to agree but think the 302 had a little advantage with they way they built it. The saying in my old days as a street racer was ALWAYS race a 302 Z/28 from a standing start NEVER from a rolling start not even a 5MPH roll! Link to motor article: http://www.superchevy.com/technical/...ing/index.html
i read that article before and it clearly shows the limitations of the 202 heads ....that's why the 302 has such respectable hp numbers with the shorter stroke and actually breathes better than the 327 or 350 with the same heads...they were great heads back in the day but if they tested with some after market brands you would see the larger displacement mills skewed to higher hp numbers, intrestingly enough are the torque numbers ...proving again and again there is no substitute for displacement on a normally asperated engine...good stuff, thanks for the link....