When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Cleaning the motor yesterday, I notice that the intake gasket is missing in the front. So, I'm pulling it to repair and thought I'd change the intake to a Edelbrock Performer 2101. Does it make any difference if I use the EGR or Non-EGR Intake? I don't have to worry about emissions testing?
Cleaning the motor yesterday, I notice that the intake gasket is missing in the front. So, I'm pulling it to repair and thought I'd change the intake to a Edelbrock Performer 2101. Does it make any difference if I use the EGR or Non-EGR Intake? I don't have to worry about emissions testing?
Get a non EGR model if you have no emissions requirement. It stands for exhaust gas recirculation(or reburn). And my opinion is that the motor will be more efficient without reburning carboned up exhaust gases..and look better..JM2C
It's been well documented with research here multiple times- EGR valves have NO effect on performance.
Thank goodness the so called documented efforts on this forum are so infallable. But the fugly EGR valve that sits atop a motor does nothing but allow crap into the engine, thats what it is made to do. I wouldn't dare to say performance suffers by having one on, but efficiency does not always equal performance, plus they look way better without one. Again my opinion.
Thank goodness the so called documented efforts on this forum are so infallable. But the fugly EGR valve that sits atop a motor does nothing but allow crap into the engine, thats what it is made to do. I wouldn't dare to say performance suffers by having one on, but efficiency does not always equal performance, plus they look way better without one. Again my opinion.
The last time I was in a conversation on the forum and the word documented came up, the documentation was so and so said this or read that but there was NO REAL Documentation!
Let's try some common sense on this one! If the choice is to allow unburned, superheated hot gases back into the combustion chamber diluting clean fresh air for combustion at high vacuum or not having any of these events occurring in your engine, which one would you choose if you are looking for the highest combustion efficiency, lowest risk of detonation, the better running engine? Hint: it would NOT be running an EGR valve-they serve one purpose only-reduce emissions! Like everything else in life, there is NO free ride-reduce emissions at the tradeoff of what?
Last edited by jb78L-82; Jul 24, 2011 at 10:50 AM.
EGR valve is closed under any low vacuum situation- ie no effect on performance.
This is the key point - EGR is only functional at low and low-mid throttle as the valve is opened by manifold vacuum. Mid to high throttle = low manifold vacuum = EGR valve closed = no EGR action = no power loss.
So...honestly...it doesn't take a lot of "documentation" to figure this one out
Now...at low and low-mid throttle, certainly you end up with a more dilute charge and some small impact on power output. But if you're looking for power output, you're not spending much time at low and low-mid throttle, are you?
Correct! I edited my mistake above and yes the impact is miminal at mid to high vacuum but the question remains for the best running engine, power aside, which one would you rather have, running an EGR valve-diluting incoming air mixture with superheated polluted air or not? Unless you need the EGR valve for emissions inspection, I would and do NOT have it. My stock L-82 ran like crap (rough idle), ran VERY hot, and detonated at mid to high vacuum situations until I eliminated the EGR valve, heat riser valve, idle mixture screw limits, AIR pump and associated hardware, the cat, and lowered the operating temperature of the engine. Yes, the EGR valve is just one component of many that can effect the driveability of your car, but if the choice is eliminate one or more-I vote to go for it on these early emissions engines. Newer cars are a totally different story-My 94 Mustang GT has every piece of emissions control on it and runs like a champ. There is no reason to eliminate this equipment on modern cars-that is the key-no reason since driveability is excellent to begin with. I would not touch any of this stuff on my 2010 Z06-NO Reason to. Not so on the emissions C3's-It's all junk.
...
Now...at low and low-mid throttle, certainly you end up with a more dilute charge and some small impact on power output. But if you're looking for power output, you're not spending much time at low and low-mid throttle, are you?
Yes & heats up the intake.
The stock non-performance guys probably spend the most time at low throttle or maybe pushing it around!
While an EGR valve has no impact on power on low vacuum running, it does make it a bit difficult in tunning at cruise. They often will give you a lean surge at cruise when the engine is leaned down as the intake charge is now displaced with exhast gases instead of fuel/air. Tuning becomes a problem because of the leanner settings on your carb jetting needed to get the engine to run ok and then still have the fuel it needs at high loads. It can be done though but not easy, Not everyone will be bothered by the way an engine runs with an EGR set up on a well tunned engine. Get rid of it if not needed for emissions testing! my .50cents.
the e.g.r valve not effecting performance is based solely on a properly opperating system, which is not common.if it isn't needed for inspection it can be a good paperweight.
While an EGR valve has no impact on power on low vacuum running, it does make it a bit difficult in tunning at cruise.
I tuned my carb to get best mileage at cruise (with EGR). Then it started acting funky at different times. Disconnected the EGR w/o any other changes and it has run great ever since.