C3 Tech/Performance V8 Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Basic Tech and Maintenance for the C3 Corvette
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Motor Oil "Wear Test" and "Lab Test" Data

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-26-2022, 07:10 AM
  #341  
lionelhutz
Race Director
 
lionelhutz's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2007
Location: South Western Ontario
Posts: 11,061
Received 845 Likes on 721 Posts

Default

Well, it's now very obvious you don't actual read and comprehend, but rather just want to argue.

Originally Posted by lionelhutz
Film strength and what an additive like zinc provides are 2 different things. To put it really simply, the film is the basic oil stock providing protection between 2 moving surfaces. Under enough pressure, it is compressed and squeezed out until the barrier additives (like zinc) are needed to protect the 2 surfaces from damaging contact.
Film strength does not prevent metal to metal contact, the barrier additives do. Read the above again and then what you quoted in a feeble attempt to prove me wrong and try to comprehend what it means this time. Both he and you are already wrong with the argument that film strength is the what predicts when metal to metal contact will occur..
Old 08-26-2022, 11:36 AM
  #342  
HandOverFist
Banned Scam/Spammer

 
HandOverFist's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2015
Location: right here
Posts: 1,413
Received 227 Likes on 133 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lionelhutz
Well, it's now very obvious you don't actual read and comprehend, but rather just want to argue.



Film strength does not prevent metal to metal contact, the barrier additives do. Read the above again and then what you quoted in a feeble attempt to prove me wrong and try to comprehend what it means this time. Both he and you are already wrong with the argument that film strength is the what predicts when metal to metal contact will occur..
It is you that failed to read...the film strength tests were conducted with all additives in place as they would be. Argument is totally on you. It is also clear you don't have a understanding how these additives actually come into play. ZDDP is a last ditch barrier when the film is compromised...utterly simple minded to say film strength does not prevent metal to metal contact. Using your analogy oils before ZDDP was introduced did nothing to prevent metal to metal contact lol. The additive package's in all of the oils tested account for the wide results found...your feeble attempt to separate film strength and additives is transparent at best. Again, the burden is on you to disprove the results...anyone else run any tests lately?

Last edited by HandOverFist; 08-26-2022 at 09:02 PM.
Old 08-26-2022, 02:54 PM
  #343  
lionelhutz
Race Director
 
lionelhutz's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2007
Location: South Western Ontario
Posts: 11,061
Received 845 Likes on 721 Posts

Default

You apparently have no clue about burden or proof or what an argument from ignorance is. It's up to the person making claims to prove they are right, not the other way around.

It's also clear you don't understand the generally accepted meaning of oil film strength. Doing some secret "film strength" test doesn't change the industry accepted meaning of film strength. Film strength is mostly dictated by the oil weight and temperature. Additives don't change it, because they're not part of what makes up film strength. I suggest you at least get a overview learning of what film strength is before you continue arguing about it. Might as well learn that writing barrier additives doesn't just mean ZDDP at the same time.
Old 08-26-2022, 03:17 PM
  #344  
HandOverFist
Banned Scam/Spammer

 
HandOverFist's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2015
Location: right here
Posts: 1,413
Received 227 Likes on 133 Posts
Default

Once again you dance around with word play and are dead wrong about additives not playing into film strength. All oils contain additive packages and it is well known that ZDDP is just one component. You simply can't accept the tests validity based on what you think you know. There is no argument...disprove the findings with actual tests instead of worn out catch phrases. All oils are not equal for a reason.
Old 08-26-2022, 03:21 PM
  #345  
lionelhutz
Race Director
 
lionelhutz's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2007
Location: South Western Ontario
Posts: 11,061
Received 845 Likes on 721 Posts

Default

You make the claim, you must prove it is right (or wrong).
Old 08-26-2022, 03:27 PM
  #346  
HandOverFist
Banned Scam/Spammer

 
HandOverFist's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2015
Location: right here
Posts: 1,413
Received 227 Likes on 133 Posts
Default

As I suspected...you have nothing. You may insert foot in mouth after that "additives don't contribute to film strength" statement.
Old 08-26-2022, 03:50 PM
  #347  
lionelhutz
Race Director
 
lionelhutz's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2007
Location: South Western Ontario
Posts: 11,061
Received 845 Likes on 721 Posts

Default

You make the claim, you must prove it is right (or wrong). This will never change, no matter how much you attack it.

No dancing here. Film strength is how the oil would create a hydrodynamic bearing layer as an example. Barrier additives protect when the film is broken, by being crushed between the camshaft and lifter as an example. I can't actually understand what you're actually arguing, but it seems to be that the barrier additives were being actually tested, not the film strength.

Whatever, I'm done with the horseshit arguments claiming that when someone posts something I have to prove they are wrong. The world doesn't work that way.

Last edited by lionelhutz; 08-26-2022 at 03:57 PM.
Old 08-26-2022, 04:25 PM
  #348  
HandOverFist
Banned Scam/Spammer

 
HandOverFist's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2015
Location: right here
Posts: 1,413
Received 227 Likes on 133 Posts
Default

By all means, go in ignorance then. The real problem is some are living in a fantasy world.

Last edited by HandOverFist; 08-26-2022 at 04:32 PM.
Old 08-26-2022, 05:08 PM
  #349  
HandOverFist
Banned Scam/Spammer

 
HandOverFist's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2015
Location: right here
Posts: 1,413
Received 227 Likes on 133 Posts
Default

Back to reality - For those that might have glossed over the prior link I provided... https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...01679X19303214

This suggests that too much of a good thing can actually do harm. This should be a good read for those building a new engine as well as the classic car folks...all things in moderation. It would appear that even the most recent oils can easily protect flat tappet engines. Of course I have already demonstrated this recently in this thread... https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums...uld-i-use.html

Last edited by HandOverFist; 08-27-2022 at 07:12 PM.
Old 08-26-2022, 05:11 PM
  #350  
lionelhutz
Race Director
 
lionelhutz's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2007
Location: South Western Ontario
Posts: 11,061
Received 845 Likes on 721 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HandOverFist
By all means, go in ignorance then. The real problem is some are living in a fantasy world.
Yup, it's working for you.
Old 08-26-2022, 05:13 PM
  #351  
HandOverFist
Banned Scam/Spammer

 
HandOverFist's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2015
Location: right here
Posts: 1,413
Received 227 Likes on 133 Posts
Default

What? Thought you were done...come back when you have something interesting to contribute.
Old 08-27-2022, 11:02 AM
  #352  
lionelhutz
Race Director
 
lionelhutz's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2007
Location: South Western Ontario
Posts: 11,061
Received 845 Likes on 721 Posts

Default

This thread was stickied to avoid the forum spamming this clown was doing by giving him a single place to post his crap. For a while there were posts every few days with mostly the same crap except for a few new results added. Considering that seems to have stopped, this sticky should really be dumped from the sticky list.
Old 08-27-2022, 11:43 AM
  #353  
vettebuyer6369
Administrator
 
vettebuyer6369's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2000
Location: About 1100 miles from where I call home. Blue lives matter.
Posts: 51,437
Received 5,343 Likes on 2,779 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by lionelhutz
This thread was stickied to avoid the forum spamming this clown was doing by giving him a single place to post his crap. For a while there were posts every few days with mostly the same crap except for a few new results added. Considering that seems to have stopped, this sticky should really be dumped from the sticky list.
An odd post from someone whose posted here 9 times this month. Probably no need to attack someone from 2012 either.

Maybe you and HandOver should take a break from this argument instead of creeping towards earning hostility and personal attack violations. Theres lots of other threads on the site.
Old 08-27-2022, 06:59 PM
  #354  
lionelhutz
Race Director
 
lionelhutz's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2007
Location: South Western Ontario
Posts: 11,061
Received 845 Likes on 721 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by vettebuyer6369
An odd post from someone whose posted here 9 times this month. Probably no need to attack someone from 2012 either..
3/2021 was the last post. The craziness caused by these posts is over which would make the need for sticky over.
Old 08-27-2022, 07:33 PM
  #355  
HandOverFist
Banned Scam/Spammer

 
HandOverFist's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2015
Location: right here
Posts: 1,413
Received 227 Likes on 133 Posts
Default

Odd...last post in this Sticky was in 2013. I have not seen any clamor to close it to date... https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums...t-oils-31.html



Quick Reply: Motor Oil "Wear Test" and "Lab Test" Data



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:16 PM.