When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I have been informed by the owner of a 70 vette that it is quite common in 1970 for cars NOT to have this information stamped on the blocks. It does have VxxxxCTH stamped in the pad, a 350hp car. The four numbers relate to the build date.
I have never heard of this. Does anyone know if this is remotely true ?
I have been informed by the owner of a 70 vette that it is quite common in 1970 for cars NOT to have this information stamped on the blocks. It does have VxxxxCTH stamped in the pad, a 350hp car. The four numbers relate to the build date.
I have never heard of this. Does anyone know if this is remotely true ?
If I remember correctly, there was a very short period where the VIN was stamped down near the oil pan rail instead. Not sure if this was in the '70 M/Y or not.
If I remember correctly, there was a very short period where the VIN was stamped down near the oil pan rail instead. Not sure if this was in the '70 M/Y or not.
I think I've seen the number being shown as stamped near the oil filter in my AIM. Never seen an example of this. I'd imagine the NCRS judging manual would note this if it's legit.
"In the first three to five days of 1970 production an alternate location was used for the serial number derivative. Look for this number above the oil filter, on the side of the case, just in front of the bell housing..."
...I have been informed by the owner of a 70 vette that it is quite common in 1970 for cars NOT to have this information stamped on the blocks...
He is mistaken. All C3s have a VIN derivitve stamped on the block pad. There are two exceptions: extremely early 70s had the VIN derivitive stamped near the oil filter.
The second exception occurs when a clear stamp cannot be made on the pad, even after trying it a couple of times and grinding out the misstamped derivitives. In that instance, the alternate location near the oil filter was used for the stamp locatin.
Both of these are rare. "Common" is the stamp on the pad.
I'm wondering whether your 70 owner is covering for a replacement engine.
He is mistaken. All C3s have a VIN derivitve stamped on the block pad. There are two exceptions: extremely early 70s had the VIN derivitive stamped near the oil filter.
The second exception occurs when a clear stamp cannot be made on the pad, even after trying it a couple of times and grinding out the misstamped derivitives. In that instance, the alternate location near the oil filter was used for the stamp locatin.
Both of these are rare. "Common" is the stamp on the pad.
I'm wondering whether your 70 owner is covering for a replacement engine.
It would seem illogical to have the build code but not the VIN derivative on the stamp pad. Decking the block would remove both. Why restamp just the build code? Could be a rather rare copy with the VIN derivative near the oil filter?
...Could be a rather rare copy with the VIN derivative near the oil filter?...
Could be an extremely early 70, but the original post was questioning whether it was common for 70s not to have a VIN derivitive on the pad. It is not common.
I didn't know there was a specified 'alternate location' for the block stamp...but it makes sense to have one. Surely, there were more than a few cars that failed testing due to engine problems when they completed final assembly. If some required a new replacement engine, the pad was clear to apply the proper numbers. But, you still had the engine that was removed and I'm sure GM didn't just scrap them; they were probably reworked back to good condition and had the existing pad numbers ground off. It would make sense that the 'new' restamp (when installed into another assembly line car) might be put near the oil filter instead of on the manually reground pad.