Pilot bushing clearance spec?
Advanced search was not able to help me so here my question:
What is the typical/recommended clearance of the pressed in pilot bushing to the transmission input shaft?
Background: I installed a new bronze bushing which is supposed to accept the shaft of a Keisler T45 RS tranny. But for some reason the inner diameter of the bushing (pressed in) is 0,001'' smaller than the outer diameter of the shaft...
so I need to rework the bushing a little and for this I am looking for my new target diameter... Thanks
Carsten
My research in the internet brought up a range of required bushing to input shaft clearances between 0,001 to 0,008''... shall I go for the golden middle?
Any input appreciated!
Carsten
I've seen cranks pulled out of automatic trans cars with the crank hole majorly screwed up.
The bushing OD of the old muncie bushing and the new T45 bushing differs only by 0,001'' (so they are almost the same). The ID of course is different.
I measured the T45 bushing ID at 0.667'' whereas the inputshaft OD has 0.668''.
Ideally you want no lateral movement. This is very hard to get because the bearing should be greased and the grease has some thickness which needs to be included in the calculation. Grease normally works best between .001" and .004" depending on weight and type...synthetics can work better with less. So, at minimum the bearing should be .002" larger than the shaft...at least that's where I'd start. And, I wouldn't go any more than .008"
Last edited by Rockn-Roll; Jul 6, 2010 at 12:12 PM.





For holes or bores I use a dial bore gauge and then measure the result of the bore gauge with a 1/10,000" mic. I am not trying to do anything here but help you. I would not use a 1/1000" mic on an engine, you will not get accurate results. As for measuring the inside bore if you are using the calipers for that and that mic for the measuring the shaft you margin of error is probably greater than 1 thou to begin with so you really don't have any accurate measurements there. I use a small bore gauge to measure holes / bores too small for my dial bore gauge.
Again please don't get me wrong I am just trying to relate my experience (I worked in a machine shop after high school ) and how to get accurate an correct measurements so you have a basis for fixing a problem. These measurements can stack up to ( additive ) and by the time you have made 3 or 4 measurements you could be way off line
The first thing you should do is talk to Keisler. These newer transmissions have much tighter tolerances on input and output shaft meaning you can't wiggle them around like a munce or T10

Keisler should have sent you a bearing with kit or recommended one anyway and you must use the bearing the recommend. For my TKO it was a roller bearing and my friend who owns a machine shop didn't want to put that into a $1000 crank but I insisted, never had a problem with it or the one in my previous 406ci.
Bottom line is contact Keisler and talk to them but you have to use the bearing they want you to use. And always check to see how it fits the input shaft before you put it in the crank
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
I have my bushing machined to where it should be and everything is fine.
Thanks for alle the comments!

Carsten
Just a suggestion for anyone else out there just obtaining a new Trans... check the pilot before installing it in the crank...





I am once again swearing off roller pilot bearings after seeing how bad mine looks after only 5,000 miles of service, nothing but, plain bushings for the rest of my life in old C3 Vettes. Yes, I did indicate in the bellhousing to within 0.002" TIR before installation and made sure the crank bore and bearing OD had a 0.001" interferance fit on installation.
Here is a link to the Autogear site: http://autogear.net/whatsnew.php











