When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I have a serpentine from an ’89 donor and will be running it without air conditioning (for now) so I’m looking at rerouting the belt. Below are diagrams of the current and proposed routing. I have the reverse rotation pump now so if I go with the 2nd routing I’ll need to get a standard rotation pump and fab up a bracket for the new location of the tensioner. The body is off so I have lots of room to experiment.
Please give it a look and let me know if you see any potential problems or have any other ideas.
Thanks
Remove the compressor and replace with an idler pulley. That way if you want to add AC later, it's an easy swap.
Or reorient the tensioner to pull up towards the 10:00 position like LS motors.
According to your diagram you'll also have to fabricate a smooth pulley for your power steering pump since it's going to get the smooth side of the belt instead of the ribbed side. If you run the smooth side over a grooved pulley you'll experience faster wear. That brings up another issue. You're already dealing with a minimum of belt contact on each pulley and going with a smooth belt side on a smooth pull with such a lack of contact might result in a lot of slippage. That could cause problems with your power steering and will certainly generate a lot of noise, heat, and additional belt wear.
According to your diagram you'll also have to fabricate a smooth pulley for your power steering pump since it's going to get the smooth side of the belt instead of the ribbed side. If you run the smooth side over a grooved pulley you'll experience faster wear. That brings up another issue. You're already dealing with a minimum of belt contact on each pulley and going with a smooth belt side on a smooth pull with such a lack of contact might result in a lot of slippage. That could cause problems with your power steering and will certainly generate a lot of noise, heat, and additional belt wear.
That's how it came from the factory on the C4s. If you look carefully at the diagrams, the top one is the factory set-up, and the power steering pump is the same on both diagrams. Don't ask me why, it just is. Sorry to "call you out" like that, dude, I'm not trying to be a jerk, or a know-it-all, or anything.
I have the same serp setup on my '80, from an '87 'vette, and I'm thinking about getting rid of the air conditioning, too. I think the cheapest and easiest way out is an A/C delete pulley:
Does that C4 setup actually fit? It looks like the alternator would run into the upper control arm mount. I know the low-profile setup used on the Camaro/Firebird and a number of sedans fits, I have one in my car. It leaves everything in the original positions as the C3.
That's how it came from the factory on the C4s. If you look carefully at the diagrams, the top one is the factory set-up, and the power steering pump is the same on both diagrams. Don't ask me why, it just is. Sorry to "call you out" like that, dude, I'm not trying to be a jerk, or a know-it-all, or anything.
That isn't "calling me out" at all so don't feel bad. I just didn't know that the C4 serpentine system used a smooth power steering pulley. I'm rather amazed that GM would do that. I would think it would slip and squeal badly.
Grooved pulleys run on the grooved side of the belt. Smooth pulleys run on the smooth side. Tension and the rubber compound of the belt keeps it all from slipping. P/S runs on the "back" of the belt.
TPI C4 belt drives are a bolt on in any C3 accessory delete pulleys are another story, I know the air pump delete is easy....a/c delete I know nothing about....
there are no control arm problems...plenty of clearance.....
A/C delete is easy, just get on eBay and buy one of the proper delete pulleys. It has a bracket that bolts into the frame in place of the compressor. I have one on the F-body/sedan serpentine system in my 77 for now.
What are the advantages of using a serpentine system over the old multi belt system?
If you lose the one belt you are out of action.
I am still acquiring parts for my project so now would be a good time for me to switch over.
Thanks for any input.
And thanks to all that posted pics and links.
What are the advantages of using a serpentine system over the old multi belt system?
If you lose the one belt you are out of action.
I am still acquiring parts for my project so now would be a good time for me to switch over.
Thanks for any input.
And thanks to all that posted pics and links.
Bman
It's true, there is a single point of failure for a serp belt setup, but the serp belt is much, much more reliable than an older style belt. If you don't run a tensioner, you lose some of this reliability, tho.
It's true, there is a single point of failure for a serp belt setup, but the serp belt is much, much more reliable than an older style belt. If you don't run a tensioner, you lose some of this reliability, tho.
The original factory setup (in the first picture) all fits with no issues; I test fitted it all prior to powdercoating the brackets. All the rest of the A/C inside the body is removed (for now) so I’m trying to delete pulleys and reduce belt flapping distance between pulleys.
If I go with the A/C delete pulley I’ll also need a smog pump delete pulley and bracket; this is because the angle of the belt coming off the alternator will hit the power steering pump pulley on the way to the water pump pulley.
The only issues I see are:
Changing to a standard rotation water pump and the smooth water pump pulley riding on the ribbed side of the belt in the second picture (my drawing) all the other pulleys are riding on the correct side of the belt
Fabbing of the tensioner pulley bracket in the only place I can see it fitting (also in the second drawing.)
I won’t be back to the car until Tue or Wed I’ll take some pictures and post what I think it will look like.
Thanks oldalaskaman, looks like 98Red’s post #6 (less the tensioner pulley) is exactly what I’m thinking of.
Thanks to everyone for the comments and the links so far; keep them coming.
The original factory setup (in the first picture) all fits with no issues; I test fitted it all prior to powdercoating the brackets. All the rest of the A/C inside the body is removed (for now) so I’m trying to delete pulleys and reduce belt flapping distance between pulleys.
If I go with the A/C delete pulley I’ll also need a smog pump delete pulley and bracket; this is because the angle of the belt coming off the alternator will hit the power steering pump pulley on the way to the water pump pulley.
The only issues I see are:
Changing to a standard rotation water pump and the smooth water pump pulley riding on the ribbed side of the belt in the second picture (my drawing) all the other pulleys are riding on the correct side of the belt
Fabbing of the tensioner pulley bracket in the only place I can see it fitting (also in the second drawing.)
I won’t be back to the car until Tue or Wed I’ll take some pictures and post what I think it will look like.
Thanks oldalaskaman, looks like 98Red’s post #6 (less the tensioner pulley) is exactly what I’m thinking of.
Thanks to everyone for the comments and the links so far; keep them coming.
I have the '87 Corvette serp setup, with an air pump delete pulley that I fabbed from some plans I found on the internet, with the help of a friend's Dad who is a machinist. You could probably fab a tensioner based on something similar to the air pump delete bracket, (sorry, no pics) and re-use the tensioner that is presently mounted on the A/C bracket. If (When!) you come up with a good design, please share it, I think I would be very interested in possibly doing the same thing. Getting rid of the A/C bracket entirely would free up some room to mount a fuel filter in-line to the carb, which would be a nice side benefit.
That isn't "calling me out" at all so don't feel bad. I just didn't know that the C4 serpentine system used a smooth power steering pulley. I'm rather amazed that GM would do that. I would think it would slip and squeal badly.
From the looks of it, that PS pulley has grooves in it, if I am seeing this correctly, the set-up is WRONG!
This is a very rough prototype of a bracket I’m considering building out of aluminum. It’s a bit large at this point but I wanted to make sure the tensioner from the Firebird or Camaro I stumbled across on my junkyard run the other day: Junkyard Post I would like to run the tensioner to get some more belt contact with the water pump pulley (which I need to find a ribbed one.) I’m not sure what would be a good thickness for the aluminum the template is 3/4 plywood; probably a little thick for the bracket though. I have no idea at this point what thickness aluminum stock even comes in. I’m throwing this out here for some suggestions / criticism. My wife does a little autocad so I figured I’d have her draw it up and find a machinist or try and cut it out myself.