When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Hello. My car is a 1974 that I put a 396 into. It has a Quadrajet 4MV (i think). Today it was running very strange, the secondaries would not open. When I got back and took a look at the carb I noticed that the item I am pointing to in the picture below had slid out of the bracket, the hose to the carb had fallen off, as did the attached rods and levers. I put everything back together and took it for another drive but every time I hit a bump that white round vacuum pod slips right out of the bracket again.
Please take a look at the photo. I think I have this back together correctly however the vacuum pod is still slipping out of its bracket. So I have two problems. One is that it won't stay in the bracket it slides into, and the secondaries wont open a full throttle. Like I said I'm really weak on carbs so please keep it simple if you can. I'm getting ready to do an intake manifold swap but I don't want begin until I have this running correctly again. Thanks in advance for any help.
Here is my theory. when the vacuum secondary can there gets a vacuum signal, it pulls that rod toward the front of the car and holds the secondaries shut. This is so they dont flop open at low speeds.
My theory is that when the can fell out of the retainer and was just hanging there, the weight of it hanging was holding the secondaries shut. Hence no secondaries while driving.
I would not hesitate to McGuyver that. First I would try to wrap some teflon tape around the vacuum can so that it would fit tighter. If that didnt hold I would get some type of glue. Probably trim adhesive or something that is safe on plastic.
My guess is if you get it to stay put, and it functions, your secondaries will work. If you are prepared to replace it, whats the harm in trying some superglue first? Worst thing is you could lose secondaries again.
Here is my theory. when the vacuum secondary can there gets a vacuum signal, it pulls that rod toward the front of the car and holds the secondaries shut. This is so they dont flop open at low speeds.
That's right. fix it and you will "hear" the secondaries...
From: At my Bar drinking and wrenching in Lafayette Colorado
The little "tangs" that hold and squeeze the choke pulloff in place are broken off, allowing the pulloff to fall out of the bracket. You can remove the pulloff from the bracket and take some vice grips to "squeeze" the bracket tighter - this will allow the pulloff to be pushed into the bracket with a press fit, and it won't fall out. Barring that, you can JB Weld it into the bracket or run a piece of safety wire around it to hold it in. Or, find a junk carb with a good bracket and replace the bracket.
Lars
Originally Posted by calwldlife
secondary lock out
napa should find it.
they ain't cheap
The secondary lockout is fine. No, NAPA does not carry Q-Jet Secondary Lockout levers. If it were needed (which it's not), most of us with used carbs sell the lockouts for about $10.
The secondary lockout is fine. No, NAPA does not carry Q-Jet Secondary Lockout levers. If it were needed (which it's not), most of us with used carbs sell the lockouts for about $10.
This pic shows the tabs referred to by Lars. This is a #7044206 1974 Q-Jet (L-48, Automatic) manufactured by Carter for GM. It seems to be a different configuration than the OP's version. But being a Q-Jet neophyte I do not know why.
From: At my Bar drinking and wrenching in Lafayette Colorado
Paul -
Good photo. Your carb is an actual '74 carb. The OP, although his car is a '74, has a '71 - '72-ish carb, which uses a different pulloff and a slotted secondary airvalve lever.
Paul -
Good photo. Your carb is an actual '74 carb. The OP, although his car is a '74, has a '71 - '72-ish carb, which uses a different pulloff and a slotted secondary airvalve lever.
I like the heat shield!
Lars
That's a speadbore heat shield from a 1970 300, 350, or 390. It is shaved a bit to clear the transmission-controlled spark (TCS) solenoid. That intake et al. has been sitting in my basement for three years; one of my projects that stalled. I could never figure out the TCS system and gave up. So now I have a few spare parts. The carb came from the fellow in Alberta.
I think it's really funny that you're paying any more than $16.28 on that part from NAPA. Really dumb if you do.
Lars
I don't have a 74.
never said I did.
Does the pull off lock out the secondaries?
Where did I post anything about the lever?
I admit to misnaming the picture.
Since you have a resell, sell me a pulloff for an 81 for ten bucks?
tell me how 3 years ago when I needed a PO that Napa did not quote me high 20's and tax made it 30 bucks. so I am a liar?
tell me why NOW it is 20 bucks plus tax.
laugh all you want. you are the one ASSUMING things.
I don't have a 74.
never said I did.
Does the pull off lock out the secondaries?
Where did I post anything about the lever?
I admit to misnaming the picture.
Since you have a resell, sell me a pulloff for an 81 for ten bucks?
tell me how 3 years ago when I needed a PO that Napa did not quote me high 20's and tax made it 30 bucks. so I am a liar?
tell me why NOW it is 20 bucks plus tax.
laugh all you want. you are the one ASSUMING things.
so when do I get the 81 pulloff for 10 bucks?
Wow! Cool down. Lars is very helpful and that kind of verbal abuse is not necessary.
Wow! Cool down. Lars is very helpful and that kind of verbal abuse is not necessary.
Agreed. Everyone in this thread is talking about a 74 carb. calwldlife brought up a price for a *completely* unrelated carb. Yes, they're both quadrajets but the pull-offs don't even mount the same between a 4MV and an E4ME... (and that's probably one of the more minor differences between the two)
Originally Posted by calwldlife
I don't have a 74.
never said I did.
Does the pull off lock out the secondaries?
Where did I post anything about the lever?
I admit to misnaming the picture.
Your "admission" is the answer to question 2. The choke pull-off does a lot more than just lock-out the secondaries. It actually acts as a dampener for the secondaries to prevent them from opening until vacuum has started to drop. Not to mention, they also pull the choke flap open, or "off" of the rear wall of the air horn. Hence "choke pull-off".
What makes your post MORE confusing is that the lever floating just underneath the choke, and above the secondary throttle blade pin, is a secondary lock-out.
The secondary lock-out lever is very visible in Paul's photo, riding on the pin in the secondary throttle shaft.
Last edited by Shark Racer; Apr 9, 2013 at 07:46 PM.
Wow! Cool down. Lars is very helpful and that kind of verbal abuse is not necessary.
he felt the need to school me, lecture as it were.
He as much called me a liar about a 30 dollar part.
other than misnaming the pulloff, my original post was good.
Available at napa and my experience was an expensive price.
he felt the need to school me, lecture as it were.
He as much called me a liar about a 30 dollar part.
other than misnaming the pulloff, my original post was good.
Available at napa and my experience was an expensive price.
Just fix and drive/enjoy your Corvette as I do. I hope you get things fixed soon.
Just fix and drive/enjoy your Corvette as I do. I hope you get things fixed soon.
it is fixed.
I will like having a spare for 10 bucks.
I took my original apart and fixed the leak in the diaphram.
still working good.
don't know how long though.
so anytime someone will beat the going rate, I will buy.