When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
NO! he has overdrive. /
I'd expect the xe268 to surge at 1000-2000 rpm in 4th locked due to excessive overlap.
Matt,
I have enjoyed this discussion. I am interested in it because I already have the xe268. I have seen others who run this cam with an OD transmission and I am about to install a 2004R myself. So, please understand that I now need more info on the subject now.
65 mph with stock tires and a 2004R with lock up with a 3.55 or 3.70 is going to spin the motor about 2000 rpm.
I want to hear from others with this cam and overdrives and how the cam behaves and if they keep it in 3rd in town or what. (If I don't see anybody respond I will respectfully start a new thread on that subject)
NO! he has overdrive. He will turn MUCH LOWER rpm cruising around in 4th. Does his converter LOCK? Even less rpm.
I'd expect the xe268 to surge at 1000-2000 rpm in 4th locked due to excessive overlap. Maybe that can be tuned out, maybe not. No problem with the XE262H or the 270H with a fully divided dual plane. Excessive overlap (xe268) causes poor MPG, long warm-ups, and less power at normal street rpm's.
I'm an ASE certified mechanic(retired). Certified in ENGINE PERFORMANCE. People proud of their accomplishments use their real name, like Jeff(and me, and many others )
What are mako's qualifications?
XE268 don't have excessive overlap @ 53. It is a mild hydraulic street cam with an operating range of 1600-5800 rpm. Not radical by any means. The 270H your recommending has an operating range of 1800-5800. I understand your position and actually would like to see him use the XE268 with a 112 LSA, That would reduce overlap to 51 and flatten the torque curve. I like larger LSA cams with automatics for that reason.
My real name and experience are listed in my profile. Been building race and street cars for 40 years now. Still have no clue who Jeff is or why his opinion matters.
mako
Just google his name and spend a few hours reading his posts. I look for posters that do their own research and testing. Your Q was good enough that i PM'ed him for the first time. I gave his name/post as a source, rather than just giving my conclusion that the 270h is a great cam too. I have the 270h for 18 years in my 61, and i can't think of any way that a cam change can improve that combo. But, as i said before, i thought it was out of date. Since i was wrong about that, i provided my source. Jeff did back to back testing and he is a valuable source of information.
CompCams just released their new 4 pattern cams. Their job is to make money selling us new "state of the art" cams. They have to make them look really different to make the sale. They make logical arguments why the new cams are far superior. Guys like Jeff check them out to see if it is true.
Matt,
I have enjoyed this discussion. I am interested in it because I already have the xe268. I have seen others who run this cam with an OD transmission and I am about to install a 2004R myself. So, please understand that I now need more info on the subject now.
65 mph with stock tires and a 2004R with lock up with a 3.55 or 3.70 is going to spin the motor about 2000 rpm.
I want to hear from others with this cam and overdrives and how the cam behaves and if they keep it in 3rd in town or what. (If I don't see anybody respond I will respectfully start a new thread on that subject)
There is a good chance that any bad manners can be tuned out.
The acid test is climbing an overpass in OD locked. Can it maintain speed without unlocking? or downshifting. If u read Bee Jay's old story, i'm optimistic.
He filled in the divider and cured the problem. 2000 rpm is high(easy to fix)
my 270h has good response even at 1000, part throttle, tho i don't have OD. I'm sure you will get a variety of replys. Minimum connection between the 2 planes is the key to sucess.(to reduce cam egr)
Last edited by Matt Gruber; Nov 19, 2012 at 11:18 AM.
From: Who says "Nothing is impossible" ? I've been doing nothing for years.
Originally Posted by AirborneSilva
Ron Capps has never won a Championship
I meant Schumacher but it doesn't really matter , how many times did you Google Capps before you posted to make sure ? He's been in 77 Final rounds, it's crap like this that makes this forum stink, people waiting in weeds until someone makes an error.
I meant Schumacher but it doesn't really matter , how many times did you Google Capps before you posted to make sure ? He's been in 77 Final rounds, it's crap like this that makes this forum stink, people waiting in weeds until someone makes an error.
I goggled Capps exactly 0 times, no need to get upset that I corrected you I just happened to know is all
From: Who says "Nothing is impossible" ? I've been doing nothing for years.
Originally Posted by AirborneSilva
I goggled Capps exactly 0 times, no need to get upset that I corrected you I just happened to know is all
I made the mistake in the name, it was not really the name that matters it was the point I was trying to make. Capps has been in the finals 77 times and regardless of coming home with the hardware that is a champion
Matt Gruber has been around a long time, he thinks outside the box. That means he doesn't read a lot of BS Hot Rod rags etc. and does things his way I have the ultimate respect for a person like that. Good to have you back Matt
As far as the four pattern cam is concerned, these people are out to make money, period. This is going to be another intellectual BS concern. Dual pattern is good, four pattern must be better. One blade razor is good so a 5 blade razor must be better. I have not read any thing about this new four pattern cam yet but I can tell you this already it ain't going in any motor I build.
I do know you need two lifts on a cylinder and how that is done is up to the buyer of the cam, I run a dual pattern only because the cam I wanted only came that way. The 270-280H single pattern cams are dynamite the rest of it is trying to make you believe what they have is superior to another cam and will go to no lengths to prove their point.
Last edited by MotorHead; Nov 19, 2012 at 11:59 AM.
It's all good MotorHead, wasn't trying to slam you
I am a big fan of Schumacher Racing, whenever the wife and I go to the races Jack invites us into his pits, we've gone up to the line in the chase car with them too. the wife has made motivational speeches with Jack in the hospitality tents too. Most of the people that work for Schumacher are good people, with the exception of one of the drivers (not Ron), and one of the crew chiefs that no longer works for him anyway...
In my opinion single pattern cams and dual pattern cams both have their place. If your Intake/exhaust ratio is real good and you are running open headers or a big exhaust with very low restriction (like in a race engine) a single pattern cam will outperform a dual pattern in many instances. This also shows up on the dyno but dyno headers are not street exhaust. If you are running stock heads or poor I/E ratio heads and restrictive exhaust you will do better with a split duration cam. Forced induction and nitrous are always split duration with a bigger split. The XE268 has a bigger split than I would recommend with good I/E heads and free flowing exhaust but likely better in a street application with the OP's heads than a single pattern. Off the shelf cams are always a compromise.
From: Who says "Nothing is impossible" ? I've been doing nothing for years.
Originally Posted by 63mako
In my opinion single pattern cams and dual pattern cams both have their place. If your Intake/exhaust ratio is real good and you are running open headers or a big exhaust with very low restriction (like in a race engine) a single pattern cam will outperform a dual pattern in many instances. This also shows up on the dyno but dyno headers are not street exhaust. If you are running stock heads or poor I/E ratio heads and restrictive exhaust you will do better with a split duration cam. Forced induction and nitrous are always split duration with a bigger split. The XE268 has a bigger split than I would recommend with good I/E heads and free flowing exhaust but likely better in a street application with the OP's heads than a single pattern. Off the shelf cams are always a compromise.
Opinons are like you know what, everyone has one. Your opinion is yours, back it up with some technical data and I will lean one way or the other. Just saying something doesn't make it true. I'm going to shorten the intellectual BS ( definition: where something sounds like it makes sense and I being a brilliant person I am will go along with it without testing it for myself, collecting data and coming up with the correct answer ) and just call IBS
I have been building engines since the early 70's. Have I built some duds ( you betcha ) but most if not all were cleared up buy changing parts to the correct ones and tuning. I now build 600+HP small blocks that you can get it and not have clue as to how much power is under your right foot, until you try it. I build them so they don't overheat, they start easy and you can toll around town all day in 90deg temp. Then without shutting it off you can go directly to the staging lanes of a dragstrip and beat about anyone that turned up that night
Thanks Wayne!(motorhead) I always look forward to reading your posts! You have done lots of cool things to your c3
.
i think i'll hold off, and wait for the 8 pattern cam
I'll put it in a C8
Edit,
i agree, lot's of IBS out there. Sounds so logical, it has to be true. NOT
Last edited by Matt Gruber; Nov 19, 2012 at 02:29 PM.
mako
Just google his name and spend a few hours reading his posts. I look for posters that do their own research and testing. Your Q was good enough that i PM'ed him for the first time. I gave his name/post as a source, rather than just giving my conclusion that the 270h is a great cam too. I have the 270h for 18 years in my 61, and i can't think of any way that a cam change can improve that combo. But, as i said before, i thought it was out of date. Since i was wrong about that, i provided my source. Jeff did back to back testing and he is a valuable source of information.
CompCams just released their new 4 pattern cams. Their job is to make money selling us new "state of the art" cams. They have to make them look really different to make the sale. They make logical arguments why the new cams are far superior. Guys like Jeff check them out to see if it is true.
Cam King ( mike Jones ) said specialty cam grinders have been doing 4 pattern cams since the early 1980s very old nascar proven tech. He laughed when he heard comp was going to sell them as the latest greatest thing lol. He seems to have been grinding cams for pro stock racers to nascar to circle track to drag racing. To many other variables to say one cam is really better then another. Trying to insult someone or make a point with something you learned from someone else is a little on the comical side then say i'm ex certified to pass on others findings as the gospel on cams. Think ill run out put 21 degree total timing in the lawn mower for my latest test lol. That retarded it should turn the exhaust pipe cherry red. I missed out on lawnmowers changing states and schools can someone help me.
Last edited by Little Mouse; Nov 19, 2012 at 06:14 PM.
.
As far as the four pattern cam is concerned, these people are out to make money, period. This is going to be another intellectual BS concern. .
this is like golf clubs, every year, something better has to come out(supposedly better) to get guys to pull $400-$500 out of their wallet for a new driver
All set to order my cam, an XE268H was my final choice. I have Edelbrock E-Street heads, Performer Intake, Hollly 4175 carb, Supercomp Header, 200r4 trans w/2400 stall (stall still to be ordered) and 3.70 rear gear. All on or going on a 76 L82, stock bottom end, new rings and bearings less then 5000 miles ago. Then another forum member suggested I get a XE262H with 1.6 rocker on the intake side only - said it was worth 10HP. Any thoughts before I place my order?
From: Who says "Nothing is impossible" ? I've been doing nothing for years.
Originally Posted by Doug1
this is like golf clubs, every year, something better has to come out(supposedly better) to get guys to pull $400-$500 out of their wallet for a new driver
I still have the Callaway Big Bertha, and the rest of clubs are broken in half trying to get the ball back on the fairway, I throw the ball onto the green if I am off far enough they can't see me
First instincts usually work for me, so still leaning toward the XE268H, although the 270H still looks good. The only reason that I'm even doing this is that I bought the Edelbrock E-Street heads from another forum member at 1/2 price, and yes, they are brand new. I already have the gear in the rear, the 200R4 is in the garage - just need a cam/lifter, timing chain, and push rods and gaskets and I'm good to go. First set of Alum heads I've ever had and am surprised at the differences of opinion about a cam. I just want something that pulls hard with the capacity of these heads, idles well, no vacuum issues, and I can use my OD trans with - and it must pull my wifes 2011 full size Silverado off the line - she laughs at me everytime she does. oh yeah - and the VOODOO stuff looks good also - sooooo????
If you went with Lunati would you do a Voodoo 60102 or 60103?
I would go with the 60102. I'm not sure my valve springs are up to the voodoo cam - just never looked at it. I can't remember the formula for figuring spring rate but I believe that the E-Streets valve spring rate is 444 and 462 is required for that cam. Don't ask me what that number means, IDK, and I may be way off.
udharold is the guy who designed the Voodoo cams for Holley which changed to Lunati. Looks like he is still designing cams but does not work for a major cam company. He puts his phone number in the post, you can call the guy who designed the cams. He may even custom design you one to work with your combo.
My next cam will probably be the 60102 also. But this is interesting.