When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I had my 68' dyno tested ad the "Dyno Day at Mike Norris Motorsports"!
I gained the horsepower back that I lost after fixing my gas pedal problem. For those who haven't read my previous posts - I had the car initially dynoed at 324.3 RWHP a couple of weeks back. After that dyno run - I found out that I was running only 70% throttle. I fixed the problem with the gas pedal linkage and had the car re-dynoed a couple of days later. The power dropped to 300 RWHP :eek: with full throttle!! Since then I changed my plug wires, plugs and gapping. I gained the lost power back. This time I dynoed at 325.3 RWHP with full throttle!. There was a lot of black smoke coming out at certain RPMs... Some MAJOR tuning and a carb change needs to be done and I'm sure that it will be possible to free up at least another 30 - 40 HP. I will also remove the inserts in my exhaust which should add another 5 - 10 HP... I hope that re-curving the distributor will make some change too!!!
I think I have a similar problem. I street raced a friend with a 15 second flat CRX (he pulled away from me...very embarrassing) and when I was backing down I found that when I pulled my foot slowly of the gas from WOT the car actually accelerated faster at what seemed to be about 90% throttle. I am guessing that it's the vacuum advance feed. backing off the throttle a bit could be adding more advance to the distributor. I'll need to check this with a vacuum gauge attached to the vacuum advance hose the next time I go out for some WOTs.
I think I have a similar problem. I street raced a friend with a 15 second flat CRX (he pulled away from me...very embarrassing) and when I was backing down I found that when I pulled my foot slowly of the gas from WOT the car actually accelerated faster at what seemed to be about 90% throttle. I am guessing that it's the vacuum advance feed. backing off the throttle a bit could be adding more advance to the distributor. I'll need to check this with a vacuum gauge attached to the vacuum advance hose the next time I go out for some WOTs.
I have a general tuning problem on my Vette. I also have to go with a mech. secondaries carb. I don't trust the vacuum controlled secondaries.. I also will have my distributor recurved when Lars is here... Those changes should make a big difference - especially because I know that WOT will be really WOT with a mech. secondaries carb...
Oliver,
I'm glad to hear that you got back the 20 or so lost HP!!! I think once Lars recurves youd dist. you will find some more, along with the fuel system changes you want to try.
I hope he can find me some more HP when he is here and does my distributor :cheers:
Oliver,
I'm glad to hear that you got back the 20 or so lost HP!!! I think once Lars recurves youd dist. you will find some more, along with the fuel system changes you want to try.
I hope he can find me some more HP when he is here and does my distributor :cheers:
I hope that everything works out and I can really improve the performance by quite a bit.. I have seen less radical engines dyno at more HP than mine.. Something must be wrong.. As soon as I get my first run with 13.1 A/F the power should be much better... However - that takes a lot of tuning... I will probably have the car dyno-tuned as soon as the distributor will be re-curved and the new carb installed (and the restrictor in the pipes removed)
Glad to hear you got your power back, I feel you have more in there once the carb in tuned right, check your plugs again b4 you go in case they get fouled out.
if total timing is good now, the recurve will not change peak power, just bring in more power at lower rpm.
funny how one earlier test showed too lean, now you complain of black smoke. My cars have o2 sensors to sort this stuff out.
Glad to hear you got your power back, I feel you have more in there once the carb in tuned right, check your plugs again b4 you go in case they get fouled out.
I will check my plugs tonite.. I think that the carb change will make a lot of difference.. At least I hope so.. Something must be wrong that I only produce 325 RWHP on a engine that is supposed to have at least 370 RWHP... I'm also curious to see how many HP I will gain by removing the CCI inserts from my exhaust and run open headers...
if total timing is good now, the recurve will not change peak power, just bring in more power at lower rpm.
funny how one earlier test showed too lean, now you complain of black smoke. My cars have o2 sensors to sort this stuff out.
At what RPM is the timing supposed to go to total timing?? My setup is supposed to have 23 degrees at idle and 38 degrees total timing...
I would like to install a o2 sensor but I don't want to drill a hole in my pipes to mount it... After changing the carb - I'm thinking in having the car dyno-tuned... I want to get a A/F of 12.9 - 13.0 on the dyno. One of the dyno guys told me that on the track you usually run leaner because of the increased air flow...
i picked up a used set of headers for $35 and drilled 8 holes for the sensors. it is not that big of a deal.
after tuning(on the street, not the dyno), put the pretty set back on.
No need to change carbs if you do this, just dial in the one you have..
Othewise it is expensive guessing; dyno $$ for every combo.
good luck :cheers:
i picked up a used set of headers for $35 and drilled 8 holes for the sensors. it is not that big of a deal.
after tuning(on the street, not the dyno), put the pretty set back on.
No need to change carbs if you do this, just dial in the one you have..
Othewise it is expensive guessing; dyno $$ for every combo.
good luck :cheers:
Well - I use Sidemount headers with Sidepipes. Regular headers won't hook up to the sidepipes... :( :(. I want to change my carb anyway to a mechanical secondaries carb. I should be able to get good $$ for my current carb. (I have over $400 in my current carb)... I will try to get at least $250 for it and I'm going to spend $350 for the mech. secondaries carb. I think that a mech. secondaries carb is definetely a better choice for a single plane intake.. The 4160 also only has a single pump...
What kind of a cam and heads do you have? I was wondering about why your profile lists 383/465 hp and the dyno runs indicate @ 400 at the crank.
I can see advantages to vacuum seconds. I have always had a double pumper on mine and I don't believe that it's any faster than an equivolent CFM Vac. carb because I tried a Edelbrock 750 for a short period of time. Both carbs were setup nearly the best posible. gkull had the Edel. sitting around so we installed it.
What kind of a cam and heads do you have? I was wondering about why your profile lists 383/465 hp and the dyno runs indicate @ 400 at the crank.
I can see advantages to vacuum seconds. I have always had a double pumper on mine and I don't believe that it's any faster than an equivolent CFM Vac. carb because I tried a Edelbrock 750 for a short period of time. Both carbs were setup nearly the best posible. gkull had the Edel. sitting around so we installed it.
My cam is a custom ground SOLID cam with following specs:
238/248 degrees @ .050, .525/.540 lift
The heads are DART IRON EAGLE with 215 cc intake runners - ported (probably only stage 1 porting). The heads have bronze guides, 1.480 COMP dual springs, LUNATI Roller Rockers.... BTW- The engine is a 383 with steel crank, 9.8:1 CR. I had somebody input the specs of the engine in a desktop dyno and it came up with 477 HP.... Somthing is wrong....
I have heared that mech. secondaries carbs are better for single plane intakes but I don't know.
We both have about the same type of cam. I have 1.6 CC roller tips and you have more cubes and better heads. Heres my cam. With Crane cams you need to match the compression to the cam so I have about 10.5 with very ported 186 casting 2.02/1.6
1. PowerMax Mechanical Lifter Camshafts for Non-Emissions Controlled Vehicles
Application Series & Grind Number
Fair idle, moderate performance usage, good mid-range HP, bracket racing, 3400-3800 cruise RPM, 10.0 to 11.5 compression ratio advised. Basic RPM 3000-6500 PowerMax F-278-2
replacing:
CC-278-2
We both have about the same type of cam. I have 1.6 CC roller tips and you have more cubes and better heads. Heres my cam. With Crane cams you need to match the compression to the cam so I have about 10.5 with very ported 186 casting 2.02/1.6
1. PowerMax Mechanical Lifter Camshafts for Non-Emissions Controlled Vehicles
Application Series & Grind Number
Fair idle, moderate performance usage, good mid-range HP, bracket racing, 3400-3800 cruise RPM, 10.0 to 11.5 compression ratio advised. Basic RPM 3000-6500 PowerMax F-278-2
replacing:
CC-278-2
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.