Tach Drive Distributor Question
I wonder if the brass button failure is due to customers installing it themselves, not realizing that it's more than just drill a hole in the side of the distributor to install the wall button. We machine the housing wall so when the button is installed the wall is the thickness it was originally.
The bushings upper and lower... boy there is a topic. I posted above that the bushings in most cases have to be re-sized after installed. If the bushings are driven in the housing and the clearance isn't correct the bushings will cease up on the shaft. I have to say that you at home builders need to be on your game when your own distributor.
IMHO,
Willcox
I threw it away before I took a photo, dammit.
Steve
I threw it away before I took a photo, dammit.
Steve
I wonder if the brass button failure is due to customers installing it themselves, not realizing that it's more than just drill a hole in the side of the distributor to install the wall button. We machine the housing wall so when the button is installed the wall is the thickness it was originally.
The bushings upper and lower... boy there is a topic. I posted above that the bushings in most cases have to be re-sized after installed. If the bushings are driven in the housing and the clearance isn't correct the bushings will cease up on the shaft. I have to say that you at home builders need to be on your game when your own distributor.
IMHO,
Willcox
I purchased a new main shaft and cross gear (with brass button). There was minimal wear in the housing, I drilled a partial hole in the housing from the inside, for the "peg" on the brass button.
I machined the surface of the brass button to achieve the correct end play.
Greased it up and re assembled.
Last summer I read here about the early failure of the brass buttons. I removed the dist and had a look, the button had no wear, just a bit shinny from the rotation of the cross gear, end play was still within spec.
I don't know if I have a good brass button or just good grease. I'll check it again in a few years.
The assembly itself with nothing (cable / tach) attached would probably last quite a few years and many miles with normal maintenance.
I think where the huge disparity between totally trashed vs mildly worn distributors comes in has a lot to do with the condition of the tach drive cable and the tach itself.
If the cable is dry or kinked, it's going to place a much bigger load on that side gear- Same with if the tach doesn't spin freely.
I've seen many a C3 with the tach cable running at all sorts of awkward angles as it attempts to attach to the distributor and that can't be good.
It's just a theory but believe it's very plausible.
The assembly itself with nothing (cable / tach) attached would probably last quite a few years and many miles with normal maintenance.
I think where the huge disparity between totally trashed vs mildly worn distributors comes in has a lot to do with the condition of the tach drive cable and the tach itself.
If the cable is dry or kinked, it's going to place a much bigger load on that side gear- Same with if the tach doesn't spin freely.
I've seen many a C3 with the tach cable running at all sorts of awkward angles as it attempts to attach to the distributor and that can't be good.
It's just a theory but believe it's very plausible.

Steve
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
The assembly itself with nothing (cable / tach) attached would probably last quite a few years and many miles with normal maintenance.
I think where the huge disparity between totally trashed vs mildly worn distributors comes in has a lot to do with the condition of the tach drive cable and the tach itself.
If the cable is dry or kinked, it's going to place a much bigger load on that side gear- Same with if the tach doesn't spin freely.
I've seen many a C3 with the tach cable running at all sorts of awkward angles as it attempts to attach to the distributor and that can't be good.
It's just a theory but believe it's very plausible.


Last edited by Paul L; Feb 28, 2015 at 08:24 AM.
I've even gone as far as rotating the position of the plug wires in relation to the cap just to ensure the tach cable is not unnecessarily bent when I set the advance where it needs to be on my 409 SBC.
The Bubbafied intake vacuum fitting and hoses have since been cleaned up. You gotta love these cars to drive them. The vacuum feed back to the TH400 was entirely rubber and rotted near the vacuum modulator. Some funny shifts at times! I replaced the modulator and installed a proper steel vacuum line last year.
Last edited by Paul L; Feb 28, 2015 at 04:50 PM.
The length of the tach cable itself.
With cars that are 45+ years old, there is a good chance that someone has replace the tach cable at one time or another.
How many people verify the length when replacing the cable to make sure that the cable isn't just a bit too long and bottoms out on the side gear, which in turn pre-loads the gear when you crank down the collar nut to the tach drive coupling?
You can ensure all day long that the gear has the appropriate clearance but if the cable is too long, it doesn't matter because the gear is forced to the bottom (back) of the housing.
Folks rebuilding these distributors would normally never see or know there was an issue because all they get is the distributor with munched gears.
I venture to guess that a majority of premature wear and destruction of cross gears and housings has more to do with binding/non-lubricated, too long cables than any manufacturing or design "defect" from Delco.
Just my .02, your mileage may vary.
The length of the tach cable itself.
With cars that are 45+ years old, there is a good chance that someone has replace the tach cable at one time or another.
How many people verify the length when replacing the cable to make sure that the cable isn't just a bit too long and bottoms out on the side gear, which in turn pre-loads the gear when you crank down the collar nut to the tach drive coupling?
You can ensure all day long that the gear has the appropriate clearance but if the cable is too long, it doesn't matter because the gear is forced to the bottom (back) of the housing.
Folks rebuilding these distributors would normally never see or know there was an issue because all they get is the distributor with munched gears.
I venture to guess that a majority of premature wear and destruction of cross gears and housings has more to do with binding/non-lubricated, too long cables than any manufacturing or design "defect" from Delco.
Just my .02, your mileage may vary.

My problem: This car/project came to me without a distributor or cable. I have no idea what a proper length a factory cable should be. I do have a significant "wow" in my aftermarket cable/distributor.

Steve

Steve

Steve
I still have the original cable, and the dist is "clocked" the same as Paul's.
It lasted 100,000 mi, and likely would have lasted longer if I had greased it every 10 years or so.


















