When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
. . . I am setting up my '75 for the occasional autocross and I am down to heim end strut rods. My question is, what if any benefit will going with the Smart Strut with heim ends set-up versus just the heim end struts give me.
From: Graceland in a Not Correctly Restored Stingray
Heims are the way to go for AX/RR tracking, but while you're at it IMCO you should also eliminate the eccentrics, as they just don't stay put very well under heavy cornering loads.
FWIW, the default camber gain setting should be to locate the inner links 1/2" below stock height relative to the diff, which is pretty much at the top of the SS bracket's slot. The lower are these links, the less [negative] camber gain you'll have, but the only place where you want to eliminate/minimize gain is at the drag strip.
As an alternative, you could just get a strut kit w/camber lock plates (which eliminate the eccentrics) and fab up a simple 1/2" (or other thickness as you see fit) spacer to put above your stock bracket.
Heims are the way to go for AX/RR tracking, but while you're at it IMCO you should also eliminate the eccentrics, as they just don't stay put very well under heavy cornering loads.
FWIW, the default camber gain setting should be to locate the inner links 1/2" below stock height relative to the diff, which is pretty much at the top of the SS bracket's slot. The lower are these links, the less [negative] camber gain you'll have, but the only place where you want to eliminate/minimize gain is at the drag strip.
As an alternative, you could just get a strut kit w/camber lock plates (which eliminate the eccentrics) and fab up a simple 1/2" (or other thickness as you see fit) spacer to put above your stock bracket.
Thanks for the input guys.
As far as eliminating the eccentrics, it looks like the VBP racing strut rods com with a square plate which, I assume, does just that. Is this correct?
I tried to contact VBP directly but they're on east coast time and gone for the day.
From: Graceland in a Not Correctly Restored Stingray
Originally Posted by joerob727
Thanks for the input guys.
As far as eliminating the eccentrics, it looks like the VBP racing strut rods com with a square plate which, I assume, does just that. Is this correct?
I tried to contact VBP directly but they're on east coast time and gone for the day.
Yes, those square plates are the camber lock plates which eliminated the eccentrics. Thing is, by locating the inner link at the center of the SS slot, your camber gain will be reduced a bit more than the amount resulting from lowering that link by the 1/2" I mentioned earlier.
FYI, the 1/2" adjustment which I advise as a default setting was originally recommended by John Greenwood (see link below for this and much more). Unless actual testing proves a different setting better for a given situation, or unless you're at the drag strip where minimizing camber gain is definitely the correct call, IMCO 1/2" lower than stock (relative to the diff) is where the inner links should be located and left alone. To do so with the SS bracket, you'll need to either find or fab up additional lock plates which accomplish this. If having your own fabbed up isn't something you wish to tackle, let me know and I'll see if I can find a source.
edit - You might check to see if VBP is still manufacturing all SS brackets with the adjustment slots offset, front to back, or if they have one available with the slots lined up. The latter would serve better with the heims and locks.
Last edited by TheSkunkWorks; Jan 11, 2013 at 04:24 PM.
From: Graceland in a Not Correctly Restored Stingray
Originally Posted by briankeery
Do yourself a favour, and just get the heim-ended rods. They'll do exactly what you want - plus the SS are more expensive. Good luck.
Actually, after having purchased and studied a SS bracket, I decided to stick with the stock one myself. Other than the offset slots (which I assume are meant to lessen poly's tendancy to bind), the mounting holes are oversized and need bushed down...
Actually, after having purchased and studied a SS bracket, I decided to stick with the stock one myself. Other than the offset slots (which I assume are meant to lessen poly's tendancy to bind), the mounting holes are oversized and need bushed down...
FYI, the 1/2" adjustment which I advise as a default setting was originally recommended by John Greenwood (see link below for this and much more). Unless actual testing proves a different setting better for a given situation, or unless you're at the drag strip where minimizing camber gain is definitely the correct call, IMCO 1/2" lower than stock (relative to the diff) is where the inner links should be located and left alone. To do so with the SS bracket, you'll need to either find or fab up additional lock plates which accomplish this. If having your own fabbed up isn't something you wish to tackle, let me know and I'll see if I can find a source.
FYI there is a more clearly scanned version of the VIP article at VetteMod.com. You'll need to register to download it though. There is also a copy of "Corvette Handling - A Performance Workbook" by Herb Adams. Both are excellent reading if you have a serious interest in Vette suspension.
From: Graceland in a Not Correctly Restored Stingray
Originally Posted by Kid Vette
FYI there is a more clearly scanned version of the VIP article at VetteMod.com. You'll need to register to download it though. There is also a copy of "Corvette Handling - A Performance Workbook" by Herb Adams. Both are excellent reading if you have a serious interest in Vette suspension.
Thanks, I'll have to check that scan out. The one I've been referencing isn't all that great.
FWIW, while anything Herb Adams has to say on the subject of chassis engineering is worthy of note to anyone who wishes to become a student of the subject, his favoritism towards the big bars, soft springs (BBSS) school of thought by no means invalidates other setup philosophies.
Thanks, I'll have to check that scan out. The one I've been referencing isn't all that great.
FWIW, while anything Herb Adams has to say on the subject of chassis engineering is worthy of note to anyone who wishes to become a student of the subject, his favoritism towards the big bars, soft springs (BBSS) school of thought by no means invalidates other setup philosophies.
Yeah, Greenwood favored soft springs and big bars as well - but what do those guys know, right?
From: Graceland in a Not Correctly Restored Stingray
Originally Posted by Kid Vette
Yeah, Greenwood favored soft springs and big bars as well - but what do those guys know, right?
My point is, and remains, for those who may not know better, that there are other ways to go about sorting a chassis than to simply rely on huge bars to crutch up anti-roll stiffness. The application at hand ought best determine where upon the scale between minimal spring and minimal bar one should base their setup strategy, and rather than being a question of black or white that most often involves a lot of gray area. YMMV
.
Last edited by TheSkunkWorks; Jan 16, 2013 at 08:20 PM.