When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I searched the forum for info on DOT 5.1 vs. DOT 4 and found the latest thread to be from 2008.
Can ya'll offer recent input on this for my 69 streetrod with regular brakes?
I see DOT 5.1 advantage to not eat paint. Disadvantage to be that it enables water to 'pool'... ?? Is it expensive - if not just change yearly... which we should do anyway.
As for DOT 4 - its great - but eats paint... I know - what am I doing rubbing it on my paint,..... don't ask - it's Murphy's Law.
I see DOT 5 has been around for like 10 years..... where have I been - oh yeah - raising kids.
I have been using DOT5 in my 68 and 70 Corvettes for 22-23 years. The 68 has manual brakes and the 70 power brakes. I switched because I did not want to change out the DOT3/DOT4 fluid, which is hydroscopic, absorbs water.
If you research brakes fluids you will find that there is a difference between DOT 5 and DOT 5.1. DOT 5.1 will mix with DOT 4 as they have the same base, but DOT 5 will not as it is silicone based.
Yeah - I am aware of those basic differences... I am not interested in 5.0 at all. Its either DOT4 or 5.1. But the advantage of not damaging paint is attractive to me. I will investigate the costs now.
Now I have new calipers, lines, etc and Master Cylinder.... But if the master Cylinder has remnants of what DOT3/4 in it from its manufacture test, do I worry about that?
Another item of importance is whether the 5.1 (since it does not absorb water) will allow pudldling of water and is that even an issue if you replace it every 12 months?
Yeah - I am aware of those basic differences... I am not interested in 5.0 at all. Its either DOT4 or 5.1. But the advantage of not damaging paint is attractive to me. I will investigate the costs now.
Now I have new calipers, lines, etc and Master Cylinder.... But if the master Cylinder has remnants of what DOT3/4 in it from its manufacture test, do I worry about that?
A quick flush with Denatured Alcohol will take care of that.
Another item of importance is whether the 5.1 (since it does not absorb water) will allow pudldling of water and is that even an issue if you replace it every 12 months?
It appears the cost of 5.1 is about $9-$13 per Qt. Although I cannot find it locally… yet….
Is there a brand that is better? Is the 5.1 colored as well or is that for 5.0 only?
Also regarding flushing – I say I have all new parts, but technically, my valves/block fittings are old and have not been flushed – so do I still have to worry about flushing those even though they have been ‘dry’ for 7 years? Is the proper way to flush a system to assemble completely and add denatured alcohol and bleed out???? Then disassembly, bench bleed and …. Or?????
Gee - of course - I realized this before lunch and wanted to post that - but appreciate you clarifying that. That takes away a large hesitation I had with going with 5.1.
It seems there is no reason not to go with 5.1
I will get a few temp ratings and get back just fyi
Hi KB,
I found the fact that the 5 or 5.1 doesn't affect paint to be a bigger plus than I thought it would be when I had a problem sealing 2 of the connections. I would have had a lot more work to do if I had a paint problem too. I think it's worth what ever effort it takes to use 5 or 5.1.
Regards,
Alan
I'll be ready very soon to fill a currently dry system comprised of almost all new pieces. I checked my local NAPA auto parts store and they sell their branded version in the popular DOT ratings, including DOT 5.
They sell in qty's of 12oz, 32oz and 1 gal. (over $100 US for the gallon. Ouch.) As previously stated, I like the idea of it being silicone-based and promoted not to destroy paint. That sounds plenty good for my street application.
I left my disc-based AIM (Thanks for great info, Willcox!) loaded in one of the DVD trays on my home machine so do not have the capacity's chart here at the job site.
What is the total quantity required to fill a dry system on our C3's? I have all new lines, distr blocks, and calipers (VB&P) and a rebuilt MC. I'd want a little extra for bleeding too.
Thanks and a tip o'the hat in advance to whomever may provide the number.
I must love punishment as I "like" working on brakes. I have performed several brake overhauls on my Vette, other vettes and my "normal" daily drivers.
I generally like to use ATE "SUPER BLUE .. you can find it on Motive web site. However I also just use any good DOT 4 that is availible often. This is because when I first bought the vette it had DOT 5 ... I worked and attempted to bleed the brakes to little avail. I ended up doing the switch back to DOT 4 and never looked back! For me I will never have DOT 5 in another car, the performance is not as good anthe headache not worth it.
Although I finally found it at O'Reilley's (it was a Wagner FC 3300100). BUT I found that 5.1 indeed still eats paint. I confirmed this verbally with StopTech.com's tech dept. That was the deciding factor for me - so DOT 4 it is.... Happy that I did my research - happy with DOT4 and that conversion to Power Brakes is now almost complete.
StopTech.com also has an article I need to read on rotor warping (the myths)....but that's another story - check it out.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.