Another Camaro T5 Question
LINK: http://www.britishv8.org/articles/bo...t5-id-tags.htm
I have a 1979 L48 with the th350. When I bought the car I was told it had 3.55 rear gears, and the tach reads about 3500 at 80mph which seems right-ish. I have read that the th350 1st gear is 2.52:1. In that case it seems like a 4.06 first would be basically useless, but .76 OD would be about right. Obviously the V8 T5 with the 2.95 1st and .73 OD is the way to go, but they are hard to find around here.
I have an angle on a 1986 V6 Camaro for <$600, which seems like it could provide a trans and clutch parts with enough junk left over to break even on the purchase. The camaro trans is supposedly good to 280 ftlb, and my engine made barely 285 peak over 35 years ago.
Am I stupid to even consider this as an option? I have a th350 that slips badly and likes to pop out of reverse, and a very limited budget due to some new school expenses. If this is a trans that will live and be usable behind my stock engine, that's good enough given that it is basically free.
Opinions?






I don't think V6 T5 were WC.
T5 have enough of a fragility reputation you want to put a world class one in.
Just to be clear, are you are saying the trans won't bolt to a proper V8 bellhousing or that the V6 bellhousing won't bolt to my engine? The latter I knew about, but I thought all the bellhousings were basically interchangable between all the T5s. Is this not the case?
The '86 V6 trans is not WC as far as I know. Am I going to blow it up with a tired L48 and normal street tires? The 97 V6 camaro trans should be WC and I might have found a working one, if it wouldn't have any problems that make it harder to install.






http://www.britishv8.org/articles/bo...t5-id-tags.htm
http://www.5speeds.com/t5/
http://www.moderndriveline.com/Techn...t5_history.htm
http://chris66dad.tripod.com/id38.html
I am going to scout some junkyards over the holiday and see what I can find, but V8 T5s seem pretty rare around here. If you have info on the '86 V6 Camaro T5, that would be very helpful.






I am going to scout some junkyards over the holiday and see what I can find, but V8 T5s seem pretty rare around here. If you have info on the '86 V6 Camaro T5, that would be very helpful.
Make sure you know where to find it, because there is another serial number on the transmission with the very same pattern which is not the right one (IIRC it's the tail housing serial #)
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
From what I understand all the bolt holes are already in the car to install the manual pedal box, it is just a PITA to do so. It might suck, but I am sure that will be doable as well.
Are the manual pedal assemblies the same from 68-79? This vendor seems to indicate they are:
http://www.4speedconversions.com/vette_pedals.html
If so, is this the part I want:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Used-Origina...-/291508593179
I am aware that the Camaro trans is rotated 18* or so, and will require an adapter to bolt to the cross member. It shouldn't be too hard to weld something up. Plumbing for the clutch shouldn't be too bad. I've seen people on here recommending master cylinders from Camaros, and one thread suggesting one from an '85 one-ton. Driveshaft also needs shortened, and a local shop gave a reasonable quote on that. I've read dozens of threads on shifter placement, and I guess I will deal with it when I get to that point.
Are there any other parts I should try to get from the Camaro while I'm at it? And, are there any dumb things I am missing? It looks like the U Joints on the Camaro driveshaft have 1.125" bearing caps while I think the C3 has 1.062" caps. Would a hybrid U joint like this work:
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/ied-5-793x/overview/
Thanks again, and sorry for all the first-timer questions. Sooner or later I'll get this all figured out.






Are the manual pedal assemblies the same from 68-79? This vendor seems to indicate they are:
http://www.4speedconversions.com/vette_pedals.html
If so, is this the part I want:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Used-Origina...-/291508593179
Pedal box is same for all years.
The ebay deal is pretty fair.
More of it here.
If you install your trans that way, you can use any SBC bellhousing you want (or a scattershield), and you can operate the clutch with the stock mechanical linkage (what I did).
Later on my thread I posted how to upgrade a 30$ Ebay short throw shifter, it may interrest you, as well a the rest of the installation.
However, as far as I can tell '89 camaros are supposed to have mechanical speedometers and this trans has the sender for an electronic one. I expect that issue will be easy to solve, but it was surprising.
The shifter goes smoothly into all the gears and the input/output shafts spin freely with no binding or funny sounds, and the ATF that dripped out onto my tarp looked clean and clear. I think I am going to skip rebuilding and just put it in the car and run it. Hopefully it goes well

I have the clutch from the Camaro, but I wasn't able to get the flywheel. Would a regular 89 camaro flywheel be good enough? Do I need to match the flywheel tooth count to my flexplate, or does it not matter?






Too bad you couldn't get the flywheel, because while those can resurfaced, you'd better buy a new clutch.
You want to keep the same amount of tooth or you'll have to change the starter.
Do I need one of the magical billet steel flywheels? Or is a regular cast iron one sufficient?
I am looking at one of the Summit-brand flywheels and a super-cheap clutch kit. May also just get something from a local parts store. I dont imagine my stock (and very tired) l48 will break either, but suggestions are welcome.
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/su...make/chevrolet
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/zz...t/model/camaro
Am I going to regret cheaping out on clutch parts?
Also, for hydraulics, do I want to go with normal the Camaro master/slave cylinder? Or is there a better way?
Thanks again.
NAPA ordered the wrong flywheel (I didnt think the 168 tooth one would fit in the T5 bell. Turns out it does not) so I should hopefully get the clutch in tomorrow when the new flywheel shows up. I am going to take the trans to the carwash tomorrow and get it cleaned up and installed so I can mark the tunnel for the shifter.
I'm really stuck on the clutch hydraulics though. How have other people solved the clutch plumbing? I saw a post about using brake line, but I dont understand how it would handle the flex in the driveline.
I have a slave cylinder from a Camaro, but I am having a tough time finding what line/fittings to use. The best I have come up with is a 3AN fitting from Autozone that goes into the clutch slave, and I will have to attach a 3AN fitted line to it. I see people recommend a clutch master from an 85 one-ton, and I am hoping it uses the same "quick disconnect" fitting as the Camaro slave. Otherwise I'm hosed.
However, as far as I can tell '89 camaros are supposed to have mechanical speedometers and this trans has the sender for an electronic one. I expect that issue will be easy to solve, but it was surprising.
The shifter goes smoothly into all the gears and the input/output shafts spin freely with no binding or funny sounds, and the ATF that dripped out onto my tarp looked clean and clear. I think I am going to skip rebuilding and just put it in the car and run it. Hopefully it goes well

I have the clutch from the Camaro, but I wasn't able to get the flywheel. Would a regular 89 camaro flywheel be good enough? Do I need to match the flywheel tooth count to my flexplate, or does it not matter?
My T5 WC is the 1352-176 transmission.
As far as I know, that is the last year (1988) for mechanical speedometers.
I've not installed it in the car yet, so I'm following your post here :- )
My car: 1969, 4 speed, 3.70












