C3 Tech/Performance V8 Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Basic Tech and Maintenance for the C3 Corvette
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Why people remove smog pump?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 1, 2014 | 08:49 AM
  #21  
bashcraft's Avatar
bashcraft
Le Mans Master
20 Year Member
Active Streak: 30 Days
Active Streak: 60 Days
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,506
Likes: 139
From: Butler Pa
Default

Originally Posted by Super6
The A.I.R. system relied on low performance engine timing (4 degrees BTDC initial on an L-71) and resultant incomplete combustion in the cylinder to effect the re-burn of combustion products in the exhaust system, thereby lowering the overall emissions at the expense of performance. By running the timing at a more performance oriented 12-16 degrees like is recommended today, you won't be doing much re-burning in the exhaust and the air pump wouldn't be serving much of a purpose. At the higher initial timing, the engine is going to run more efficiently and definitely feel more powerful.
So, if I'm reading this correctly, you're saying that GM deliberately screwed up the tune on acceptably efficient engines so that an A.I.R. pump could clean up the resultant incomplete combustion by-products?
Reply
Old May 1, 2014 | 09:13 AM
  #22  
jb78L-82's Avatar
jb78L-82
Le Mans Master
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,455
Likes: 977
From: RI, Now Franklin/Nashville TN
Default

Originally Posted by gdh
I don't have an air pump on my '72. A Min of Environment officer pulled me over and did a spot check and he pulled the hoses off the vac cannister. Didn't have that raw gas smell before this but the drive home was awful. Put the hoses back on the next day and no more raw gas stench.
Not really sure where you are going with this example but I have not had the charcoal canister hooked up in my car for 30 years and have no raw gas smell!
Reply
Old May 1, 2014 | 09:18 AM
  #23  
jb78L-82's Avatar
jb78L-82
Le Mans Master
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,455
Likes: 977
From: RI, Now Franklin/Nashville TN
Default

Originally Posted by bashcraft
So, if I'm reading this correctly, you're saying that GM deliberately screwed up the tune on acceptably efficient engines so that an A.I.R. pump could clean up the resultant incomplete combustion by-products?
GM's tuning of these engines back in the 70's was based on very primitive knowledge of the whole emissions issue and is a well known issue to start with. Since emissions back then was based almost entirely on passing an idle test, not running, the engines were detuned to meet the IDLE standard, not running at RPM's above that threshold which resulted in setting the engines timing and carb to meet those standards which adversely effected running efficiency.
Reply
Old May 1, 2014 | 06:39 PM
  #24  
Super6's Avatar
Super6
Burning Brakes
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 925
Likes: 7
Default

Originally Posted by bashcraft
So, if I'm reading this correctly, you're saying that GM deliberately screwed up the tune on acceptably efficient engines so that an A.I.R. pump could clean up the resultant incomplete combustion by-products?
Yes, you are reading that right. Read the Duke Williams corollary paper to Lar's Distributor Vacuum Advance paper. The low initial advance number and ported vacuum were used together for emissions control. I'm no expert, but I'm aware of the fact that you don't want 4 degrees BTDC and port vacuum for performance or a smoother cooler-running idle.

If you're running no vacuum advance or ported advance, plug the vacuum can hose into a hand vacuum pump, give the pump a few squeezes and you'll hear the tone of the engine change as the rpm comes up and the idle smoothes out.
Reply
Old May 1, 2014 | 06:51 PM
  #25  
7t9l82's Avatar
7t9l82
Le Mans Master
15 Year Member
Conversation Starter
Photogenic
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 6,938
Likes: 848
From: melbourne florida
2023 C3 of the Year Finalist - Modified
Default

actually , government bureaucrats decided what the auto industry must due to reduce emissions. i am sure the automakers engineers were thrilled by it. thats sarcasm. the beginning of the government thinking they were experts on something they knew absolutely nothing about. i understand the president now wants the states to put tolls on interstate highways ( and return part to the feds) to pay for road repairs that are supposed to be paid from the tax on fuels that have been directed elsewhere. it may help to study who you vote for
Reply
Old May 2, 2014 | 12:27 PM
  #26  
TWINRAY's Avatar
TWINRAY
Melting Slicks
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,683
Likes: 34
From: Working on the car NY
Default

First thing you did back in the early 70's was take it off and plug the manifold holes
Reply
Old May 2, 2014 | 01:20 PM
  #27  
Super6's Avatar
Super6
Burning Brakes
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 925
Likes: 7
Default

Originally Posted by TWINRAY
First thing you did back in the early 70's was take it off and plug the manifold holes
If doing this now, pulling the extension tubes out of the exhaust manifolds would help the exhaust flow too.
Reply
Old May 2, 2014 | 01:27 PM
  #28  
Ontario73's Avatar
Ontario73
Pro
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 535
Likes: 8
From: London Ontario
Default

Originally Posted by gdh
I don't have an air pump on my '72. A Min of Environment officer pulled me over and did a spot check and he pulled the hoses off the vac cannister. Didn't have that raw gas smell before this but the drive home was awful. Put the hoses back on the next day and no more raw gas stench.
Out of curiosity what was the outcome of said MOE inspection without the air pump? I have mine in a box due to running headers, but, have all other equipment intact.

Tim
Reply
Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer

 Brett Foote
story-2

10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-4

10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

 Verdad Gallardo
Old May 2, 2014 | 01:30 PM
  #29  
cwwhk's Avatar
cwwhk
Thread Starter
Instructor
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 128
Likes: 3
Default

Many thanks to everyone's input. The consensus so far seems to be the following:

Takes little hp to drive the pump.
System create clutter in engine bay.
Not very effective at reducing emissions.
Idle performance is poor if OEM ignition timing is adhered to.

Given the above, I will just drive my car a few times and enjoy the A.I.R. free engine for now. Then later in the year I will put back the OEM A.I.R. system before it gets lost amongst all my other car stuff. I will then mitigate the performance penalty by playing with manifold vs port vacuum as well as more advanced ignition timing at idle.

Oh and I'm perfectly OK with -30hp by having the extension tubes into the exhaust manifold.

Regards,
Wayne

Last edited by cwwhk; May 2, 2014 at 01:33 PM.
Reply
Old May 2, 2014 | 02:03 PM
  #30  
69427's Avatar
69427
Tech Contributor
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,910
Likes: 962
From: I tend to be leery of any guy who doesn't own a chainsaw or a handgun.
Default

Originally Posted by bashcraft
So, if I'm reading this correctly, you're saying that GM deliberately screwed up the tune on acceptably efficient engines so that an A.I.R. pump could clean up the resultant incomplete combustion by-products?
It's not incomplete combustion (there wasn't a bunch of fuel and oxygen just going along for the ride). Engines back then were always adjusted a bit on the rich side for drivability, so there was always insufficient oxygen in the A/F mix to burn all the fuel (regardless of timing). The AIR system was there to convert exhaust CO into CO2. For the air (oxygen) injection system to work efficiently the exhaust gas had to be damn hot (chemical reactions occur more readily at higher temperatures). By retarding the timing the exhaust exiting the cylinder is hotter than it would be if the timing was advanced properly (for economy and performance). (The retarded timing also lowered combustion temperature/pressure which also lowered NOx emissions.) When the injected air met the hot CO it converted the CO into CO2, harmless compared to CO.

Makes perfect sense in the chemistry world. With the government mandating the emission numbers, what other choice did the automakers have (other than stop producing the IC engine) than to alter the engine's timing (they didn't "screw it up"!)?
Reply
Old May 2, 2014 | 07:54 PM
  #31  
LS4 PILOT's Avatar
LS4 PILOT
Melting Slicks
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,091
Likes: 40
Default

Originally Posted by gdh
I don't have an air pump on my '72. A Min of Environment officer pulled me over and did a spot check and he pulled the hoses off the vac cannister. Didn't have that raw gas smell before this but the drive home was awful. Put the hoses back on the next day and no more raw gas stench.
A what pulled you over ...where ? :eek

Dude ... The pollution ***** ....after you .....too funny . ...
Reply
Old May 2, 2014 | 10:25 PM
  #32  
jcuprisi's Avatar
jcuprisi
Advanced
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
From: Mill Hall PA
Default


Originally Posted by 69427
It's not incomplete combustion (there wasn't a bunch of fuel and oxygen just going along for the ride). Engines back then were always adjusted a bit on the rich side for drivability, so there was always insufficient oxygen in the A/F mix to burn all the fuel (regardless of timing). The AIR system was there to convert exhaust CO into CO2. For the air (oxygen) injection system to work efficiently the exhaust gas had to be damn hot (chemical reactions occur more readily at higher temperatures). By retarding the timing the exhaust exiting the cylinder is hotter than it would be if the timing was advanced properly (for economy and performance). (The retarded timing also lowered combustion temperature/pressure which also lowered NOx emissions.) When the injected air met the hot CO it converted the CO into CO2, harmless compared to CO.

Makes perfect sense in the chemistry world. With the government mandating the emission numbers, what other choice did the automakers have (other than stop producing the IC engine) than to alter the engine's timing (they didn't "screw it up"!)?
Reply
Old May 3, 2014 | 07:35 AM
  #33  
jb78L-82's Avatar
jb78L-82
Le Mans Master
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,455
Likes: 977
From: RI, Now Franklin/Nashville TN
Default

Originally Posted by 69427
It's not incomplete combustion (there wasn't a bunch of fuel and oxygen just going along for the ride). Engines back then were always adjusted a bit on the rich side for drivability, so there was always insufficient oxygen in the A/F mix to burn all the fuel (regardless of timing). The AIR system was there to convert exhaust CO into CO2. For the air (oxygen) injection system to work efficiently the exhaust gas had to be damn hot (chemical reactions occur more readily at higher temperatures). By retarding the timing the exhaust exiting the cylinder is hotter than it would be if the timing was advanced properly (for economy and performance). (The retarded timing also lowered combustion temperature/pressure which also lowered NOx emissions.) When the injected air met the hot CO it converted the CO into CO2, harmless compared to CO.

Makes perfect sense in the chemistry world. With the government mandating the emission numbers, what other choice did the automakers have (other than stop producing the IC engine) than to alter the engine's timing (they didn't "screw it up"!)?


My only comment would be that the factory engines that I worked on back then (72 Chevrolet 400/73 Nova SS 350) as well as my 78 L-82 all had limiter screws on the carbs which were set to run LEAN not RICH to reduce emissions and to raise the combustion chamber temps.
Reply
Old May 3, 2014 | 07:56 AM
  #34  
LS4 PILOT's Avatar
LS4 PILOT
Melting Slicks
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,091
Likes: 40
Default

Broke the plastic pump fan blades off inside housing , plugged the rubber lines , 25 years ago. So basically my engine is turning pulleys , bearing and belts. My 74 doesn't even have to be inspected for brakes ,much less emissions garbage. I left the emissions garbage on for stock appearance . But I don't blame anyone for tossing it , just to get more elbow room to work in an already cramped area.


Seems I read somewhere the cheap little PVC valve added in the 60's took care of the majority of emission issues , and the other expensive stuff is to clean up the last 5 or 10 percent .....what I ve always heard anyway.
Reply
Old May 3, 2014 | 08:30 AM
  #35  
Super6's Avatar
Super6
Burning Brakes
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 925
Likes: 7
Default

Originally Posted by 69427
It's not incomplete combustion (there wasn't a bunch of fuel and oxygen just going along for the ride). Engines back then were always adjusted a bit on the rich side for drivability, so there was always insufficient oxygen in the A/F mix to burn all the fuel (regardless of timing). The AIR system was there to convert exhaust CO into CO2. For the air (oxygen) injection system to work efficiently the exhaust gas had to be damn hot (chemical reactions occur more readily at higher temperatures). By retarding the timing the exhaust exiting the cylinder is hotter than it would be if the timing was advanced properly (for economy and performance). (The retarded timing also lowered combustion temperature/pressure which also lowered NOx emissions.) When the injected air met the hot CO it converted the CO into CO2, harmless compared to CO.

Makes perfect sense in the chemistry world. With the government mandating the emission numbers, what other choice did the automakers have (other than stop producing the IC engine) than to alter the engine's timing (they didn't "screw it up"!)?
Sorry for my inaccurate statement on the process, I flunked Chemistry. The point I was trying to make was that with performance timing and full manifold vacuum advance like a lot of people run now, the A.I.R. system is made largely, if not totally, ineffective. Is the HP loss of the pump itself significant? No. Did the change in timing method hurt the car's performance? Yes.
Reply
Old May 3, 2014 | 08:30 AM
  #36  
gdh's Avatar
gdh
Le Mans Master
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 8,721
Likes: 108
From: Canada
Default

Originally Posted by Ontario73
Out of curiosity what was the outcome of said MOE inspection without the air pump? I have mine in a box due to running headers, but, have all other equipment intact. Interesting thing he said was that if an airpump is req'd the regs do not specify that it has to be working, just in place.

Tim
Mine never had an airpump. I do keep a copy of the page from the AIM that proves it stored in the rear compartment. It was having a breather that created the issue instead of venting into the air cleaner. He gave me a warning but logged my vette into their database so if ever pulled over again and I hadn't corrected the problem the car would be towed to one of their sites c/w fine.

MOE = Ministry of Environment, Ontario Canada.

Last edited by gdh; May 3, 2014 at 08:37 AM.
Reply
Old May 3, 2014 | 08:44 AM
  #37  
jb78L-82's Avatar
jb78L-82
Le Mans Master
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,455
Likes: 977
From: RI, Now Franklin/Nashville TN
Default

Originally Posted by gdh
Mine never had an airpump. I do keep a copy of the page from the AIM that proves it stored in the rear compartment. It was having a breather that created the issue instead of venting into the air cleaner. He gave me a warning but logged my vette into their database so if ever pulled over again and I hadn't corrected the problem the car would be towed to one of their sites c/w fine.

MOE = Ministry of Environment, Ontario Canada.
You Comrades need to abolish the Ministry Of Environment, although the EPA is not far behind!!
Reply

Get notified of new replies

To Why people remove smog pump?

Old May 3, 2014 | 09:48 AM
  #38  
mrvette's Avatar
mrvette
Team Owner
Active Streak: 120 Days
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 65,492
Likes: 230
From: Orange Park Florida
Default

Originally Posted by 69427
It's not incomplete combustion (there wasn't a bunch of fuel and oxygen just going along for the ride). Engines back then were always adjusted a bit on the rich side for drivability, so there was always insufficient oxygen in the A/F mix to burn all the fuel (regardless of timing). The AIR system was there to convert exhaust CO into CO2. For the air (oxygen) injection system to work efficiently the exhaust gas had to be damn hot (chemical reactions occur more readily at higher temperatures). By retarding the timing the exhaust exiting the cylinder is hotter than it would be if the timing was advanced properly (for economy and performance). (The retarded timing also lowered combustion temperature/pressure which also lowered NOx emissions.) When the injected air met the hot CO it converted the CO into CO2, harmless compared to CO.

Makes perfect sense in the chemistry world. With the government mandating the emission numbers, what other choice did the automakers have (other than stop producing the IC engine) than to alter the engine's timing (they didn't "screw it up"!)?
Man, that sounds damn close to some article I read maybe 40 years ago in some hotrod rag.....been a while, but that was my understanding of the changes also....not that I remembered much in buzzwords.....

And YES the PCV valve is a good thing, the smell in the garage gets worse than a skank very quick without it.....

Fuel smell is interesting, I kept the canister on my '72, but noted that the vacuum controlled valve on top was stuck open...so the vent line from the tank going forward into the canister was always open to the engine from the canister.....I plumbed it into the above throttle blade spot, ported vacuum I think is the phrase.....I have a PCV hooked up to full mani vac.....I have the fuel canister T'd off with a line to one of the valve covers, and NO SMELLS OF ANY KIND.....

I cheat though having DPFI on it, old batch fire setup, nothing super high tech.....

Last edited by mrvette; May 3, 2014 at 09:57 AM.
Reply
Old May 3, 2014 | 10:02 AM
  #39  
gdh's Avatar
gdh
Le Mans Master
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 8,721
Likes: 108
From: Canada
Default

Originally Posted by jb78L-82
You Comrades need to abolish the Ministry Of Environment, although the EPA is not far behind!!
Well we just had a provincial election call yesterday, vote is June 12th.
Reply
Old May 3, 2014 | 11:25 AM
  #40  
bluedawg's Avatar
bluedawg
Safety Car
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,736
Likes: 56
From: anchorage ak
Default

Any thing smog related is evil and must be removed and destroyed...
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:49 PM.

story-0
10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Corvettes that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 10:34:17


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer

A lot of money has changed hands at the online auction house over the years.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-03 10:21:50


VIEW MORE
story-2
10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: 10 great gifts Corvette enthusiasts actually want for Father's Day!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:40


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

Slideshow: These are the quirks, annoyances, and oddly lovable problems that every Corvette owner eventually learns to live with.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-28 09:31:39


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

Slideshow: 10 reasons why the C6 Z06 is still a performance benchmark after 20 years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 17:20:09


VIEW MORE
story-5
How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

Slideshow: How much horsepower every Corvette engine lost in 1972.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:54:53


VIEW MORE
story-6
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

Slideshow: How to Protect A Convertible Top: 10 DOs & DON'Ts

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-03 00:00:00


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

Slideshow: The 10 most explosive Corvettes ever built based on power-to-weight ratio.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-20 07:23:03


VIEW MORE
story-8
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

Slideshow: From C1 to C8 we compare every Corvette generation by the numbers.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 16:54:12


VIEW MORE
story-9
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

Slideshow: Some Corvette pace cars became collectible legends, while others perfectly captured the look and attitude of their era.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-11 09:50:51


VIEW MORE