When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Yeah, pretty interesting stuff.
It kind of looks like the spring set up on these heads are heavy for the application. The springs need a diet. They are heavy and hard to control due to their own weight.
It seems like it could be better in this application to have a lighter spring then shim it up to the pressures I need to control the valve and not waste so much of the spring's energy controlling it's own surging.
Also in that article caught the part about shimming a max of .090" then if more is still needed, use spring locators.
Beehives. They are running a lot less seat and open pressure, lighter weight and bump your useable rpm up a lot with minimal harmonics due to the design. Do a search on the LS6 beehives $60, 787-16 Comp retainers $50, stock locks, might need locators. Worked with Pauldana on a set for his old engine and he was pulling 7000+ RPM with no issues. GM is using them with 6500-7000 RPM redlines. http://www.summitracing.com/parts/NAL-12499224/
Beehives. They are running a lot less seat and open pressure, lighter weight and bump your useable rpm up a lot with minimal harmonics due to the design. Do a search on the LS6 beehives $60, 787-16 Comp retainers $50, stock locks, might need locators. Worked with Pauldana on a set for his old engine and he was pulling 7000+ RPM with no issues. GM is using them with 6500-7000 RPM redlines. http://www.summitracing.com/parts/NAL-12499224/
Beehives are reeeeealy critical to being set up right. They don't tolerate too much c/b clearance at all and if one breaks, there's nothing to keep the valve from falling into the cyl. and hitting a piston. You're much better off with a single/damper or dual spring.
Another thing to consider when you start tightening up the c/b clearance to anything tighter than ~.050 is that you need to check everything very carefully. You need to put each spring in a vise and measure actual coil bind as it can vary .020-.030" per set, and you have to check installed height on every valve and be able to get them all within +/- a few thou. This also trickles down to the rest of the cyl head to things like valve job depths, spring pocket depths and valve overall lengths.
Beehives are reeeeealy critical to being set up right. They don't tolerate too much c/b clearance at all
After you mentioned the down fall of a broken beehive spring I went looking for such occurrences. I didn't have to look too hard.
So it sounds like maybe the set up peculiarities could be a large part of the reason for failure of these springs? Kinda a, "get it right or pay the price" deal.
Another thing to consider when you start tightening up the c/b clearance to anything tighter than ~.050 is that you need to check everything very carefully.
Pretty sure that would be above my pay grade at this point.
I did measure the coil bind on several of these springs. So far they are all 1.080" give or take a couple thousandths. Makes coil bind even farther away than advertised.
Dart did tell me that they found coil bind at 1.080" as well. At the time I thought it was a good thing.
Beehives are reeeeealy critical to being set up right. They don't tolerate too much c/b clearance at all and if one breaks, there's nothing to keep the valve from falling into the cyl. and hitting a piston. You're much better off with a single/damper or dual spring.
Another thing to consider when you start tightening up the c/b clearance to anything tighter than ~.050 is that you need to check everything very carefully. You need to put each spring in a vise and measure actual coil bind as it can vary .020-.030" per set, and you have to check installed height on every valve and be able to get them all within +/- a few thou. This also trickles down to the rest of the cyl head to things like valve job depths, spring pocket depths and valve overall lengths.
They work well if properly set up. GM runs them in everything many with 100,000 mile powertrain warrantees and 6500 RPM redlines. The spring I linked has a max lift of .560. It is used in the Corvette ZO6 LS6, and the 638 HP supercharged LS9 ZR1 and Beehive springs are standard for the past 20 years in all LS engines including the the LSX 454. In a street build with occasional bursts to 6500 it is a proven, economical alternative that works and has been used in every corvette built by GM in the past 20 years. I can see an issue if it breaks. In a dedicated race engine would not be the best option as far as that goes but GM apparently has no problem using them in really severe applications.
They work well if properly set up. GM runs them in everything many with 100,000 mile powertrain warrantees and 6500 RPM redlines. The spring I linked has a max lift of .560. It is used in the Corvette ZO6 LS6, and the 638 HP supercharged LS9 ZR1 and Beehive springs are standard for the past 20 years in all LS engines including the the LSX 454. In a street build with occasional bursts to 6500 it is a proven, economical alternative that works and has been used in every corvette built by GM in the past 20 years. I can see an issue if it breaks. In a dedicated race engine would not be the best option as far as that goes but GM apparently has no problem using them in really severe applications.
Key phrase:if they are set up properly. GM has pretty unlimited resources and control to do just that. I'm just trying to make sure others understand you don't just go throwing a set of beehives on an aftermarket set of heads without knowing their idiosyncrasies. Lot more room for error with a traditional spring that will accomplish the exact same thing.
They work well if properly set up. GM runs them in everything many with 100,000 mile powertrain warrantees and 6500 RPM redlines. The spring I linked has a max lift of .560. It is used in the Corvette ZO6 LS6, and the 638 HP supercharged LS9 ZR1 and Beehive springs are standard for the past 20 years in all LS engines including the the LSX 454. In a street build with occasional bursts to 6500 it is a proven, economical alternative that works and has been used in every corvette built by GM in the past 20 years. I can see an issue if it breaks. In a dedicated race engine would not be the best option as far as that goes but GM apparently has no problem using them in really severe applications.
GM has the millions to frequency test any spring and cam combination. The average guy will not spend $250 an hour for spintron testing. I do not recommend these springs for any aftermarket camshaft unless they want to spintron test the combination.