When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Adjusting the points gap can be read with a Dwell meter. This would be (68-74) distributor. Not many folks have a dwell meter anymore. I have one from 20 years ago. As I recall, 28-30 is the dwell for GM V8's
I don't think HEI distributors have any need for dwell.
Adjusting the points gap can be read with a Dwell meter. This would be (68-74) distributor. Not many folks have a dwell meter anymore. I have one from 20 years ago. As I recall, 28-30 is the dwell for GM V8's
I don't think HEI distributors have any need for dwell.
I probably didn't answer your question
Unfortunately you didn't. I do have the equipment for my 1974. The suggested dwell is 29-31.
Last summer I had a complete failure of a points distributor. I had a re-built spare and to keep the car going I bench set the points at 0.017". I thought that would be good enough and indeed the car ran fairly well. Foolishly I did not set the timing. The idle was a little rough but I had no real problems.
This week I checked the dwell and it was 26. I checked the timing and it was 2*BTDC. Ouch!! I re-set the dwell at 30 and the timing at 10*BTDC static and things are much better. So it would seem 4*dwell = 8*timing or two for one.
I do have a Sears dial-back light but I did not have time to get fancy. I will drive tomorrow and see how things go and if need be go further on Monday.
I have a Breakerless SE unit, bought in a moment of high-tech weakness, but I do not trust those things.
Paul- I believe the answer is two as the crank turns twice the speed of the distributor.
Thanks Mike. I am embarrassed by my own laziness in not doing things right! I have all the Lars' papers etc. but sometimes round-to-its are round-to-its. Heck, only 125 miles this year.
But here's a treat for you. That hose is what is left of the end of my inlet 3/8" rubber hose on my fuel pump (strangely a fuel smell in my garage!!). Done. That donut gasket is what was left of the driver's side of my exhaust manifold/pipe. Done. So step-by-step. Old cars are fun at times....
Since dwell refers to how long the points remain closed, increasing the dwell causes the points to close a bit sooner and open a bit later as the rubbing block of the points rides over the cam.
Further, since the spark occurs when the points open, two degrees of dwell increase results in a spark one degree later at the distributor; but one degree at the distributor is two degrees at the crank.
Therefore, if the distributor is not re-adjusted, for each degree of dwell increase, the spark is retarded by one degree at the crank.
Last edited by larrywalk; Jun 26, 2011 at 11:54 AM.
first, you do not want dwell to be the basis of your timing, your dwell should be set at 30 degrees, that allows the correct saturation of your coil for it to fire correctly and for your condensor ( capacitor ) to recover, and to not burn your points. you adjust timing thru the position of the distributor.
for each degree of dwell change you are changing the closing of the points 1/2 a degree and changing the re-opening of the points by 1/2 a degree, for a total of 1 degree of change. so for each 1/2 degree of distributor rotation that you cause the opening of the point to occur, then you are changing your timing 1 degree since crankshaft rotation is twice distributor rotation.
so the answer is 1 to 1..
people think that changing dwell is 1 to 2, but you are actually changing both the opening and closing points by 1/2 the change for a total of the entire change.
it is confusing, so set your dwell at 30 and set your timing at the distributor.
Changing the dwell affects timing (as you've seen), but changing the timing doesn't affect dwell. Therefore, to time a car well you need to set the dwell first, then set the timing.
I've never really thought of the relationship of dwell angle changes to timing (a change of dwell of x degrees = Y degrees of timing change). I suppose they are related as some above have noted. But I don't know if that's all that useful. You wouldn't really want to adjust timing by changing dwell anyway would you?
it is confusing, so set your dwell at 30 and set your timing at the distributor.
I re-did both yesterday after initially finding the dwell at 26 and the timing at 2*BTDC. Dwell is now at 30 and timing at 10*BTDC. I got out for two hours this morning and this is an entirely new car! Startup, choke, idle in P and D, all perfect. Acceleration without hesitation. The car humms! Lesson? Round-to-its are meant to gotten around to.
for each degree of dwell change you are changing the closing of the points 1/2 a degree and changing the re-opening of the points by 1/2 a degree, for a total of 1 degree of change. so for each 1/2 degree of distributor rotation that you cause the opening of the point to occur, then you are changing your timing 1 degree since crankshaft rotation is twice distributor rotation.
so the answer is 1 to 1..
I think you sort of disagreed with yourself part way through your answer.
A dwell meter measures the number of degrees the points are closed, and represents the degrees of distributor shaft rotatation. IOW, 30 degrees of dwell = 30 degrees of distributor shaft rotation.
30 degrees of distributor rotation = 60 degrees of crankshaft rotation.
Timing is measured at the crankshaft, dwell is measured at the distributor
I think you sort of disagreed with yourself part way through your answer.
A dwell meter measures the number of degrees the points are closed, and represents the degrees of distributor shaft rotatation. IOW, 30 degrees of dwell = 30 degrees of distributor shaft rotation.
30 degrees of distributor rotation = 60 degrees of crankshaft rotation.
Timing is measured at the crankshaft, dwell is measured at the distributor
So being 4* off on the dwell was 8* off at timing? That jives with what I saw.
So being 4* off on the dwell was 8* off at timing? That jives with what I saw.
I may only have a tenuous grasp of the dwell concept, but I think that the condition of the contacts and perhaps other parts of the ignition circuit could also affect your dwell reading (though that may be a very tiny effect).
I remember reading a good article once on points, condensers, and coils and how they work together to generate a spark. It involved primary windings, and secondary windings, and fields collapsing and generating sparks...it was interesting, but I'd have to read it many times to really get it. Anyway, my point is that dwell may not be as simple as the degrees that the points are closed...though that's the easiest way to think about it. I think there may be other factors as well. So while 1 degree of dwell change may result in 2 degrees of timing change in your car, that may not be the same for someone else. But it's probably pretty close.
I may only have a tenuous grasp of the dwell concept, but I think that the condition of the contacts and perhaps other parts of the ignition circuit could also affect your dwell reading (though that may be a very tiny effect).
I remember reading a good article once on points, condensers, and coils and how they work together to generate a spark. It involved primary windings, and secondary windings, and fields collapsing and generating sparks...it was interesting, but I'd have to read it many times to really get it. Anyway, my point is that dwell may not be as simple as the degrees that the points are closed...though that's the easiest way to think about it. I think there may be other factors as well. So while 1 degree of dwell change may result in 2 degrees of timing change in your car, that may not be the same for someone else. But it's probably pretty close.
I really do thank you for your contribution. Putting the physics aside the basic lesson is to keep your car tuned. I neglected mine from sheer laziness. I won't again.
From: I tend to be leery of any guy who doesn't own a chainsaw or a handgun.
Originally Posted by jshepard77
I may only have a tenuous grasp of the dwell concept, but I think that the condition of the contacts and perhaps other parts of the ignition circuit could also affect your dwell reading (though that may be a very tiny effect).
I remember reading a good article once on points, condensers, and coils and how they work together to generate a spark. It involved primary windings, and secondary windings, and fields collapsing and generating sparks...it was interesting, but I'd have to read it many times to really get it. Anyway, my point is that dwell may not be as simple as the degrees that the points are closed...No, by definition dwell is how many distributor degrees that the coil is charging, and in the case of a points distributor it is the distributor angle that the points are closed though that's the easiest way to think about it. I think there may be other factors as well. So while 1 degree of dwell change may result in 2 degrees of timing change in your car, that may not be the same for someone else. But it's probably pretty close.
No. Crank degrees are always twice distributor degrees. If you delay the points opening one distributor degree (by increasing your dwell angle) your plug will fire two crank degrees later.
From: I tend to be leery of any guy who doesn't own a chainsaw or a handgun.
Originally Posted by paul 74
Points deteriorate and give warning. Electronic modules just...stop.
Actually, that's not correct. Electronic ignition systems have a variety of failure mechanisms. Some stop cold, as you stated, but others will just degrade in performance.
Actually, that's not correct. Electronic ignition systems have a variety of failure mechanisms. Some stop cold, as you stated, but others will just degrade in performance.
With my former 1979 that I drove for many years I experienced two HEI module failures from heat saturation. They were installed correctly with di-electric grease on the heat sink distributor base but nevertheless those now primitive micro-chips were flaky. You are correct in that they degraded, albeit suddenly, but maintained enough integrity to allow me to limp home in each instance about 30 miles.
But when a Pertronix goes, it goes.
If I seem like a Luddite here is a distributor in my basement professionally rebuilt from shims to shaft and more with a Breakerless SE unit (Lectric Limited). I may try it but not with a lot of confidence.
From: I tend to be leery of any guy who doesn't own a chainsaw or a handgun.
Originally Posted by paul 74
With my former 1979 that I drove for many years I experienced two HEI module failures from heat saturation. They were installed correctly with di-electric grease on the heat sink distributor base but nevertheless those now primitive micro-chips were flaky. You are correct in that they degraded, albeit suddenly, but maintained enough integrity to allow me to limp home in each instance about 30 miles.
But when a Pertronix goes, it goes.
If I seem like a Luddite here is a distributor in my basement professionally rebuilt from shims to shaft and more with a Breakerless SE unit (Lectric Limited). I may try it but not with a lot of confidence.
(thumbnail)
................
Might just be semantics, but I have to ask. Did you put heat-sink compound or dielectric grease on the heatsink? One conducts heat and one insulates.
With my former 1979 that I drove for many years I experienced two HEI module failures from heat saturation. They were installed correctly with di-electric grease on the heat sink distributor base but nevertheless those now primitive micro-chips were flaky. You are correct in that they degraded, albeit suddenly, but maintained enough integrity to allow me to limp home in each instance about 30 miles.
But when a Pertronix goes, it goes.
If I seem like a Luddite here is a distributor in my basement professionally rebuilt from shims to shaft and more with a Breakerless SE unit (Lectric Limited). I may try it but not with a lot of confidence.
Chips and systems made inhouse by GM also sent the Apollo missions to the moon and back. GM was chosen for their reliabilty.
Ford was responsible for most of the Apollo console equipment on the ground.
I would never have suspected they designed and made their own stuff.
They perhaps could have competed with Intel.