When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
those dish 17cc pistons are so low, like 7.8:1, might want to kick around buying 50cc heads. that would give ~9.95:1
or maybe 58cc heads.
those dart 64 are more like 67cc kind of unexciting.
those dish 17cc pistons are so low, like 7.8:1, might want to kick around buying 50cc heads. that would give ~9.95:1
or maybe 58cc heads.
those dart 64 are more like 67cc kind of unexciting.
I thought it was aviator but couldn't remember. I've heard on more than one occasion that the l48 was over rated on the compression. I've not done any math but couldn't he run .15" steel head gaskets and get the compression in the 9 to 1 range with 64cc heads.
Last edited by bluedawg; Jan 14, 2013 at 09:31 PM.
they come stock with .022 shim.
works out to 7.5:1
maybe could get 8.9 with 15shim and 64.
but more like 8.5 with the actual 67cc as measured by REE...
9.95:1 sounds real good with 50cc(except less than ideal squish, but it is good enough with .039). 50cc could go 10.4 with .015 shim, if they scare your pants off, go 58cc.
they come stock with .022 shim.
works out to 7.5:1
maybe could get 8.9 with 15shim and 64.
but more like 8.5 with the actual 67cc as measured by REE...
9.95:1 sounds real good with 50cc(except less than ideal squish, but it is good enough with .039). 50cc could go 10.4 with .015 shim, if they scare your pants off, go 58cc.
The stock head gasket was a .017" shim for my 77. You can get the Static compression up to 9.2:1 by shaving the heads down to a 61cc chamber. That leaves about .007 . on the head for future use. For me 9.2 SCR was not enough due to my altitude and soon as the temps rose above 70* or so the performance would suffer greatly since then the effective compression would fall below 8.5:1. If you are at sea level 9.2:1 might be good enough depending on cam selection.
Also those stock 76cc heads measured out to be 80cc's so real compression was more like 7.7:1 all told.
Last edited by REELAV8R; Jan 15, 2013 at 10:57 AM.
REE
send those heads back "not as advertised, not 64cc"
and buy 50cc heads.
The paperwork that came with the heads stated that the 64cc was a "nominal" measurement and to get true volume it would need to be measured. I called Dart and spoke to a rep who stated that the 67cc measurement I came up with was "within our specs for a cast head". And that if it had been a CNC'd head that it would be much closer to advertised volume. I have already shaved the heads so too late for me to return them in any case.
I guess 5% error is an acceptable spec for Dart. I understand that casting is not an exact method, but I would think tighter tolerances would be in order. You probably have to pay more $$ for better accuracy.
Live & Learn. That is why the op should look into smaller heads and call them and see the varience. i bet the 50cc are really 53cc
58's prolly 61 cc
My OPINION is they don't want pinging complaints, so they make them bigger, just like some pistons are .020 down in the hole.
Last motor i built, i had to send HALF the parts back!
The paperwork that came with the heads stated that the 64cc was a "nominal" measurement and to get true volume it would need to be measured. I called Dart and spoke to a rep who stated that the 67cc measurement I came up with was "within our specs for a cast head". And that if it had been a CNC'd head that it would be much closer to advertised volume. I have already shaved the heads so too late for me to return them in any case.
I guess 5% error is an acceptable spec for Dart. I understand that casting is not an exact method, but I would think tighter tolerances would be in order. You probably have to pay more $$ for better accuracy.
Send them back and go afrs. If you do mill them down, ive never tried it but have read that angle milling picks up in the neighbor hood of 15 cfm, you have to have eithermill the flange of the intakeor the face of the heads. Afr suggests angle milling and go even further to say that flat milling hurts flow.
Last edited by bluedawg; Jan 15, 2013 at 03:18 PM.
Live & Learn. That is why the op should look into smaller heads and call them and see the varience. the 50cc are really 53cc
58's prolly 61 cc
My OPINION is they don't want pinging complaints, so they make them bigger, just like some pistons are .020 down in the hole.
Last motor i built, i had to send HALF the parts back!
That sucks youd figure the manufacturer would atleast tell ya your buying a piece of crap low compression engine. What parts did you have to send back?
Live & Learn. That is why the op should look into smaller heads and call them and see the varience. i bet the 50cc are really 53cc
58's prolly 61 cc
My OPINION is they don't want pinging complaints, so they make them bigger, just like some pistons are .020 down in the hole.
Last motor i built, i had to send HALF the parts back!
Yep live and learn. It would be nice if what is advertised is what you would get. In the end I want to know exactly what it is that I have. This way once I get the engine together is something doesn't seem right at least I have eliminated some of the vairables that could be affecting my end result, and I can look to tuning or assembly error for a problem and not wonder about parts tolerances.
I plan on measuring everything and ccing the new pistons as well after I receive them.