1979 Temperature Sender unit
I suspect I have a double whammy .. both the sender unit and gauge. We tested the gauge and it is reading high but I have no reference points on the sender unit.
One of the complications I have is mine is an early 79 and I have found a number of 78 parts(guess they were left over in the parts bin).
Any thoughts greatly appreciated.
I was trying to track down the resistance the sender unit should provide at different temperatures for a 1979. Wilcox had provided the required ohms at the gauge for a 79
For some reason, I skipped over 78 and 79. I arrived home this morning, but I've not had a chance to dig up what he needs.
Let me take a look in a few minutes.
Willcox
100 - 315
1st mark - 119
220 - 89
2nd mark 61
middle of orange 44
280 39
http://www.lbfun.com/warehouse/tech_...g%20gauges.pdf
what had the following detail for a "typical" sender unit
Temp Resistance
100 410
110 355
120 300
130 240
140 187
150 171
160 150
170 134
180 123
190 112
200 94
210 83.5
211 83.0
I asked Lectric Limited but they said "We do not release the operating specs. for the sending units. The specs. are proprietary information."
At the gauge, I have been experimenting and the data I have at the moment (its not 100% accurate as I made the mistake of ordering a 1 turn potentiometer and am waiting on a 10 turn to be more accurate) is
Temp or Mark Req Ohms Observed Ohms
100 315 440
1st Mark 119 150
220 89 92
2nd Mark 61 63
280 39 44
What I'm struggling with is probably three questions:
1. What should the resistance at the sender unit (if working correctly) be at 160 degrees?
2. What should the resistance at the sender unit (if working correctly) be at 180 degrees?
3. What would the temperature be at 119 ohms resistance ie the 1st mark (if the gauge is working correctly)?
That's what I know at the moment, any thoughts greatly appreciated.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
100 - 315
1st mark - 119
220 - 89
2nd mark 61
middle of orange 44
280 39
This scale.. it is the required input to make the dash unit operate correctly IMHO.
The inputs were derived from testing original NOS gauges, Original used gauges and compiling date over and over. This issue at hand can all go away by installing an adjustable resistor. You can then match your dash unit to the sender.
As you can see.. your sample data is close to mine. My data is what I use to calibrate with Period! And while data can be different per each particular gauge, I afraid my friend you suffer from the same OCD issue I have... lol
What you'll see in testing is the lower the temp the higher the variance. The higher the temp the less margin for error or tighter variance. Make sense (god I hope not).. lol
Willcox...
Last edited by Willcox Corvette; Oct 21, 2014 at 07:35 AM.
What I'm struggling with is probably three questions:
1. What should the resistance at the sender unit (if working correctly) be at 160 degrees?
2. What should the resistance at the sender unit (if working correctly) be at 180 degrees?
3. What would the temperature be at 119 ohms resistance ie the 1st mark (if the gauge is working correctly)?
That's what I know at the moment, any thoughts greatly appreciated.
I swear you're gonna make me have nightmares tonight over-thinking this again. . . .
If you are testing, get yourself a 10 or 15 turn pot and have at it.. If your dash unit is working at 220 (aprox. 89 ohms) then 180 should be fine as well. I would concentrate on the first mark, 220 and the second mark before I worried about anything else.. you get those close and you'll be fine.
Willcox
Last edited by Willcox Corvette; Oct 21, 2014 at 07:37 AM.
https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums...willcox-d.html
I've worked on this for over a year.. this is the answer to any dash to sender issue.
and yes, my ocd is hurting right now.
This resistor creates a linear change to a non linear gauge.. Pretty swank I might add.

Willcox
Last edited by Willcox Corvette; Oct 20, 2014 at 08:41 PM.








