When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I haven't suggested that a PCV system limits power, simply that IMO it is an emissions device that is unnecessary and may have a small impact on performance.
I can understand many peoples attitude of 'I've got 400bhp, I wont miss 5bhp' but in my background of race cars and cars that maybe only make 120bhp, that 5bhp makes a difference.
I think maybe I forget that many Corvette owners are Sunday cruisers and as long as the thing lays rubber and runs smooth they don't care about eking out every last BHP.
This probably is the issue, No one is argueing that Lemans cars engineers are idiots for not running a PCV system. Thats a racing car where even a fraction of a percent of power might make the difference.
We on the other hand live in the real world where, even if we visit the drag strip or the road course on occasion a fraction of a HP is indetectable to us. None of this is to say that there arent some here on the boards who are interested in eeking out every last drop of power, this forum is nothing if not a broad group of people with differing goals.
In the case of the OP, I dont get the impression he's got a race car or that he's planning anytime soon to be in a position where 1-2 hp will make a difference, There are an awful lot of things racers do that we dont, and just because a thing is good for racers doesnt make a thing good for a street driven vehicle.
A far more challenging test for many of us may be to make as much power as is possible and remain emissions legal.
A couple of years ago, a guy on another forum, and I played around with using a FORD airpump, totally rerouted as to suck from the intake/pvc position, and actually put the crankcase under a vacuum of about 5-7 psi when idling/running down the road....the thing would suck some oil pretty bad, and so I needed a oil/air-fume separator can, and drain back into the oil pan/sump....I never went that far with it...too much PIA to drop the pan and mod the thing.....
at any rate, the trick was that running the sump at a actual vacuum using the belt driven pump was supposed to reduce crank drag and net up about another 5 hp or so....NO dyno runs by me on that claim, but maybe someone has done something there, do a search....
another thing that killed the idea for ME, was the problem with the fumes, they flat out stunk like cat's ***....lord love a DUCK they were BAD.....
Jeez,..how can something so simple (PCV System) be so misunderstood.
You absolutely need it (or another crankcase evac system) to remove the harmful blowby gases, which include unspent fuel and water vapor, that conspire to cause sludge and corrosion in the crankcase.
ALL engines have some blowby!
A pair of breathers won't cut it. You need flow through the crankcase, created by vacuum. Fresh air replaces the harmful blowby gases. This also provides a bit of vacuum in the crankcase which a good thing; helps prevent oil leaks and any racer knows, that vacuum in the crankcase is good for horsepower. Few (if any) serious engines run without vacuum pumps at the drags.
For the street, there's no reason not to run a PCV system, unless you don't understand it's functionality.
Personally I don't want to feed my engine oil vapours and exhaust gas but that's just me.
Whatever you like. It's YOUR engine.
1,000,000,000 cars have them with no great "ill" effect.
Race cars don't have them, but so what, they are torn down after every race.
Personally I don't want to feed my engine oil vapours and exhaust gas but that's just me.
If you're pulling enough "oil vapours and exhaust gas" through the PCV valve to effect your engine, then there's something very wrong with said engine.
If you're pulling enough "oil vapours and exhaust gas" through the PCV valve to effect your engine, then there's something very wrong with said engine.
If this is true, then why is it such a mad idea to vent it to atmosphere?
If this is true, then why is it such a mad idea to vent it to atmosphere?
Because you should fix the problem rather than covering it up. You would be losing more hp from excessive blowby than you would by recirculating the gasses.
Because you should fix the problem rather than covering it up. You would be losing more hp from excessive blowby than you would by recirculating the gasses.
Sorry I was a bit vague.
Some people have said that the reason why PCV is so important is because it's not good for the crankcase to have all those harmful gases going around inside the engine.
You've just said that on a good engine the amount of oil fumes and blow-by should be so small as to not effect performance.
I agree with you about the small amount, but then does it not also figure that you will not end up with an engine bay full of exhaust gas and oil if you have an open vent?
I agree with you about the small amount, but then does it not also figure that you will not end up with an engine bay full of exhaust gas and oil if you have an open vent?
Every engine has blow by, period. Even a small amount will contaminate the oil somewhat. Just venting the crankcase will not replace these gasses with fresh air. This is the purpose of a PCV valve.
Racing engines have the oil changed quite often, so this isn't a big deal.
BTW, I hear people all the time reffering to a PCV as a "pollution control valve". It's a "positive crankcase ventilation" valve.
Every engine has blow by, period. Even a small amount will contaminate the oil somewhat. Just venting the crankcase will not replace these gasses with fresh air. This is the purpose of a PCV valve.
I hate to agree then disagree but this simply isn't true of all engines.
Many European engines, designed way after the late 60's/early 70's don't use PCV, they just use closed crankcase ventilation.
In these systems the crankcase vent is fed to the air filter housing/air box but the crankcase has no fresh air intake at all. These engines have done 100's of 1000's of miles with no detrimental effects to lifespan or performance.
PCV is a piece of emissions equipment, designed to reduce smog in engines built and tuned in the late 60's.
Today with cleaner fuels, better engineering, better oils and better tuning it presents such a small amount of pollution it's really not that big a deal.
Although it may be small, having spent ages building and tuning an engine I want maximum available performance out of it. If that means not feeding a small amount of garbage back in to the intake then I'll do it.
Maybe this is where the confusion is. You're talking about european and racing engines while the rest of us are talking about 70's vintage, street driven chevrolet V8's.
Maybe this is where the confusion is. You're talking about european and racing engines while the rest of us are talking about 70's vintage, street driven chevrolet V8's.
I'd agree with you if it were 1969 but how many Corvette's still run the original engine, carb, oil and fuel from 1969.
Oil and fuel technology alone is light years from the 1960's. Combine that with improvements in replacement piston and ring design, engineering tolerances and manifold and carb design and even though the block may be from 1969, everything else isn't.