When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I had a '65 Corvette with an L79. These engines were designed with a blowby tube on the back of the intake manifold and a rubber hose than hung down the back of the engine.
Made quite a mess on the underside of the car and even dripped oil on the pavement.
As we all know, oil, especially used oil, is not good for the ground and lord knows we get enough of it everywhere anyway.
Golden, I have to tell you that maybe one little car or even a few race cars won't make any difference but billions of them blowing used oil all over the place will absolutely have an effect. And over time the effect is compounded.
Removing the PCV is not unlike what Bubba does with most things. If he doesn't understand it and he 'cain't figger it out' he disables it.
Geez, a little valve that ensures the crankcase has room for fresh air by removing the nasty stuff already in there...what's the big deal. It's not a conspiracy for crying out loud.
People always ripped the A.I.R. pumps off too thinking they robbed them of horse power. Yes, they are parasitic because of the belt but that's about it. They just pump fresh air into the exhaust manifolds. No power robbing there. It's all downstream of the combustion process.
I had a '65 Corvette with an L79.
Removing the PCV is not unlike what Bubba does with most things. If he doesn't understand it and he 'cain't figger it out' he disables it.
Are you suggesting I'm some kind of ignorant simpleton that doesn't understand what they're doing?
Originally Posted by CCrane72
Geez, a little valve that ensures the crankcase has room for fresh air by removing the nasty stuff already in there...what's the big deal. It's not a conspiracy for crying out loud.
You clearly either haven't read the thread or have no grasp what so ever of what PCV is and it's implications.
Originally Posted by CCrane72
People always ripped the A.I.R. pumps off too thinking they robbed them of horse power. Yes, they are parasitic because of the belt but that's about it. They just pump fresh air into the exhaust manifolds. No power robbing there. It's all downstream of the combustion process.
Good grief.
WHAT! air pumps rob power to run, cause turbulence in the headers, raises manifold temperature, compounding the turbulence, reducing cylinder scavenging, lowering cylinder VE.
Before you start posting pompous replies I suggest you know what you're talking about.
I probably have to put my hand up on the latter at times, if that's what you mean. You just seem to be trying pretty hard to prove something. Comes off as rude to me, that's all.
Are you suggesting I'm some kind of ignorant simpleton that doesn't understand what they're doing?
You clearly either haven't read the thread or have no grasp what so ever of what PCV is and it's implications.
WHAT! air pumps rob power to run, cause turbulence in the headers, raises manifold temperature, compounding the turbulence, reducing cylinder scavenging, lowering cylinder VE.
Before you start posting pompous replies I suggest you know what you're talking about.
Wow. Quite the arrogence from the land of SU carbs, Lucas electrical, and warm beer. How's that British space program going?
Golden, let me try this another way. I can't wait to read your response. Blowby is simply the transference of gases from the "right" side of the rings, to the "wrong" side of the rings. A PCV merely takes the gases from the "wrong" side of the rings, and places them back into the "right" side.
If the escaped gases originate in the "right" side in the first place, what "harm" will they do the second time thru?
The thing I have against using breathers in the valve covers is that it forces the crankcase to use the same pathway for pressure release that was designed as an oil return from the rockers so you already have oil in the path and the built up pressure pushes it back up toward the breather.
Not very efficient. The PCV valve uses one valve cover to vent pressure to the combustion chamber via the carburetor and the other to pull in fresh filtered air to replace it.
Given the above scenario you have increased the oil return capacity by up to 50% while providing a positive relief for internal pressure from the crankcase.
This also increases the life of the oil by removing the contaminants in blowby from the crankcase.
I have not seen a down side to the PCV system at all when used and maintained as designed.
If you are concerned about oil in the intake manifold, GM makes a product called Top Engine Cleaner you might consider using every so often. It was made specifically to clean out the intake.
If the escaped gases originate in the "right" side in the first place, what "harm" will they do the second time thru?
Increased carbon build up in the combustion chamber, disrupted airflow in the carburettor, increased intake charge temperatures, increased carb running temperature, reduced cylinder VE, reduced HP.
Originally Posted by 73, Dark Blue 454
To those that argue against the use of a PCV system, what's your suggested alternative? A pair of breathers?
A pair of open filtered breathers or one or two filtered catch tanks.
Originally Posted by CCrane72
The thing I have against using breathers in the valve covers is that it forces the crankcase to use the same pathway for pressure release that was designed as an oil return from the rockers so you already have oil in the path and the built up pressure pushes it back up toward the breather.
Not very efficient. The PCV valve uses one valve cover to vent pressure to the combustion chamber via the carburetor and the other to pull in fresh filtered air to replace it.
Given the above scenario you have increased the oil return capacity by up to 50% while providing a positive relief for internal pressure from the crankcase.
Even if you had an engine with such bad piston blow-by it could hardly run, it still wouldn't create enough pressure to stop oil flowing through relative large head and block castings.
Originally Posted by CCrane72
This also increases the life of the oil by removing the contaminants in blowby from the crankcase.
This may have been true in the 60's with basic mineral oil and no additives. Today's oils will easily tolerate even excessive blow-by.
Also let me remind you again that many more modern engines do not have PCV just a closed breather system. If oil and crankcase contamination was such an issue don't you think all manufacturers would use PCV?