When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
The AFR heads are probably 25-40HP more than most other offerings not cheap but you'll get what you pay for.....free HP!
Not "free" but a 25 HP average increase across the entire operating range for a few hundred extra is the cheapest power you will buy, especially if it is cammed to take advantage of their capabilities. This is power that does not cost streetability.
As far as intake I have a jegs Dual plane vortec intake , it clears all holley and my new fast efi on the 80 i own.
Anyone seen the ZZ465 ... 350ci .. 465 horse .. 650 holley rpm air gap .. 575/595 cam .. Now come on ya have to admit that is un-herd of power off a 350 ci motor .. And it uses the fast burn head and is sold as a full dress motor ..
Best part of all is to get 600-650 lift on the fast burns cost 199.00 for the nitrated PAC beehive springs no machine work needed
do you have flat top pistons? If you do your compression is more like 10.7
My 383 had detonation problems with my first roller cam
I had a roller cam like the XR282hr only the solid roller version. I moved up to a something like a XR286HR to cure the detonation problem with my 64 cc heads. I actually just put my smallest heads on that 383 AFR 210's
I had a roller cam like the XR282hr only the solid roller version. I moved up to a something like a XR282HR to cure the detonation problem with my 64 cc heads. I actually just put my smallest heads on that 383 AFR 210's
If he would have gone with the XR264HR with 10 to 1 compression and Sportsman II iron heads he would detonate the pistons out the side of the block. The XR276HR will be OK with his compression with aluminum heads. If he could nail down exact measurables like gasket, deck height, Piston volume ect and a for sure head choice it would be best to figure exact compression and come up with a even better cam match for the build. AFR with free flowing exhaust would likely be better off with a single pattern with more lift. I like this one with 1.6 rockers if 10 to 1 is right. http://www.summitracing.com/parts/hr...make/chevrolet
This is where AFR excels. Their 180 eliminator flows more than most 200+ cc Heads on the market. Port velocity helps bottom end torque. I/E ratio is another strong point as well as lightweight valvetrain components. If budget is not the primary driver buy AFR. If budget has no bearing at all buy the AFR Competition ported 195 eliminators for about $2000. They flow 300CFM and are capable of close to 600 HP with a 195 port. If budget is the primary driver look at the Straub heads. They seem to be the best bang for the buck in a budget aluminum head.
A little info on I/E ratio. Don't let it enter in to the equation. It's like rod ratio, it is what it ends up being. If 2 heads are equal int intake flow but one has less exhaust flow that just means it will have an exhaust lobe that holds the valve open longer.
If you look at some forms of racing, mainley professional ranks, they don't care about exhaust flow numbers. They know they can cam it to make the power.
A little info on I/E ratio. Don't let it enter in to the equation. It's like rod ratio, it is what it ends up being. If 2 heads are equal int intake flow but one has less exhaust flow that just means it will have an exhaust lobe that holds the valve open longer.
If you look at some forms of racing, mainley professional ranks, they don't care about exhaust flow numbers. They know they can cam it to make the power.
I understand that but better exhaust flow on the head allows you to use a shorter duration on the exhaust, reducing overlap and reversion, improving street manners, vacuum, off idle throttle response and idle quality all pluses in a street engine specifically with less than optimal gearing and street exhaust. Makes more difference in a typical street application vs all out high RPM launch, WOT to redline seen in drag racing or the upper midrange to redline narrow powerband seen in road courses and circle track. I have a similar opinion on LSA. In many street applications I would give up peak power numbers for increased width in the powerband, flatter, less peaky torque curve, street manners, idle quality, vacuum and MPG. JMHO.
I understand that but better exhaust flow on the head allows you to use a shorter duration on the exhaust, reducing overlap and reversion, improving street manners, vacuum, off idle throttle response and idle quality all pluses in a street engine specifically with less than optimal gearing and street exhaust. Makes more difference in a typical street application vs all out high RPM launch, WOT to redline seen in drag racing or the upper midrange to redline narrow powerband seen in road courses and circle track. I have a similar opinion on LSA. In many street applications I would give up peak power numbers for increased width in the powerband, flatter, less peaky torque curve, street manners, idle quality, vacuum and MPG. JMHO.
I have to do vacuum rule stuff all the time. BB Fords are a prime example of poor I/E ratio. I have a class that they have to pull 12" of vacuum at 1000 rpm One of the cams is 240/260 @ .050 on a sep of 109. She pulls 15".
If you put the event's where they need to be then you can end up with decent idle and vacuum.