C3 Tech/Performance V8 Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Basic Tech and Maintenance for the C3 Corvette
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

borgeson steering vs steering rack kits

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 13, 2013 | 01:19 AM
  #21  
Gale Banks 80''s Avatar
Gale Banks 80'
Safety Car
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,723
Likes: 557
From: Seattle Washington
Default

Since the new Cars are going to Electric Power Steering, ( I'm not sure about the C7) Has anybody had any thoughts of going this route ?
Reply
Old May 13, 2013 | 01:28 AM
  #22  
RickyBerg's Avatar
RickyBerg
Pro
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 698
Likes: 8
From: Stockholm Sweden
Default

Originally Posted by v2racing
How can a reduced turning radius be dangerous?
I cant see the problem with a slightly reduced (increased) turning radius.

Just flip the trottle at the same time one let up the clutch and voila, one have a much tighter turning radius then any Volvo have ever had!

//Ricky.

Last edited by RickyBerg; May 13, 2013 at 01:36 AM.
Reply
Old May 13, 2013 | 01:35 AM
  #23  
RickyBerg's Avatar
RickyBerg
Pro
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 698
Likes: 8
From: Stockholm Sweden
Default

Originally Posted by TNX ZORA
When the rack systems first came out they created a significantly greater turning radius which can potentially be dangerous. Has this problem been fixed?
Originally Posted by TNX ZORA
When your turning radius is shortened enough such that you can't make a u-turn on a four lane road, let's say at a major intersection, it can be very dangerous.
I have had my Steeroids for a couple of years now and i can assure you that this hypotetic problem of yours is absolutely non existing.

Yes the turning radius IS slightly increased but if you cant do a u-turn on an 4 lane road there must be something wrong with your setup..

What R&P unit are you reffering to?

//Ricky.

Last edited by RickyBerg; May 13, 2013 at 05:56 AM.
Reply
Old May 13, 2013 | 05:55 AM
  #24  
worship79's Avatar
worship79
Drifting
Supporting Member
Conversation Starter
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,623
Likes: 29
From: The Netherlands
Default

Originally Posted by Gale Banks 80'
Since the new Cars are going to Electric Power Steering, ( I'm not sure about the C7) Has anybody had any thoughts of going this route ?
Yep; there's a companay selling units for C1/C2 corvettes, but their unit is expensive.

Looking into using a GM europe (Opel/Vauxhall) electric PS unit, which are plentifull here. Issues:
- Fitting it under the dash,
- Signal to the speedcontrol box (either simulated or actual signal).
Reply
Old May 13, 2013 | 11:07 AM
  #25  
TNX ZORA's Avatar
TNX ZORA
Racer
15 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 491
Likes: 5
From: Tampa Bay Area, U.S.A. (Zombie Nation)
Default

Originally Posted by RickyBerg
I have had my Steeroids for a couple of years now and i can assure you that this hypotetic problem of yours is absolutely non existing.

Yes the turning radius IS slightly increased but if you cant do a u-turn on an 4 lane road there must be something wrong with your setup..

What R&P unit are you reffering to?

//Ricky.

Did some search on "hypotetic" and it seems to be a newly invented version of "hypothetical" that is not yet in the English dictionary. Thanks for verifying that your R&P installation has increased your minimum turning radius. It was the Steeroids conversion that I had at one time considered. I admit to being **** about certain safety related mods. I'll never spend time and money to increase my minimum turning radius even one inch. That one inch could lead to ruining my right front rim or getting rear ended. Unless you possess remote viewing skills you can't possibly know what I am sometimes confronted with. While my concerns may be nearly mine alone they are not hypothetical. I'm glad for you that in your area the Steeroids conversion has been a net-plus, win-win situation.
Reply
Old May 13, 2013 | 11:25 AM
  #26  
RickyBerg's Avatar
RickyBerg
Pro
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 698
Likes: 8
From: Stockholm Sweden
Default

Originally Posted by TNX ZORA
Did some search on "hypotetic" and it seems to be a newly invented version of "hypothetical" that is not yet in the English dictionary. Thanks for verifying that your R&P installation has increased your minimum turning radius. It was the Steeroids conversion that I had at one time considered. I admit to being **** about certain safety related mods. I'll never spend time and money to increase my minimum turning radius even one inch. That one inch could lead to ruining my right front rim or getting rear ended. Unless you possess remote viewing skills you can't possibly know what I am sometimes confronted with. While my concerns may be nearly mine alone they are not hypothetical. I'm glad for you that in your area the Steeroids conversion has been a net-plus, win-win situation.
Haha, I am sorry for struggling a bit with the spelling. I have to excuse myself for been born in the land of "Far-far away".

Well for me it was a win-win, because I am not really bothered with the very little increase in turning radius compared to the other positive sides of the installation.

Well.. No, I cant possibly know what YOU are confronted with so therefore I don't bother speculate about that.

Thanks for the English lesson.
Reply
Old May 13, 2013 | 11:44 AM
  #27  
my 76 ray's Avatar
my 76 ray
Melting Slicks
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,520
Likes: 11
From: Hinckley OH
Default

I can't speak about the Borgeson but I have a '76 with the stock steering in good shape and a '74 with a Rack Attack conversion. Both are power steering. They both track straight and true and I really have to look for differences. The turning radius might be a little bigger with the Rack Attack but I really have to look for it to notice it. Both cars go exactly where I point them on the highway. I'm not correcting for wandering in either car. If I look for it, yes there is a little play in the stock steering but I really have to look for it. There might be a inch in either direction when going in a straight line but nothing you would really notice in normal driving. I have autocrossed the '76 and the car went exactly where I wanted. I will autocross the '74 in a couple weeks so I'll see how that handles.

My opinion is that if you are complaining about loose steering in a C3, then you have worn components somewhere.

Last edited by my 76 ray; May 13, 2013 at 11:48 AM.
Reply
Old May 13, 2013 | 12:46 PM
  #28  
jb78L-82's Avatar
jb78L-82
Le Mans Master
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,456
Likes: 977
From: RI, Now Franklin/Nashville TN
Default

Originally Posted by my 76 ray
I can't speak about the Borgeson but I have a '76 with the stock steering in good shape and a '74 with a Rack Attack conversion. Both are power steering. They both track straight and true and I really have to look for differences. The turning radius might be a little bigger with the Rack Attack but I really have to look for it to notice it. Both cars go exactly where I point them on the highway. I'm not correcting for wandering in either car. If I look for it, yes there is a little play in the stock steering but I really have to look for it. There might be a inch in either direction when going in a straight line but nothing you would really notice in normal driving. I have autocrossed the '76 and the car went exactly where I wanted. I will autocross the '74 in a couple weeks so I'll see how that handles.

My opinion is that if you are complaining about loose steering in a C3, then you have worn components somewhere.
Interesting comments about the stock steering versus R&P steering on a C3. My 78 has a blueprinted/rebuilt OEM steering box by GTR1999 aka Gary Ramadei using the OEM gears, a custom olite shaft bushing, and hand adjusted for feel and play. Besides the rebuilt OEM steering box everything else in the system is the original piece-never replaced,no leaking-The steering is dead on with ZERO play. My other 5 cars have R&P and the 78 is real close in terms of steering response. R&P steering seems to have quicker steering ratio and so does the Borgeson box along with better "feel". I just replaced my 94 Mustang GT Convertible R&P steering rack (leaking) with a 2003 Mustang Cobra rack this past weekend-slightly better feel and quicker ratio but basically the same. I always wonder what the OEM steering box would feel like if it had the quicker steering ratio like the Borgeson?
Reply
Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer

 Brett Foote
story-2

10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-4

10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

 Verdad Gallardo
Old May 13, 2013 | 01:57 PM
  #29  
v2racing's Avatar
v2racing
Melting Slicks
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,666
Likes: 289
From: Spring Park MN
Default

I've driven a lot of these cars over the decades and there can be quite a difference in handling from car to car. The 80 F41 optioned I had was a low mile car that had never been messed with. It was one of the tightest stock C2/C3 cars I have driven. It tracked very well and even did real well on the autocross track with 255/60/15 tires after I did some alignment changes.

Now my 75 Vert is another story. It had 75,000 on it and the PO had some shop do their "Stage II" suspension job on it. They put in new 550# front springs and a 360 glass on the back with big sway bars front and rear. Tubular nut lock tie rods were installed and heim joint strut rods in back. The problem is they left the worn out tie rod ends, idler, steering box, ball joints and trailing arm bushings. It was a mess. You didn't know where this car was going to go while driving.

So for obvious reasons I pulled all the suspension and steering front and back off this car. I did a lot of changes and upgrades. I chose to put the Steeroids on just because I liked the fact you could adjust bump steer and I know how they feel on late model cars. It is lighter too which I like. All the joints between the steering column and the rack is a little funky, but if you spend the time to get it all aligned properly, they steer very smoothly and you can't tell they are there. I already weighed in on the larger turning radius. The mounting brackets look a little light weight, but the are properly gusseted so that they are fairly stiff. I tied flexing them after mounting and before I put the rack on. If I decide they aren't stiff enough when I get back on the road, I will fix that.

My point? The stock steering when tight works very well. I haven't tried the Borgeson, but I'm sure it is nice if the rest of the car is right and people seem to like them. Many people love their racks to though. Any of these steering choices done right (I stress right!) with a properly set up car will work and make the cars enjoyable to drive.
Reply
Old May 13, 2013 | 02:25 PM
  #30  
Belgian1979vette's Avatar
Belgian1979vette
Thread Starter
Melting Slicks
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,164
Likes: 7
From: Beringen
Default

Originally Posted by aussiejohn
Belgian,

The "returnability" of a steering system has a lot to do with the caster angle. Corvettes have an angle of about one degree, which was fine for the cross ply tyres that were available at the time. Modern cars that use radial tyres almost exclusively use a greater caster angle, somewhere from four to seven degrees in most cases.

Milling the holes in your upper A arm "cross rod" (can't think of the proper term) will allow you to position the upper A arm further to the rear and this will increase your caster angle. Check up on this from someone who has experience in this area.

I have a Borgeson in my '74 coupe and it drives like a new car. I can highly recommend it.

Regards from Down Under.

aussiejohn
Hi John

I have the VBP offset A-arms. Currently 5 1/2° of caster. Should be plenty.

As for the box : it has been rebuilt. I put in a new pitman and sector that was available at the time from Corvette South. Maybe that's the issue. Don't know. Seems to have a really bad or difficult to find center.

Last edited by Belgian1979vette; May 13, 2013 at 02:30 PM.
Reply
Old May 13, 2013 | 02:42 PM
  #31  
v2racing's Avatar
v2racing
Melting Slicks
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,666
Likes: 289
From: Spring Park MN
Default

Originally Posted by Belgian1979vette
Hi John

I have the VBP offset A-arms. Currently 5 1/2° of caster. Should be plenty.

As for the box : it has been rebuilt. I put in a new pitman and sector that was available at the time from Corvette South. Maybe that's the issue. Don't know. Seems to have a really bad or difficult to find center.
If this is adjusted too tight you will have the problem you are writing about. Too loose and you have slop at the steering wheel.

Reply
Old May 13, 2013 | 10:12 PM
  #32  
chevymans 77's Avatar
chevymans 77
Melting Slicks
Supporting Gold
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,717
Likes: 121
From: Sulphur LA
St. Jude Donor '05-'06,'11,'13-'14,'16,'18,'19,'24, '25
Default

Originally Posted by Belgian1979vette
Hi John

I have the VBP offset A-arms. Currently 5 1/2° of caster. Should be plenty.

As for the box : it has been rebuilt. I put in a new pitman and sector that was available at the time from Corvette South. Maybe that's the issue. Don't know. Seems to have a really bad or difficult to find center.
If you have the VBP offset tub A-arms your steering radius is reduced way more then the rack will reduce it.

I have them also,

Neal
Reply
Old May 17, 2013 | 09:53 AM
  #33  
sajclayton's Avatar
sajclayton
8th Gear
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Default Borgenson on my 74.

I have replaced the stock steering with the Borgenson unit on my 74. I have had no problems with it even with the Hooker side mount headers. Drives like a dream
Reply
Old May 18, 2013 | 02:18 PM
  #34  
Tommys75's Avatar
Tommys75
Heel & Toe
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
From: Sweetwater TX
Default

I am doing an LSX swap in my 75. Has anyone done a R&P kit on a LSX set up car and how well does it clear the Oil pan.
Reply
Old May 18, 2013 | 03:33 PM
  #35  
Belgian1979vette's Avatar
Belgian1979vette
Thread Starter
Melting Slicks
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,164
Likes: 7
From: Beringen
Default

I still had to do a final alignment after the car was complete again and with a full tank of gas and just did that today.

I tackled the steering a little bit different. I put the flat in the 12 o'clock position as suggested by Jim Shea and then set the toe in on the car. A lot better now, but its a little loose around center. I already adjusted it quite a lot. I think adjusting it more will only serve to decrease the steering wheel returnability.

Don't know but the price of a rack setup is quite high. I rather spend that money on a 5-speed.
Reply
Old May 19, 2013 | 08:11 AM
  #36  
donnie1956's Avatar
donnie1956
Burning Brakes
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,192
Likes: 7
From: Wentzville MO
Default

Originally Posted by Tommys75
I am doing an LSX swap in my 75. Has anyone done a R&P kit on a LSX set up car and how well does it clear the Oil pan.
Not sure what oil pan you are planning on using as I used a batwing off of a C5. Jeep box had plenty of clearance between exhaust manifold.

Here is the jeep box in my swap.
Plenty of room.
Reply
Old May 19, 2013 | 01:56 PM
  #37  
Tommys75's Avatar
Tommys75
Heel & Toe
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
From: Sweetwater TX
Default

I currently have a truck Pan on but think I am going to change it due to ground clearence. I keep seeing stuff about the jeep steering box. What is the advantage to it?
Thanks
Reply

Get notified of new replies

To borgeson steering vs steering rack kits

Old May 19, 2013 | 02:58 PM
  #38  
donnie1956's Avatar
donnie1956
Burning Brakes
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,192
Likes: 7
From: Wentzville MO
Default

Originally Posted by Tommys75
I currently have a truck Pan on but think I am going to change it due to ground clearence. I keep seeing stuff about the jeep steering box. What is the advantage to it?
Thanks
I went with Jeep because my old system leaked just as much after I repaired as before. Swapped out and eliminated the cylinder and 2 of the hoses. Closure steering ratio. You better go with a batwing oil pan or you won't have much if any ground clearance. Couple for sale on LS forum.
Reply
Old May 19, 2013 | 07:16 PM
  #39  
Tommys75's Avatar
Tommys75
Heel & Toe
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
From: Sweetwater TX
Default

Is there a thread on this modification? I want to do it but need more info.
Reply
Old May 19, 2013 | 07:40 PM
  #40  
donnie1956's Avatar
donnie1956
Burning Brakes
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,192
Likes: 7
From: Wentzville MO
Default

Originally Posted by Tommys75
Is there a thread on this modification? I want to do it but need more info.
Borgeson is a drop in everything complete kit. I like to scrounge and modify so I went the salvage yard route.

http://www.vettemod.com/forum/showth...highlight=jeep
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:17 PM.

story-0
10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Corvettes that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 10:34:17


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer

A lot of money has changed hands at the online auction house over the years.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-03 10:21:50


VIEW MORE
story-2
10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: 10 great gifts Corvette enthusiasts actually want for Father's Day!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:40


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

Slideshow: These are the quirks, annoyances, and oddly lovable problems that every Corvette owner eventually learns to live with.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-28 09:31:39


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

Slideshow: 10 reasons why the C6 Z06 is still a performance benchmark after 20 years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 17:20:09


VIEW MORE
story-5
How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

Slideshow: How much horsepower every Corvette engine lost in 1972.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:54:53


VIEW MORE
story-6
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

Slideshow: How to Protect A Convertible Top: 10 DOs & DON'Ts

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-03 00:00:00


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

Slideshow: The 10 most explosive Corvettes ever built based on power-to-weight ratio.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-20 07:23:03


VIEW MORE
story-8
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

Slideshow: From C1 to C8 we compare every Corvette generation by the numbers.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 16:54:12


VIEW MORE
story-9
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

Slideshow: Some Corvette pace cars became collectible legends, while others perfectly captured the look and attitude of their era.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-11 09:50:51


VIEW MORE