When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I have a 427ci BBC with a deadline of 5500 rpm´s. Now I figured out, that my intake mainfold (Edelbrock Torker II), is desiged for high rpm´s. So I´m considering to swap my intake mainfold to a Edelbrock Performer.
Does it make sense to do this? Will I get any gain of torque or horse power?
Advices would be appreciated.
Basically what will happen with a dual plane intake like the Performer is you'll have a change in the rpm ranges where power and torque are produced. You'll notice better torque in the low to mid rpm band where the single plane Torker makes horsepower and torque in the higher rpm ranges.
Which is best for you depends on how you drive the car. The Performer will give better idle and take off for street driving. If you spend a lot of time at high rpm's, stick with the Torker.
There will be some different of horsepower and torque production, but not that much...it's mostly shifted to different rpm bands.
Basically what will happen with a dual plane intake like the Performer is you'll have a change in the rpm ranges where power and torque are produced. You'll notice better torque in the low to mid rpm band where the single plane Torker makes horsepower and torque in the higher rpm ranges.
Which is best for you depends on how you drive the car. The Performer will give better idle and take off for street driving. If you spend a lot of time at high rpm's, stick with the Torker.
There will be some different of horsepower and torque production, but not that much...it's mostly shifted to different rpm bands.
I have used both inlets - started with stock low rider on L36 427 that struggled to get to 5000 rpm. Next on same engine was 750 DP on Torker 2 much the same (struggled to get to 5000 rpm) and despite supposedly being a high rpm part it did improve mid-range performance between 2500 and 3500 rpm - and fitted under stock BB hood. New 489 is using a RPM Air Gap - on this engine it works superb with a usable power band between 1200 and 6000 plus rpm, but all components like heads, cam inlet etc are optimised to work together - DOES NOT fit under stock L36 hood (nor L88 for that matter)
From: Graceland in a Not Correctly Restored Stingray
Günther, if you're limiting RPM to only 5500 and not spending much time there I'd go for the Performer, which is designed for idle-5500 performance.
As for gaining more torque or horsepower, I basically agree with Roughrider's post, as you can't have one without the other. In this case, it's more a matter of where the torque and power are made. That said, while a single plane might ultimately produce more power on top end with the right combo, IMCO at 5500 RPM you're just not getting nearly far enough into its designed operating range to really benefit.
FWIW, there are guys here with Air-Gaps and even Holley Strip Dominators under L88 hoods w/CAI. Going with the latter myself, but then my redline/limiter is going to be 7200.
From what I understand, we BBC folks need more help at the upper RPMs instead of the lower end because we already produce enough torque down low. I don't spend much time above 4-5K so a non-Torker manifold might be more useful, but then there's the hood fitment.
I don't know of any intakes other than the Torker or the stock manifold that'll fit under the stock BB hood. I'm surprised to hear folks have issues with some manifolds fitting under an L88 hood also.
Last edited by shrekviper; Aug 26, 2010 at 06:30 PM.
If you are willing to run an L88 hood, the BB Edle RPM air gap is THE BEST all around intake for BBs that are 6500 rpms and less. Pick up power everywhere with one...even on stock engines. It will support 650+hp untouched/out of the box. I know of a few that made almost 700hp with Ported/worked RPM air gap.
If you are staying stock BB hood, I am not sure even the regular Performer will fit. It is actually pretty tall, where as the TII is flat as a pancake. Both manifolds suck. I would think with some porting/plenum work, the TII could be made to work "ok" for a mild motor. Not a lot of options for a stock BB hood.
Have you considered the GM Performance Parts intake (I'm using PN 12363420)? Remember, the intake should match up with the cam that you've got too. This thing will fit under an L88 hood (depending on the carb and air cleaner of course) and pulls from 1500 - 6500 according to GM.
Have you considered the GM Performance Parts intake (I'm using PN 12363420)? Remember, the intake should match up with the cam that you've got too. This thing will fit under an L88 hood (depending on the carb and air cleaner of course) and pulls from 1500 - 6500 according to GM.
There are a lot of people (myself included) that refuse to give up the BB hood. Ill sacrifice a little performance to keep it. It already barks the tires coming out of passing gear at 100 mph. I dont think the LS6 intake on my 454HO is losing too much.
There are a lot of people (myself included) that refuse to give up the BB hood. Ill sacrifice a little performance to keep it. It already barks the tires coming out of passing gear at 100 mph. I dont think the LS6 intake on my 454HO is losing too much.
I don't blame you for not wanting to give up your hood, I didn't mean to imply anyone should. I was simply pointing out that this is a good performing intake that fits under the L88 hood.
From: Graceland in a Not Correctly Restored Stingray
Sorry, forgot about your hood when recommending the Performer. So, IIRC the LS6 aluminum dual plane is about it. FWIW, it can be matched to oval ports with a little effort and some proper epoxy, where applicable. Or, you could always cough up the bucks and go with 3x2's.
I have a Holley Street Dominator with a Q jet that is fixing to get installed under my stock hood. I have a few drop down bases and air cleaner combos to help this along.
I have wondered about an Inglese set up with DCOE side drafts grafted onto an Offenhauser low profile dual quad intake. That should be possible. Also the Inglese XFI system looks pretty low; but expensive!!
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.