When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I'm thinking on doing a cam swap in my Goodwrench 350 based small block. It currently has dished pistons and Vortec heads which add up to about 8.5 or 9.0:1 compression. I have a GMPP dual plane topped with a 625 Street Demon on the intake end and longtube headers on the exhaust end. Currently running 2.73 gears but might go up to 3.08and a 4 spd. I need the gears for decent highway cruising. I've been looking hard at the Comp Cams version of the old 300HP cam. I'm after more power of course but I like my grunt down low and never really spin the engine over 4500-5000 rpm. Any thoughts on my choice?
Vortec heads can only take 0.420 inch lift without getting the spring pockets machined or running very special springs. You will need to consider this before you buy a cam. They are great heads, but you need to cam them carefully.
Look at an isky 262 super cam- 208-208 @ 050 440 lift 108 lsa. Old school cam that works with low c r , auto trans and highway gears. Good mileage and easy on the valve train. Had one in a 305 el camino, nice cam.
figure 19cc's for the piston dish volume. Heads are more like 80cc's not 76 as advertised. Best case a .017" shim head gasket. 3.48 stroke, 4.00 bore, 5.7" rods.
Given those figures your at about 7.7:1 CR.
Plug those figures into this calculator to get your CR and DCR for a chosen cam. http://www.jeepstrokers.com/calculator/
Something on a 108 LSA will give more cylinder pressure/torque in the midrange.
Definately going to be down in the 250 ish duration or so range.
figure 19cc's for the piston dish volume. Heads are more like 80cc's not 76 as advertised. Best case a .017" shim head gasket. 3.48 stroke, 4.00 bore, 5.7" rods.
Given those figures your at about 7.7:1 CR.
Plug those figures into this calculator to get your CR and DCR for a chosen cam. http://www.jeepstrokers.com/calculator/
Something on a 108 LSA will give more cylinder pressure/torque in the midrange.
Definately going to be down in the 250 ish duration or so range.
He has Vortec 64 CC heads. That said I agree 100%. I would look at this cam if you want one off the shelf. http://www.summitracing.com/parts/cc...make/chevrolet
1.6 rockers on the intakes would be nice.
108 LSA cams with 250 duration are tough to buy off the shelf, limited selection. I would go with a Comp Cams Custom grind.
Part # 12-000-5
Grind # CS 5082/5207-H108 with a 104 ICL Gets you these specs.
Advertised duration 252/260.
Duration @ .050 208/212.
Lift W/ 1.5 rocker Int .447/ Exh .444
LSA 108 with 4 degrees advance ground in.
Check with Comp for correct springs for either cam.
Sorry I missed that it was vortec heads. That would get you up to 8.8CR. If head gasket is .017 and piston is .025" down the bore.
That being said it's a bit of a guess. So figure maybe 8.5 CR and work from there.
This could get you into a 260 advertised duration cam on a 108 LSA. Careful of the duration @.050. I wouldn't make it much over 210 or so for good torque.
Those 2.73 rear gears have got to be killing your low end and acceleration.
Have you considered a higher stall torque converter?
Have you done the timing and carb tuning for optimal power as well? Not that it would make it a tire burner with a 2.73 out back but it would help.
Yes, I've re-curved the distributor. The car has a Saginaw 4spd in it of all things. It does have a 3.11 first gear which makes the 2.73s a bit more livable. Still, putting around town I don't always use 4th. There seems to be some debate on just how much lift the stock Vortecs will take. The current cam specs at .383 int, .401 ex with a LSA of 112.
Here is a complete cam kit with timing chain and springs. http://www.summitracing.com/parts/cc...make/chevrolet
Lift is .432 and .444 respectively. If those heads are limited in lift then maybe a 1.4 ratio rockers instead of 1.5 and something like this could be used.
Stock ratio GM rockers are supposed to be 1.5 ratio. However they usually measure out to 1.4ish instead.
Maybe you could measure your valve lift and compare it to advertised lift to see what yours are at.
Just an option.
Last edited by REELAV8R; Jan 13, 2015 at 07:01 PM.
Yes, I've re-curved the distributor. The car has a Saginaw 4spd in it of all things. It does have a 3.11 first gear which makes the 2.73s a bit more livable. Still, putting around town I don't always use 4th. There seems to be some debate on just how much lift the stock Vortecs will take. The current cam specs at .383 int, .401 ex with a LSA of 112.
Stock Vortecs will handle between .450 and .480 depending on the casting. Retainer to seal is the pinch point. Current cam sucks. Your 2:73 with a 3.11 first get you an overall first gear of about 8.5 to 1. Saginaw ratio if it is a 3.11 first, it is a 2.20 2nd, 1.47 3rd, 1.00 4th. Percent drop gear to gear is 29% 1st to 2nd, 33% 2nd to 3rd, 32% 3rd to 4th. Really not bad. A 3.08 (9.58 to 1 first) or 3.36 rear gear (10.45 to 1) would help a lot.
Here is a complete cam kit with timing chain and springs.
Lift is .432 and .444 respectively. If those heads are limited to 1.4 ratio rockers instead of 1.5 then something like this could be used.
Stock ratio GM rockers are supposed to be 1.5 ratio. However they usually measure out to 1.4ish instead.
Maybe you could measure your valve lift and compare it to advertised lift to see what yours are at.
Just an option.
Vortec heads can only take 0.420 inch lift without getting the spring pockets machined or running very special springs. You will need to consider this before you buy a cam. They are great heads, but you need to cam them carefully.
Everywhere I've read said Vortecs are usually good to .470" lift, the springs to .450-.440 or so.
If you have high RPM valve float, you will be bouncing the valve retainers off the top of the valve guides with that much lift.
See post 1. Guy never spins past 4500-5000. LOTS of bad things happen with high rpm valve float, bouncing the retainers off the guides is the least of your worries, bouncing valves off the top of pistons is a much bigger concern. That said there are a couple economical ways to get vortecs to handle .525 or higher with no machining.