When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
From: Some days your the dog and some days your the hydrant.
Royal Canadian Navy
I have the Magnum 280 cam w/4-sp and have run it with the stock Quadrajet, Holley 4011 650 w/vacuum secondaries and currently with a Holley Street HP 650 w/mechanical secondaries. Hands down, the 650 Street HP is the most responsive and has more seat of the pants power.
For 'usual & customary' street/highway use and better fuel economy, you probably want vacuum operated secondaries. For best performance, you want mechanical secondaries.
I have the Magnum 280 cam w/4-sp and have run it with the stock Quadrajet, Holley 4011 650 w/vacuum secondaries and currently with a Holley Street HP 650 w/mechanical secondaries. Hands down, the 650 Street HP is the most responsive and has more seat of the pants power.
How do you like it? I have only been out on the streets for a few quick trips and so far it seems ok, but I am thinking my stock gears are not enough and I really don't want to switch tranny's.
Got a Crane Energizer 272H cam setup. My qjet rocks! If you are leaning toward originality, You may want to refresh the q'jet. It is VERY responsive when calibrated to your installation. Minor primary and secondary metering rods and primary jets adjustment (if your qjet is otherwise healthy) and you WILL be surprised.
In case anyone is confused about it, the Q-Jet secondaries are mechanical. Depending on its configuration, there may be either a vacuum or a mechanical 'limiter' that prevents the secondaries from opening when they should not, but if the engine is warmed up and functioning properly, the secondary throttle plates open completely with WOT demand. Yes, there is also an airvalve at the entry to the secondary venturi, but if properly adjusted, that just makes an optimum transition from a 'low power' to 'full power' condition; it does not reduce engine performance. That airvalve also allows the Q-Jet to work for nearly any sized engine without major modification to the carb (as long as the engine airflow requirements do not exceed the maximum capacity of the carb).
When properly set up, any good carb will produce nearly equal "WOT performance". But, doing that as well as operating efficiently during "daily" operation is something the Q-Jet can do that most others cannot.
Last edited by 7T1vette; Jan 24, 2012 at 10:42 PM.
From: Some days your the dog and some days your the hydrant.
Royal Canadian Navy
Originally Posted by Bruthish
How do you like it? I have only been out on the streets for a few quick trips and so far it seems ok, but I am thinking my stock gears are not enough and I really don't want to switch tranny's.
I also have the M21 close ratio and 3.55 rear. The carb sits on an adapter plate on top of a spreadbore Edelbrock Performer intake (1995 vintage). I will soon be removing the intake and heads and replacing them with AFR 195 Street Eliminator's and a Weiand Team G single plane intake. Can't wait to try that out! Next year I will install a roller cam and in a few years more a 427 small block. I'm not concerned with originality, price of gas nor gas mileage as the car is a weekend only driver.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.