When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
You may improve the "manners" of the engine by removing, inspecting, cleaning and reinstalling the EGR valve....but no improvement (performance) by eliminating it.
Thanks guys. If I replaced the current hardware with an edelbrock performer rpm intake and a Holley carb that didn't have egr would that cause any problems with the rest of the motor? do replacement parts need to be egr equipped?
EGR valves do nothing but hurt performance and are designed solely for emissions reasons. The concept that a EGR valve will not hurt the performance characteristics of an engine is false. It will introduce superheated dirty air into the intake charge causing elevated combustion chamber temperature, detonation, higher coolant temperature, poor driveability characteristics, and will decrease the available power of the engine under most operating conditions. There is a reason that performance engine builders do not include an EGR valve under most circumstances if they do not have to. They can also decrease fuel economy! Leave it off if you can.
EGR valves are a performance disaster. I naively thought I could build a performance motor with the EGR valve in place. You can't. I tried for about five years before I finally gave up. I could't control the detonation. I finally pulled the whole system off and the engine immediately ran better. Unfortunately the attempt took out my bearings and I ended up rebuilding the motor a couple of years later. Learn from my mistake!
It will introduce superheated dirty air into the intake charge causing elevated combustion chamber temperature, detonation, higher coolant temperature, poor driveability characteristics, and will decrease the available power of the engine under most operating conditions.
Originally Posted by drwet
I could't control the detonation.
The EGR system does not raise combustion temperatures. It actually lowers them.
The whole purpose of the EGR system was to reduce the formation of nitrogen oxides.
It did this by lowering the combustion temperatures below the temp where they are formed.
When operating correctly the EGR reduces an engines tendency to ping at part throttle.
At full throttle, of course it affects nothing because it isn't active then.
Someone explain how introducing superheated previously partially burned hot exhaust gases in place of pure fresh cool intake charge reduces intake temperature? Why do EGR valves have a tendency to increase detonation if the valve cools the intake charge?
I would not run an EGR valve under any circumstances unless you have to-just my preference. You can choose what you want to do.
The EGR system does not raise combustion temperatures. It actually lowers them.
The whole purpose of the EGR system was to reduce the formation of nitrogen oxides.
It did this by lowering the combustion temperatures below the temp where they are formed.
When operating correctly the EGR reduces an engines tendency to ping at part throttle.
At full throttle, of course it affects nothing because it isn't active then.
That may be the theory, but in practice it just doesn't work. They plug up, they stick open. I am pretty good with engines, but in five years I could not get it to run right. One afternoon spend removing all that crap and the engine ran like it was supposed to. Unfortuneately it cost me an engine rebuild. Nowadays with computer controls they can make an EGR system work, but the systems they put on our cars in the seventies didn't.
As for how much power you can expect, that depends on how the engine was built. On a stock engine, you won't see a lot of performance improvement. There are too many other problems with these engines stock. Remember in the seventies the engineers were scrambling to reduce emissions because of government regulation. They were throwing systems on there to get the cars into showrooms that just didn't work. Compression was too low and carburetors were too lean. EGR valves were just part of that package. If you want your engine to run correctly, you need to fix all that stuff.
chicken lickin said that henny penny said that the sky is going to fall! i can imagine where this stuff comes from. like the pinheads who say a 160 degree thermostat will burn up my computer controlled engine, well it didn't on my mark 220k and going my 250 econoline 380k my 88 trans- am 320k .people are "educated" way beyond thiere intelligence
Someone explain how introducing superheated previously partially burned hot exhaust gases in place of pure fresh cool intake charge reduces intake temperature?
Explain how adding something that doesn't burn to the air/fuel will make the combustion hotter?
A couple of good quotes from the document-
Pg 1- The EGR reduces NOx production by recirculating small amounts of exhaust gases into the intake manifold where it mixes with the incoming air/fuel charge. By diluting the air/fuel mixtures under these conditions, peak combustion temperatures and pressures are reduced, resulting in an overall reduction of NOx output.
Pg 2- If too little EGR flows, the engine may knock and will not meet strict emissions standards.
I use to see this stuff on a pretty regular basis back in the 80s. An EGR valve would get plugged from carbon and the car would start pinging under light to moderate throttle. You could clear the EGR passages and stop the pinging.