When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I'm debating on taking out the rear leaf spring and installing the mono fiberglass leaf spring. Who has done this and are they happy with the choisce?
Thanks
Do a search, LOTS of satisfied people here with the mono spring. Some claimed improvements are better handling and smoother ride. I have one waiting to be put on.
I went with bilstein HDs and a #330 spring. Ive heard over and over again that its better to get a "softer" spring with tighter shocks.....we'll see how it behaves this spring.
I'm still on the fence about it. A little better ride would be nice and maybe eliminate some of the noises back there. I have to go look at the shocks i put in and see what i installed.
I have VBP's rear dual mount spring that was part of the Performance Plus suspension kit I bought. You can adjust the firmness of the spring. I have it set to the softest setting, all the way in, move the bolts out for a more firm setting. I run Bilstein Sport shocks also.
I spoke to Dick Guldstrand about this. Dick Guldstrand, who has raced more than I ever have was of the opinion that for his application the interleaf friction was desirable and steel was superior. He did have cars with both. I have only run steel springs (stock, F-41 and Daytona) so I can’t comment on a fiberglass spring.
I went with bilstein HDs and a #330 spring. Ive heard over and over again that its better to get a "softer" spring with tighter shocks.....we'll see how it behaves this spring.
I started with soft, but my car is lowered - which meant I was constantly on the bump stops
Hyperco 330 pound springs, longer bolts, and this is how it looked when I first got it down.
Fiberglass spring is thinner than the stock steel, so it comes with a spacer to allow you to attach it with the stock bolts. I was told by Eckler's that the spacer went in between the spring and the rear end cover. I think they were wrong.
From: Graceland in a Not Correctly Restored Stingray
Considering some of the spring rates and rear bar sizes I see here on the CF, IMCO this seems an appropriate place to mention for those who may have missed the fundamental fact that increasing rear anti-roll stiffness (whether by adding bar and/or a firmer spring) will necessarily shift balance towards, if not into, oversteer. So, do bear in mind that many a car with too much rear stiffness will seem to handle great right up until it bites you in the backside. My $.02
I spoke to Dick Guldstrand about this. Dick Guldstrand, who has raced more than I ever have was of the opinion that for his application the interleaf friction was desirable and steel was superior. He did have cars with both. I have only run steel springs (stock, F-41 and Daytona) so I can’t comment on a fiberglass spring.
Per a prior conversation with Dick's shop on the topic, he had experimented with several 'glass springs before deciding none satisfied him, which is why he doesn't even offer them for the C3. Steel F41 rear spring here, with narrowed main leaf from Guldstrand (and no rear bar).
Last edited by TheSkunkWorks; Jan 24, 2013 at 10:36 PM.
Everyone has their own opinion.
Here's mine.
The high rate composite springs are not a good idea. The spring rate is often 50% or more higher than stock. The arch on the spring is very much less than stock. So much less that, when adjusted to a nice ride height, the high rate (300 lb/in or more) composite spring does not even push the suspension to it's full downward travel. The wheels rattle loosely for an inch or so before the spring begins to engage the suspension. These stiff springs require very stiff shocks to control them. Many fellows like the Bilstein Sports for this type of application.
The Hyperco EZ Ride is a composite spring with a 180 to 200 lb/in rate. Almost identical to the standard "9 leaf" spring. It has enough arch so that the spring is actually doing something throughout the entire suspension travel, and can be controlled with a street type shock absorber (Monroe, Delco, etc. You can use the Bilstein HD's as well.). My vote is for the Hyperco EZ Ride.
Last edited by gcusmano74; Jan 25, 2013 at 11:38 PM.
The new composite springs suspension I installed handles way better than the stock suspension did. It takes turns like its on rails now. Stock suspension doesn't even come close to this one. The sacrifice is that the ride is more harsh. I've driven with both, so this is just my opinion.
I installed a VB&P 330 lb/in spring, along with Monroe Gas-Matic shocks on a '79 that my wife used to own. I did this around '94-'95. The change in ride quality was dramatic. It actually rode like a car, not a buckboard, and I had no issues whatsoever with ride height.