When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Hello everybody from yet another newbie. This summer I bought a 1969 large journal 327 block and a 1979 c3, 4 spd. My first vette. My question is did chevy make any changes over that 10 span that would make the 1979 350 block a better canidate for a rebuild than the 327. So you know they both should be 2 bolt blocks and my intent is a 383 in the 400ish hp range. It would be nice to build the 327 block and still be able to enjoy the car until engine swap time. Thanks in advance for any advise.
327 is a 4 inch bore as is the 350. Stroke is a 1/4 inch longer in the 350. Either may go 4.030 or a little more. Have it sonic mapped then you'll know for sure. If the shop that does the boring has a boring bar that will offset a little they may be able to save a 0.030 final bore for you.
I don't have the casting number with me, but there is a casting number that was used for both. Doesn't matter they are the same bore. Could be the same casting number with a different crank. The 383 will just be anoth 1/4 inch, an 1/8 both directions. You're talking 0.125 each way longer than the 350 crank. The 383/350/327 only change is the stroke.
Either block will work; there's no real difference in strength between them.
Some idea of the budget for the build would help; generally I'd say if you're starting from complete scratch for a build your best bet is a later model roller-cam block. They're relatively cheap, solid blocks and being able to use the factory roller cam is a huge plus. If your power targets were a bit lower, buying a complete roller-cam block with Vortec heads would be a cheap platform for around 375 FWHP.
Either block will work; there's no real difference in strength between them.
Some idea of the budget for the build would help; generally I'd say if you're starting from complete scratch for a build your best bet is a later model roller-cam block. They're relatively cheap, solid blocks and being able to use the factory roller cam is a huge plus. If your power targets were a bit lower, buying a complete roller-cam block with Vortec heads would be a cheap platform for around 375 FWHP.
Roller cam and lifters are $500 and up.
Nice Hydraulic cam and lifters are $100 for a Summit set and $180 for name brands.
Why is it time after time you insist on over budgeting someones engine rebuild?
And he said he has a 327 and a 350, nothing was said about looking for a block.
And also he would get more power out of the 350 because of the larger cubic inch displacement.
Roller cam and lifters are $500 and up.
Nice Hydraulic cam and lifters are $100 for a Summit set and $180 for name brands.
Why is it time after time you insist on over budgeting someones engine rebuild?
And he said he has a 327 and a 350, nothing was said about looking for a block.
And also he would get more power out of the 350 because of the larger cubic inch displacement.
A roller cam is cheap power - generally even a mild hydraulic roller will deliver 20-30FWHP over a comperable flat-tappet cam. 30 HP for a couple hundred bucks is a great deal. Additionally, hydraulic roller lifters can be reused, unlike flat-tappet lifters, meaning that decent used lifters are available, and buying a used short block gets all the factory roller cam components like the spider, lifters, etc. Most of the block cost in a build will be in the machine work - so if someone's starting from scratch a roller block is by far the best investment. If someone wants to do a retrofit roller later, it's far more money due to the cost of link-bar lifters.
I noted right up front that either existing block would work.
Not sure if you caught this, but he's doing a 383 - so he's not going to get more displacement out of a 350 block
I give advice based on my engine building experience - I don't give snap answers to questions, but try to ensure I give a complete answer so the OP can make their own decisions.
And also he would get more power out of the 350 because of the larger cubic inch displacement.
Originally Posted by billla
Not sure if you caught this, but he's doing a 383 - so he's not going to get more displacement out of a 350 block
Originally Posted by Tim H
What does that mean???
Um, it means that for each block he'll be using a 3.750 stroke crank with a 4.030 bore...so both the 327 and 350 blocks will deliver the same displacement: 383 CID.
327 blocks can require a bit of Hardblok in the bottom as insurance for the clearance.
Um, it means that for each block he'll be using a 3.750 stroke crank with a 4.030 bore...so both the 327 and 350 blocks will deliver the same displacement: 383 CID.
327 blocks can require a bit of Hardblok in the bottom as insurance for the clearance.
I always thought that the large journal 327s and the 350s were identical in every way, just a different length stroke crank. Why would the 327 need Hardblok, but not a 350? Is the casting different?
I don't feel that I am hi-jacking, as this could be of interest to the OP, as well.
I always thought that the large journal 327s and the 350s were identical in every way, just a different length stroke crank. Why would the 327 need Hardblok, but not a 350? Is the casting different?
Every block is different and I can only speak from experience - the 327 blocks I worked with revealed on sonic that a bit of Hardblock was cheap insurance. Way cheaper to add 2" of HardBlock than to crack a block.
I err on the side of caution...because the price of failure is high
Um, it means that for each block he'll be using a 3.750 stroke crank with a 4.030 bore...so both the 327 and 350 blocks will deliver the same displacement: 383 CID.
327 blocks can require a bit of Hardblok in the bottom as insurance for the clearance.
OK but if you just rebuild both and over bore .030 wouldn't the 350 be a 355cid and the 327 be a 332cid?
OK but if you just rebuild both and over bore .030 wouldn't the 350 be a 355cid and the 327 be a 332cid?
Well, yeah, but what the OP is getting at is whether he should yank the 350 and turn it into a 383, or turn the 327 into a 383, and drive the car while he's building it.
If you would like my humble opinion, I would use the 327 block for the 383 build. Unless you are willing to find another block with a one-piece rear main seal and roller cam. Drive the car with it's original engine (if it is original) while you build the 383. When it's time to do the swap, yank the 350 and put it in mothballs for future use. If it's the original engine, it'll be worth saving. Sooner or later, even a '79 'vette with the original engine will be relatively rare. And if it's with the car, it's a "numbers matching" engine (whatever that means), if it's separated, it's just another Chevy 350.
Thank you all for your respective opinions. I've decided the 327 is my block to build. Scotty hit another point that was wandering in the back of my head. Storing the unmolested original block for "who knows what the future may hold"
Sooner or later, someone will be glad you saved that motor. It might be a hundred years from now, long after you and I are deep in our cold, cold graves, but sooner or later.........
Isn't there alot more work has to be done to a 327 to make it a 383?
And what block does all the parts house use in their 383 conversions.
I have never heard of using a 327 for the 383?
Whats the risks and advantages of using the 327 rather than the tried and true 350???
Isn't there alot more work has to be done to a 327 to make it a 383?
And what block does all the parts house use in their 383 conversions.
I have never heard of using a 327 for the 383?
Whats the risks and advantages of using the 327 rather than the tried and true 350???
Large Journal 302, 327 and 350 blocks are identical. In 1969 all were the same casting number 3932386. Advantage is he already has it. The late 60's early 70's blocks are good alloy. I would go retro roller with it. More power and it is cheaper than trashing your fresh build with ground up flat tappet cam lobes and lifters then starting over.