When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I really don't like the way the old "stock" manifold looks with those shiny new Sportsman II heads on our 350 rebuild. Besides which, the old manifold has pretty beat up laying around the shed for the past 6 months.
Because we're mainly going to drive it on the street, we're looking for a dual plane manifold. I'm thinking probably iron because the heads are iron, and an iron manifold won't have the difference in expansion that an aluminum one would. But this is the first time I've actually swapped out the manifold, so I'm out of my experience base here.
There's really no reason to go with an iron intake manifold. An aluminum manifold will be a lot lighter and will dissipate heat much better. Depending on your setup the Edelbrock Performer (2101) is a very nice dual plane intake.
*Edit*
I'm not even sure if there are any "performance" oriented cast iron intake manifolds. The stock cast iron one that you have will most likely restrict the performance of your setup. Aluminum is definitely the way to go.
Bence is spot on... The performer is hard to beat. I've had them on everything from a 289 Fort to a 455 Poncho and they've always worked great.
They do pretty much give up around 5500 rpm but I don't go there more than a couple times a week. Their punch down low is really useful :D
Plus, they can be bought dirt cheap :cool:
There's really no reason to go with an iron intake manifold.
[Modified by bence13_33, 10:46 PM 5/24/2002]
You may be right - as I said, this is out of my experience base. But I do know that AL expands from heating at about twice the rate that iron does. Also, iron/AL setups have the dissimilar metals battery effect (remember your freshman chemistry - that's why you have to make sure you change coolant/flush those AL radiators regularly).
Also, IF I remember correctly, Chevy had some trouble with the original 4.3L engines (which are basically a small block V8 with 2 cylinders cut off) with Al manifolds leaking when mounted on the iron block/heads.
Like I said, that's why I'm considering iron. But I really don't know, so need experienced advice on this one.
The Edelbrock Performer (2101) or Performer RPM are good, as is the Weiand #8004 (all are aluminum). If you have the hood clearance (LT-1/BB hood required), Holley makes a replica of the LT-1 intake that works very well through higher RPMs and with taller gears (i.e. 3.55:1 +).
Bence is spot on... The performer is hard to beat. I've had them on everything from a 289 Fort to a 455 Poncho and they've always worked great.
They do pretty much give up around 5500 rpm but I don't go there more than a couple times a week. Their punch down low is really useful :D
Plus, they can be bought dirt cheap :cool:
As you said - the Performer is a good Intake to 5500 RPM. However - it KILLS performance above 5500... If you are planning to get some more HP out of your engine (and With Sportsman II Heads it should be easily possible) - you limit your potential HP by using a performer. Go with the PERFORMER RPM!! It has similar performance at lower RPM's and makes good power through 6500!
:cheers:
Olivier
P.S. You'll need a drop base air filter for the Performer RPM (if you don't have a L-88 style hood)
A Weiand "Action Plus" does it for me ($88.95). Will accept either a spread bore or Square bore carb and does fit under my '76 Hood. Did have to shorten the Air Cleaner stud tho.......Some folks say that the Performer RPM wont fit under a Vette Hood unless its an L-88 Hood......I'd hate to find out the hard way........ :eek: :eek: :eek:
A Weiand "Action Plus" does it for me ($88.95). Will accept either a spread bore or Square bore carb and does fit under my '76 Hood. Did have to shorten the Air Cleaner stud tho.......Some folks say that the Performer RPM wont fit under a Vette Hood unless its an L-88 Hood......I'd hate to find out the hard way........ :eek: :eek: :eek:
I've seen a Performer RPM in a 74 Vette with stock hood and drop base K&N Air Filter!!
Clink69 and i both have RPM Airgaps under standard hoods with the same drop base airfilter.....so the lower performer rpm will DEFINATELY fit....john :chevy
Clink69 and i both have RPM Airgaps under standard hoods with the same drop base airfilter.....so the lower performer rpm will DEFINATELY fit....john :chevy
What kind of carb are you using? I wonder if I will need a adapter plate (additional height) for my Holley... I think that the RPM was designed for Edelbrock Carbs...
Not sure about the RPM but I had a holley 650 double pumper on my performer.
Well - the Performer accepts any Carb. However - the RPM doesn't accept any Carb. I assume that it was designed for Edelbrock Carbs... Therefore I think that I will need a adapter plate for my Holley!
When running a Performer RPM manifold with a Holley, you usually need to run a thick gasket. I don't remember exactly what hits, but it might be the accellerator pump housing or the power valve cover- anyway, something hits unless you raise the carb up 1/4".
Chevy makes a cast iron version of the old (hard to beat) LT-1 intake. Its listed in the GM performance catalog. It accepts both square & spread bore carbs, and will still retain the choke. I have one and love it . Yes its heavy, though I would put up against anything Edelbrock or Weiand has. Its good to 6500 RPM as well.
Sportsman II heads are pretty big heads for a 350 - 200cc intake runners. Stock GM heads are in the 150-170 cc range to give some idea of how much larger the ports are (significant!). A Performer or other stock replacement (#1256 gasket style) intakes are going to have smaller runners than the heads and basically constitute a mis-matched combination (those intakes are designed with more velocity and less raw flow in mind). A better matched combination would be an RPM (large dual plane) or Victor Jr. (moderate single plane). 200 cc heads on a 350 are meant for making power higher in the RPM range - so if that is what you are trying to do then finish it off with a matching intake and cam. If you are going for a mild or moderate 350 (a warm street motor) you may want to rethink your head purchase.
isnt there a hood clearence problem with the performer manifold on a stock set-up..thats what has kept me away with replacing my stock one :confused:
No! I've fitted one to my '81 & have got no clearance problems at all (even after removing all the rubber spacers under the hood so that it sits lower).
Paul
I have a Summit Crosswind (which is made by performance Plus) under my Speed Demon Carb. The Crosswind is polished and looks nice. Its a knock off of the RPM Airgap and performs well on my engine. I have a drop base air cleaner and can close the big block/lt1 hood with no troube (which has just a tad more clearance than the stock hood did). I've also read that there is no difference in height between the RPM and the RPM air gap.
The new Performer EPS also fits under a stock hood. It is a dual plane square bore only intake, and has all the ports for all the accessories. I have a 750 Holley with a drop base air cleaner and did the putty test. Got over 1 1/2" clearance at the front end of the 14" drop base air cleaner. Many choices for you.... Good luck :cheers: :cheers:
Eddie