Rear leaf spring
1. As you can see in the picture below, I actually have always been satisfied with the ride height from day one and have never had an issues adjusting ride height-Maybe the springs today are different.
[IMG]
[/IMG]2. The rebound characteristic of a composite spring are very different from a steel spring especially considering the steel flexibility and the inserts between the leafs. From day one my 360 composite spring rode SOFTER than the oem 292 steel F-41 gymkhana spring. I don't think one can equate a steel spring rating with a composite spring rating. In order to equalize the 292 steel spring rate to a composite spring rating, I would and may go up to a 420lb spring, higher than my current 360 composite spring rate, since I would like a slightly stiffer ride.I currently have Bilstein Sports in the rear and Bilstein HD in the front with the 550 springs.
3. As I have noted various times in the past on the forum, the C3 is setup from the factory to understeer, even with the Gymkhana suspension. Stiffening the rear spring rate and or adding a rear bar will NOT create an oversteer monster, as long as the overall package is balanced. Stiffening the rear of a C3 will create a more neutral handling car which can oversteer at the limit for a novice driver but not necessarily a bad characteristic for a component driver.
4. My 78 has 550 front springs, poly control arms upper and lower, spreader bar in the front, 255/45/17 ZR tires, a 360 composite spring, 3/4 inch rear OEM type bar, Heim joint struts (no Bushings) etc and my C3 rides and handles better than it ever did as an OEM gymkhana suspended C3 in 1977 when it was built. A neighbor of mine with a Lexus LS 430 barge recently rode in my 78 and he could not believe how well the car rode-He always heard that C3's rode like trucks!!
Last edited by jb78L-82; Feb 11, 2013 at 03:47 PM.
Does this combo eliminate wheel hop with some power to the back?
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Here's mine.
The high rate composite springs are not a good idea. The spring rate is often 50% or more higher than stock. The arch on the spring is very much less than stock. So much less that, when adjusted to a nice ride height, the high rate (300 lb/in or more) composite spring does not even push the suspension to it's full downward travel. The wheels rattle loosely for an inch or so before the spring begins to engage the suspension. These stiff springs require very stiff shocks to control them. Many fellows like the Bilstein Sports for this type of application.
The Hyperco EZ Ride is a composite spring with a 180 to 200 lb/in rate. Almost identical to the standard "9 leaf" spring. It has enough arch so that the spring is actually doing something throughout the entire suspension travel, and can be controlled with a street type shock absorber (Monroe, Delco, etc. You can use the Bilstein HD's as well.). My vote is for the Hyperco EZ Ride.
Last edited by htown81vette; Feb 14, 2013 at 02:41 PM.






...anyway, as if it needed pointing out, not all backsides are calibrated the same; male, female or otherwise.
That said, there's a bit more to perceived ride quality than specific spring rates. If spring frequencies (front or rear) are too high, and/or improperly dampened, for wheel upsets commonly encountered on the surfaces one most often drives, the car in question will tend to ride harshly. Conversely, on smoother surfaces, higher spring frequencies can be used without such ill effect.
In any event, I say again, the effects on balance due to spring changes done for ride quality (or any other reason) should NOT be dismissed as a non-factor here.
Last edited by TheSkunkWorks; Feb 14, 2013 at 04:26 PM.











