When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
You will lose some parts breaking toque but, the 427 will REV faster and I personally prefer a 427 to a 454 motor, so did several Chevy Corvette engineers. The Book Corvette Stingray by Tom Falconer has a chapter on the developemnt and cancellation of the LS-7 and the Chevy engine guy said the cylinder bore wear and cooling problems were some very difficult problems they were working on for the 70 model year LS-7 motor, he actually said the L-88 was a better motor.
I have had both, and loved the torque of the 454 better. The 454 and 427 have the same bore, just different stroke. They use the same block, different crank. 4" stroke on the 454 and 3.76" stroke on the 396 and 427. The 396 uses a smaller bore block.
I love 427's and have never been scared to jump on a 454 with one.....but if the crank is going to be changed it just makes sense to go the other way. More cubes, lighter pistons etc etc.
Why gain the weight of a BBC when all that you really have are the cubes of a big SBC?
The L88's might have made more HP/Cubic Inch, but I doubt that would've been the scenario if the 454's were internally balanced.
If I were you I'd do one 3 things, I'd build a 427/434(SBC), keep it a 454, or build a 496. IMHO a building a 427 BBC is not very smart unless NCRS is your thing.
I have had both, and loved the torque of the 454 better. The 454 and 427 have the same bore, just different stroke. They use the same block, different crank. 4" stroke on the 454 and 3.76" stroke on the 396 and 427. The 396 uses a smaller bore block.
I've had 2 real LS-6 Chevelles and the term "stump puller" is an understatement. The low end torque difference is very noticeable. I speak in comparison to the 427/435's (L-71's) I've had/have.
It all depends on what you are trying to accomplish with the engine rebuild. If you are not looking for big power and you do want better fuel ecomony [that's really an oxymoron with a BB], destroking it might make sense (assuming you have to replace the crank anyway).
Same engine, two different animals,,,if your going anywhere the crank would determine what essentials you could use..If its a hydraulic cam engine and you want to keep it that way just chrome it up and slam the hood....
I have changed last year a stock L36 427 for a mildly modded 489 - result = 50% more HP, 50% more torque, 25% more revs - its the better and more driveable way to go
Parts needed for 496 conversion: stroker crank, rods and pistons.
Oh yeah, can't forget the 427 badge for the fender.
NOBODY can tell how much engine you have under those valve covers.
"Build it as big and bad as you can or you'll get tired of getting your A$$ handed to you by those that do."
Old Fart Somewhere in My Past
From: I tend to be leery of any guy who doesn't own a chainsaw or a handgun.
Originally Posted by Dr.J's74
has anyone destroked a 454 to 427?
I did, and have no regrets. I bought a used 454 and a used 427 crank, and rebuilt the motor as a 30 over 427. (It's my expendable track motor, while the original engine sits safely in storage.) I already had the balanced flywheel and damper, and didn't feel like buying new ones.
I've got enough horsepower with the 427 to break stuff if I feel the need, and a 496 won't get around a corner any faster than a 427 will (these are sports cars, after all).
going from my 427 to the 533 feels as if I was driving a 220 horse 283...yep...big big difference...and my 427 was very very quick with solid roller and 10.5 cr...
From: All humans are vermin in the eyes of Guru VA
Cruise-In IV Veteran
Cruise-In V Veteran
It is my belief that for every bore diameter, there is a corresponding RPM range to go along with every available stroke. This being dictated by the biggest valve you can cram in the motor without shrouding. (according to some people, about 53% of bore diameter for intake valve diameter). So for a given bore and stroke, it is possible to determine the appropriate RPM band. Do I know the math no.
Whenever I get done with my 355 my next motor is going to be a Hyd Roller 632
Do you want low end torque, or do you want high rev's and horsepower? Is your engine gonna live at 5000 RPM or higher? do you want just cruising and passing power or low ET?
there is no replacement for displacement.. just get you the biggest displacement you can and cam/port/carb/gear it for the power band you want... there are trade offs on everything..
well ok so tell me what you guys think? 454 block line bored and set for bottom end splay bolt set. 496 scat rotating assembly w/flat pistons. I'm looking @ a set of AFR headsw/ a 500 solid roller cam set up. I'm wanting to be able to run pump gas and be streetable. Ive got a demon carb, and an edelbrock, so well see wich one it likes more.any thanks for the imput I was wonderng why i never seen a 454 to a 427 now i know