When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
almost no (99.8%) stock C3 will come close to "an honest" 160. nor very many modded ones.
speed in gears is purely a function of rpms, rear tire height, transmission gear ratio and rear axle ratio. until overcoming wind resistance factors in, in which case then hp matters, as it takes a certain amount of rwhp to over come wind resistance, so even with the right tranny and rear end and tires, one still isn't going to hit 160 without about 300 rwhp anyway..
there's one quote above in this thread, re accelerating another 10 seconds after hitting 85, and being at something like 120 or 130. for the most part, ain't the way it works... look at the 0 - 100 times for many cars listed in the archives of the road tests of various C3's, especially as compared to the quarter mile trap speeds..
"So how do you get a pic doing 100 MPH with no hands on the wheel???"
Left hand on wheel right hand holds digital camera under the chin to snap a picture. Take a few as you never know if they are going to come out or not.
Gone around 120 a few times but that scares me some :sad: . However I normally have it over 100 each time I drive it.
The reason I'm over 100 is because in 1st rev it past 6000 rpm (55 mph), then 2nd past 6000 rpm (91 mph) and stay on it a little in 3rd. It truley is a rush. :yesnod:
I passed this ricer doing about 90, and (typical) they pulled into the fastlane and got on my butt. I put it to the floor and a few seconds after he had shrunk to a pinpoint in the rear-view I glanced at the speedo, and it said 135. Dunno if my speedo is 100 percent calibrated, but I do know there is one very disappointed Acura owner out there. When I slowed back down to 90, and grabbed the second lane, he eventually caught up. I just grinned, let him know he was .. umm.. number 1, and took my exit. :blueangel:
EASILY,on a recent club day at an airfield we were doing runs from a standing start with speed measured by police radar at about the 800 meter mark......my 74R with new 383,700R4 and 3.08 was doing 4500rpm and 219kph(136mph) in third and still accelerating hard,i was more concerned with stopping....Because the engine was still breaking in i was changing at 4500rpm......I found what has been said about lifting at speed to be rubbish......the rear was squatting under power and airflow over the hood was sqautting the front down making the steering heavier, not lighter...I'm no engineer but surely the laminar flow over a surface as large as the hood area would force it down rather than up.....before the flames start i know aircraft wings work the opposite way.....as i said,no engineer, but i can interpret what was happening ok........john :chevy oops,just been reminded that my maths is lousy,it must have been in top gear,ie .7 overdrive......see neither an engineer nor a mathematician..john
I was over Steve Straus to get the baddest hood in the land and I gotta tell ya... if anyone is going to push the mark anytime soon.... it will be him and his AMAZING :eek: 427. Holy SCHITTT is that motor bad butt. I think his motor is bigger than most Honda... CARS. :eek: :crazy:
Once I go over 110 my steering is so light it scares the hell out of me. c :eek: and the engine has much more power in reserve but I'm too afraid of losing control of the steering. Just a little input at the wheel before I know it I'm 2 lanes over....so I'll never know what the Vette can do, not worth getting myself killed over this.
This is not how the car was intended to feel or behave at such modest speeds. Something is wrong and should be fixed! Once it is, you will be rewarded with a vastly improved driving experience, even at legal speeds.
I agree with chuck,there is something badly wrong with your suspension/alignment if that is happening.......i have adjustable Konis with new springs and it tracks like a train......i have rebuilt the steering box,new rag joint,no power steering and all new linkages all properly aligned....the faster i went the heavier the steering was indicating that the suspension was loading up........john :chevy
Once I go over 110 my steering is so light it scares the hell out of me. c :eek: and the engine has much more power in reserve but I'm too afraid of losing control of the steering. Just a little input at the wheel before I know it I'm 2 lanes over....so I'll never know what the Vette can do, not worth getting myself killed over this.
I have owned 5 Corvettes, from a low of 14K miles to a high of 98k miles, and every one of them felt the same. After 110 -120 MPH the cars get very light in the front end. Even Zora stated on many occasions that Bill Mitchells front end design was flawed and created lift instead of downforce over 100 MPH in stock form. What pops the headlights open is a combination of air flow over the top and pressure build up from the bottom causing lift.
All of the race cars metioned above had the nose lowered and some type of spoiler to overcome the lift created by the C3 nose design.
In 1978 Jim Rathmann tested the 78 Corvette to pace the Indy 500 and said the car was unstable at extended speeds over 100MPH. (The pace speed was raised that year from 100MPH to 120MPH). That is the reason Chevrolet added the Pace Car spoilers and the car became the first car ever to pace the 500 without any body, engine or suspension mods. (except tires which were shaved)
I have owned and driven a lot of race cars and know what to results of a light front end can be, I wouldn't drive a C3 at extened high speed without some mods like gkull's.
We are going to have to agree to disagree. I have over 200,000 miles in C3's, over 100,000 miles in C4's, and only 10,000 miles in ZO6's. I couldn't disagree more!
Chuck
Bill Mitchell's design was the racing Sting Ray, the predecessor to the C2 which did have a lifting problem. The C3 was designed by Larry Shinada (sp?). Rathman's comments were likely made regarding the car with the tops off, which is how the pace car was driven much of the time at INDY. The fast back glass trapped a lot of air if driven fast with the tops off. My '85 could only do about 120-125 with the top off, 155 with it on. I never drove my '79 that fast with the tops off, but I would expect it would make a lot of difference too.
Both C2 & C3 were run OVER 160 mph. Chassis refinement was carried out at 100 mph. Some need to upgrade sus. to FE-7 & get alaigned. Pace car ft. spoiler rec. for 68-77. OVER 160 mph is not a problem properly set up w/ enough power.
Been to 158. Speedo is not working- used my GPS and the tach. Calculating from RPM's agreed with the GPS. This is with 4.11's. oh yeah...and overdrive! :)