is this a mucie ?
Thread Starter
Racer
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
From: holland
is this a mucie ?
I got a 1974 4 speed convertible I looked under the car and saw this standing on the side of my gearbox
13 04 065 903
w.g. div
F.c1
The dot behind the f is a small round o
Someone told me it’s a Muncie but I can't find that number on the Muncie site
thanx..
13 04 065 903
w.g. div
F.c1
The dot behind the f is a small round o
Someone told me it’s a Muncie but I can't find that number on the Muncie site
thanx..
Thread Starter
Racer
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
From: holland
Re: is this a mucie ? (Pete79L82)
I see
Not many people have those I guess I tried to search on the forum but found 3 topics on it and they where any good :(
Do they got a site
and is Borg-Warner trans really that bad?
Not many people have those I guess I tried to search on the forum but found 3 topics on it and they where any good :(
Do they got a site
and is Borg-Warner trans really that bad?
Drifting
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,825
Likes: 56
From: Shawano WI
Re: is this a mucie ? (danzig74c)
The crossover year for Covettes was 74. They could come with either an Muncie or a Borg Warner. After 74, all C3 manual trans were Borg Warner Super T-10's. They are a good transmission and have a lot of choices for gear sets. They were also used in Fords and AMC products for many years. The early Borg Warners (pre 1965) were a little weak but there is nothing wrong strength wise with a Super T-10.
[Modified by Pete79L82, 6:59 PM 6/3/2002]
[Modified by Pete79L82, 6:59 PM 6/3/2002]
Melting Slicks
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,341
Likes: 6
Re: is this a mucie ? (danzig74c)
. . . is Borg-Warner trans really that bad?
It is an excellent transmission!
They are now made by Richmond gear - http://www.richmondgear.com/cat/supert10.html
