Best Fuel Injection System???
Gordon's comments are right on.
I opted for a torquey, responsive 383 with gearing that does not require more than 5500 RPM. With my enlarged runners and throttle body, I have no problem with airflow.
Is it Leo?
Gordon's comments are right on.
I opted for a torquey, responsive 383 with gearing that does not require more than 5500 RPM. With my enlarged runners and throttle body, I have no problem with airflow.
low cost used and it is true port injection, with numerous injector sizes avaiable.
the price is right! and it can be re-sold fast if for any reason u don't like it.
see my article http://community-2.webtv.net/MATTGRU/carb
see page 2 for carb info
.
But there is something wrong with your combo. Post details if u want help. There is nothing in your profile.
I read your article and dont understand most haha. I'm only 20 and dont know that much about carbs ... In English :-) ... what do i need to get 16+ mpg? 4165-6210 and what else? What intake do you recomend?
Thanks Will
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
see my new article on mpg secrets http://community-2.webtv.net/MATTGRU/EFIMPG
Where I live is E10, but if I go 30 miles up the road, it is straight 100% gas. Different jets needed to optimize power and mileage. Also, I can't use E85 if I want to.
There is a company that offers the components to convert a Gen I SBC to coil pack ignition controlled by a LS1 computer. You can go carbed or EFI. If you go EFI with this setup, it is a short jump to a DBW throttle body which means cruise is easy.
I am more interested in making a Flex Fuel SBC. Combine EFI with a GM fuel composition sensor, wideband O2 sensors and a computer programmed to compensate the AFR based on ethanol content (2003 trucks) and you have a SBC that can run on almost anything that you can fill up with (except diesel).
My car is a hobby and I consider this an interesting challenge.
There's a good article on Car Craft.
http://www.carcraft.com/techarticles...ion/index.html
This is there test set-up and dyno sheet.
I like how you think- we have a bunch of E85 hear and you can make great power on that stuff!!!
Any aftermarket for Flex Fuel yet?
Last edited by CorvetteDave01; Jan 17, 2010 at 03:45 PM.
There's a good article on Car Craft.
http://www.carcraft.com/techarticles...ion/index.html
This is there test set-up and dyno sheet.

Perhaps microsquirt + MSD 6A ?
Plus You're spreading some misconceptions about FI being something newer than a carb - You are dead wrong - they both the same age (remember hot bulb engine from XIX century?? two stroke heavy oil engine with fuel injection).
plus Your trying to upgrade to TPI- with all respect to TPI guys "mono" injection was abandoned two decades ago, If You want to upgrade to EFI You need to go to individual injection - YET STILL IT WILL NOT DOUBLE YOUR MPG!!
I think that if You decided for a 383 to be Your daily driver You need to deal with the MPG's :P if anything I would definitely look into Your transmission?? (please don't say You got a 400 in Your daily driver and want to double Your MPG's with EFI) also what’s the ratio in the pumpkin?? what size tires?? do You drive with T-tops off?? ...and remember, the biggest improvement in MPG's comes from driving style changes...
Hope I didn't offend anyone!
Last edited by PaPaPork; Jan 18, 2010 at 10:30 AM.
I used to have a Pontiac 455 in a '70 Lemans Convertible, thm400, 12 bolt 321 posi rear 15" tires it had the obvious Qj on it for some 3 years, it was my tow car, as well as schlep mobile for the little kids, long about '92 I had my second vette, a stone stock '87, and so it was maybe the 5th car with some sort of FI on it, over the years...I loved the operational characteristics of it,....a friend stored his '79, 455 Hurst Olds race car in my garage for a time, he had a TBI setup on it, I got the idea of putting FI on my Pontiac.....Junkyard run yielded a DPFI setup off a '79 Sedan DeVille 425, I cobbled it onto the Pontiac with help from a good TIG welder on the aluminum Edel dual plane mani.....running the stock Bendix computer/wiring from the Caddy...got me ~40% better fuel economy over the Qj, and it was not even closed loop operation, and driveability was MUCH IMPROVED, instant throttle response, dip toes into the pedal and that car instantly pulled like a Peterbuilt, the noise from 1000 cfm t-Body was loud enough and the dual exhaust ripped from idle to whatever....winter or summer....
so with that success, I turned to the boat, just a '85 20' Bayliner with a Volvo i/o and 2100 engine, had a single barrel solex on it...that thing would tow the kids around on the river for about 2-2.5 hours before running outta gas....so I found that huge improvement with FI on the Poncho, I got a Turbo Volvo DPFI intake setup from junkyard, along with a GM 2300 Grand Am computer, I was looking more for ease of operation/starting, as that Solex had no choke, making that boat a bear in cooler weather mornings....hated the POS....
I consulted with a USCG local DC area engineer, who was chief liaison working on FI with the BIA..boating ind. assn.....so fire/safety was an issue, especially with kids on board...after the project was finalized, the thing ran over 4 hours on the river, and picked up THREE prop sized, the torque on take off was nearly doubled, I went from a ~14" 3 bladed aluminum prop to a rehubbed Mercruiser cupped stainless 15" prop.....maybe should have stayed with 14", but the entire operational characteristics of the boat changed so drastically it was not funny, instead of hitting the throttle and engine winding up boat not going anywhere, don't forget I had a tow behind me too....I hit that throttle, they better have a GRIP now, that boat would jump so hard outta that water, I had to hold the helm...serious....
so, along about '95 or so, I grew weary of other issued with the '87 vette, sold it and bought my '72 vette, dead stock fresh L48 engine, Muncie 336 rear.....with the original QJ it got only 12-14 mpg and in winter only 10 around town...no fun....
so on went a TPI from Carlisle, and the mpg went to 24 on the highway cruising 80, doing some 4000 rpm, kinds tough on the engine, that was the configuration I drove from DC to Jax Florida, house/territory hunting looking to move from the land of ice and snow....
In a way I should have stayed with that setup...but NO, had to do a hotrod....so original L48 was removed/later sold, and in went a 355 roller engine, with overdrive automatic, which in '97 was the cheepest way to get overdrive into that vette....due to some ~120 hp increase, the car only gets a max of 22 mpg now...oh well....there have been many combos and heads, and inductions on there, all of them variations on the TPI, and several chip into the sock speed density GM 1227730 computer....
about 4 years ago I tried a Mega Squirt....but due to the Serial D connector and all the adapters needed, I could not find a functioning computer that would enable me to tune the thing, I gave up after two months battle, and went back to stock system...
I have had my issues with this '72 and the FI, but nothing inherent, just some water in gas, and injector sizing/types....the latest is a switch to a highly modded LT1 induction on the L98 setup....
IMO, after some 50 years of hotrodding, running anything from Holley to Carter WCFB, AFB, even 2 bbls carbs, seeing friends with Tri Power setups, even dual quads.....cross rams, Hemi's, old Pontiac 421, 389, 350 engines, and that 455 I modded above, the use of carbs is a thing of the past these daze....sorry, but I do have a slight advantage, in that being a olde tyme ET, I do have a goodly bit of test gear like my old Tektronics scope, DVM, audio oscillator, and Weller soldering station, which makes any silliness with wiring easy....I am however not much on programming computers...



so having said all that, the one thing I find missing from the above comments is that you can take the TPI stock manifold,and siamese the runners about 2.5" down the adjacent runs, and that allows a huge increase in rpm, while giving up very little in lo torque....SO I HAVE HEARD.....I never did it to my TPI's as I had a large runner system on there before going to the LT1 induction....
All the dyno and real world stuff I've studied have shown the two to be very nearly equal. Sunset Racecraft sold several race engines with EFI that made very similar power to carb'd engines, the problem was that nobody wanted to take the time to learn to program 'em, so the boss spent a lot of his time handling them. A well set-up carb will deliver the same performance as a well set-up EFI. Check out the guys racing LS engines - the ones making the most power are on a carb, a good EFI system for bigger cubes or higher RPM racing has proven to be elusive at this point. Keep in mind that some of the best computer tuners in the business have given it a shot and can't beat the carb. Granted, a lot of it has to do with the lack of a decent intake with good airflow, but it is what it is.
If you're frustrated with a carb, you'll ****** yourself bald trying to figure out EFI. If a system is very easy to program, you can bet it'll be down on performance.
One electrical problem or computer glitch can leave you stranded with no idea where to start looking for the problem. Can't say the same for a carb'd engine, at least for most of us. We may still be stranded, but at least we can check the basics without a laptop.
Besides, they just don't look as cool as a nice carb setting on top of a nice intake, all the wires and plastic junk make 'em look cheap, IMHO.




























