When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Actually, Mr. Kacyc3, the interesting point of my investigation was that GM recommended 20/20 tire pressure for the first-year application of their RADIAL tire. I do not know why.
In later years (from 1974 to 1982), the recommended tire pressure increased incrementally as the tire width also ultimately increased from 225 to 255. This culminated in the 1982 recommended tire pressure of 35/35 for the widest tire they had yet fitted to the car.
This is an interesting counterpoint to Mr. TooBroke's assertion that the tire width is instrumental in his ability to run lower tire pressures.
As I said a couple of times earlier, I suspect that as Radial Tires continued their development over the 'early' years, the structural adjustments required that more and more pressure be run for the contact patch to maintain its shape. It is very difficult to find historical information on this hypothesis.
The "most modern" data point we have is that of the 1982 Corvette. And the recommended tire pressures are exceedingly similar to those found on other period, and later, cars.
I'll say it this way:
If I take my BFG tire and put it on a 1982, the door sill says I should run 35 PSI. So I start with 35 PSI. I take THAT SAME TIRE on THAT SAME RIM and put it on a 1974. The door sill NOW says I can run 20 PSI. So I deflate my tire to 20 PSI and go on my merry way.
Makes sense, right?
I'm sorry, but it does not to me.
From 1970 to 1982 to NOW, we had different gas, different brake fluid, different oil, different lots of stuff. Why is it such a stretch that tire technology also changed in a way that requires a different approach to pressure?
I figured it was carried over because thats the stickers they had made already from the bias ply tires and they didnt know enough about radial tires yet.
When the centers wear out and the sides still have 3/8" of tread the tires are WAY over inflated and it doesn't take much intelligence to figure that out.
Just about everyone on this site has the ability to look at and read what the pressure should be on the tire. Why -because it's written on them. If you want to run something else go ahead, just don't try and convince people that what you say is right. If you get such great mileage running a lower pressure that's great for you but I bet if you took the time to go out and look and read the stated pressure you would find out your wrong. There are alot of people that maintain their cars as they see fit and have fun with them while changing what they came from the factory with.
Go clean your headlights.
Last edited by Doug Kraft; Dec 4, 2015 at 12:30 PM.
First, I completely disagree with the linear relationship between rated tire capacity and weight bore by said tire. There is zero merit in the argument that "because a tire rated at 2,000# only carries 500#, so I can run 1/4 the pressure required for it to carry 2,000#". Zero merit.
I've posted MULTIPLE times to produce a single reputable source to back up that ridiculous claim. Response = cricket....cricket....cricket.....
Originally Posted by keithinspace
The key factor that needs to be measured/discussed instead of sidewall bulge is the relative pressures being imparted ACROSS the contact patch of the tire. The Tire Rack article that was shared previously does the best job of demonstrating this issue.
Contact patch pressure is the key. Measuring sidewall bulge is meaningless and just shows how little some mechanical engineers really know.
Originally Posted by keithinspace
MOST of us seem to be on the same page. This will be my final post trying to convince the outliers of the merits in properly pressurized tires. There really aren't many other facts I can offer on the subject.
Most? It's all except one. You've given great information without making stupid claims because "I'm an engineer so I know better".
Once again what tires are you running that say maximum pressure 35 psi?
Toobroke,
As you have done on other topics here in the past, you fail to respond to posts that ask relevant questions or contain research info (in this case done by Tire Rack, which has no motivation to publish such data other than to inform the public) that doesn't support your opinion. For once, man up and answer to the link above- with actual research data, not just a regurgitation of your simple minded opinions.
Then answer the question asked by Kacyc3- asked for the third time in this thread- exactly what tires are you running?
Then answer the question asked by Kacyc3- asked for the third time in this thread- exactly what tires are you running?
They're BF Goodrich T/A radials but in the past I ran several sets of Dunlops (before they got discontinued) and several sets of Coopers.
When the centers of tires are worn out and they still have 3/8" of tread on the sides the tires are over inflated. What is it about that you can't understand? Over inflation wears out centers.
They're BF Goodrich T/A radials but in the past I ran several sets of Dunlops (before they got discontinued) and several sets of Coopers.
When the centers of tires are worn out and they still have 3/8" of tread on the sides the tires are over inflated. What is it about that you can't understand? Over inflation wears out centers.
Exactly how does that answer to the test info from Tire Rack?
Corvette Stories
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)
Joe Kucinski
Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!
Brett Foote
Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!
Michael S. Palmer
10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know
Joe Kucinski
5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2
Michael S. Palmer
2027 Corvette vs The World: Every C8 vs Its Closest Competitor
Joe Kucinski
10 Most Common Corvette Problems of the Last 20 Years!
Joe Kucinski
5 MOST and 5 LEAST Popular Corvette Model Years in History!
They're BF Goodrich T/A radials but in the past I ran several sets of Dunlops (before they got discontinued) and several sets of Coopers.
When the centers of tires are worn out and they still have 3/8" of tread on the sides the tires are over inflated. What is it about that you can't understand? Over inflation wears out centers.
We all agree that overinflation will wear out the centers but, telling someone to run 20 psi in their tires if they aren't built for that is dangerous.
I think I figured out the miscommunication between everyone. Your tires are rated a max of 35 psi, if we use the same formula that new tires use (max pressure 44 psi)= (32 recommended psi) 32/44 = .72%
(%) x 35 (PSI) = 25.5 PSI. (This is just a theory and you should contact your tire manufacturer to confirm this pressure is correct.)
We all agree that overinflation will wear out the centers but, telling someone to run 20 psi in their tires if they aren't built for that is dangerous.
I think I figured out the miscommunication between everyone. Your tires are rated a max of 35 psi, if we use the same formula that new tires use (max pressure 44 psi)= (32 recommended psi) 32/44 = .72%
(%) x 35 (PSI) = 25.5 PSI. (This is just a theory and you should contact your tire manufacturer to confirm this pressure is correct.)
Where does that 44 psi come from? I bought these latest tires in the summer of last year and they have a maximum pressure rating of 35 psi just like all of the other 255X60R15's I bought in the past 27 years had. The recommended RUNNING pressure of a tire is a lot different from the maximum pressure printed on the side wall. The tire manufacturer doesn't determine what pressure a tire is to be run at; the vehicle manufacturer does that based on the weight the tire will be supporting.
The recommended RUNNING pressure of a tire is a lot different from the maximum pressure printed on the side wall. The tire manufacturer doesn't determine what pressure a tire is to be run at; the vehicle manufacturer does that based on the weight the tire will be supporting.
Therefore, the recommended RUNNING pressure is 35 PSI for a 255/60R15 based on the last information provided by General Motors via the sill plate on the 1982 Corvette. That was for a 2 passenger vehicle that has a total cargo-carrying capacity of 450 lbs. As pictured in my (way) earlier post.
The recommended running pressure is set by the manufacturer, not the tire company.
And it was incrementally adjusted upward by General Motors for radial tires on the Chevrolet Corvette from 1974 to 1982.
By golly, I think you hit the nail on the head!!! I TOTALLY AGREE WITH YOU!!! THIS IS AWESOME!!!
Sorry. I said I was done, but I had to jump in as soon as saw that we had finally resolved this issue.
Last edited by keithinspace; Dec 4, 2015 at 03:39 PM.
I'd like to ask a question that is a little off the subject, but also relevant to the discussion relative to being able to see true wear in a tire.
Who has replaced a set of tires on their car due to road wear (not burnouts, not track use...I'm talking around-town and interstate miles) and not due to age?
I don't want to turn this into a "how many miles do you drive in a year" thread, but honestly...I just replaced my two rear tires that dated from 1982. They still had A TON of tread on them. And based on my driving habits, it will take me well over 15 years to "wear out" a set of tires.
Point being, my tires will be long replaced before I actually have the opportunity to "see" the true wear pattern in the tread.
Where does that 44 psi come from? I bought these latest tires in the summer of last year and they have a maximum pressure rating of 35 psi just like all of the other 255X60R15's I bought in the past 27 years had. The recommended RUNNING pressure of a tire is a lot different from the maximum pressure printed on the side wall. The tire manufacturer doesn't determine what pressure a tire is to be run at; the vehicle manufacturer does that based on the weight the tire will be supporting.
max 44 psi is rating on every tire I can remember installing on my car or another when I was working in a shop and what the tires on my DD say (probably alot of other people also). It also supports everyone saying tires should have 32 PSI in them (based on a 44 PSI MAX.)
A car manufacturer not using recommended pressure that a tire manufacturer told them to use is what Ford did that caused so many problem in 2000-2002. I worked at a Firestone dealer after this and they still maintain it was Fords fault (I was reluctant to believe, ya know blame someone else). Google it and go to reputable sites and read, first I found was Wiki, didn't believe that as users upload/upate and change that info. Second was something else followed suit with Wiki, then I cam across that link for time that I posted earlier that confirmed Ford went against Firestone recommendations. This only leads to 1 question, you dont use the same tires the car came with model or size so, why would you believe a 20PSI rating from 46 years ago?
Well, I just got off the phone with my closest America's Tire store. They have a program that allows you to enter a specific vehicle along with a specific tire and, based upon the weight of the vehicle, give the correct PSI for that tire. I had the guy query the system for a '69 Vette and the BFG Radial T/A tire in 255/60/15. I chose the '69 because it's the lightest C3 other than possibly the '68, and therefore it would tolerate the lowest PSI for C3s. I explained that we were having a discussion on the subject and that somebody was recommending PSI of 24/20 and, without knowing if I agreed with that or not, he said "Oh, that sounds low."
The results- their system recommends a minimum cold PSI of 26 for that tire on all 4 corners. Of course, hot PSI goes up by a few- and the weight in their system for C3s would be for the base car. The big blocks and other options would add weight and therefore make additional PSI a reasonable route to take. Additionally, as we all know, C3s gained weight throughout the years.
I'd like to ask a question that is a little off the subject, but also relevant to the discussion relative to being able to see true wear in a tire.
Who has replaced a set of tires on their car due to road wear (not burnouts, not track use...I'm talking around-town and interstate miles) and not due to age?
I don't want to turn this into a "how many miles do you drive in a year" thread, but honestly...I just replaced my two rear tires that dated from 1982. They still had A TON of tread on them. And based on my driving habits, it will take me well over 15 years to "wear out" a set of tires.
Point being, my tires will be long replaced before I actually have the opportunity to "see" the true wear pattern in the tread.
I'm in that group that has to replace tires due to age not wear at this point in time. I have a set of 12 year old BFG TA radials size 265/50R15 that I removed due to the age this past summer. I always run 30 psi. Using a measuring device going down to 1/32" I found no discernible difference across the tread on any of the tires. I have the car since 1973 and have replaced tires many times. When I was younger I put more annual mileage on but never had any abnormal wear in the center at 30 psi. Being a 1969 car the recommended tire pressure at the time was 24 psi for an F70x15. The first time I put on a larger 60 series radial you could visually see the tire patch was not correct at such a low pressure.
Well, I just got off the phone with my closest America's Tire store. They have a program that allows you to enter a specific vehicle along with a specific tire and, based upon the weight of the vehicle, give the correct PSI for that tire. I had the guy query the system for a '69 Vette and the BFG Radial T/A tire in 255/60/15. I chose the '69 because it's the lightest C3 other than possibly the '68, and therefore it would tolerate the lowest PSI for C3s. I explained that we were having a discussion on the subject and that somebody was recommending PSI of 24/20 and, without knowing if I agreed with that or not, he said "Oh, that sounds low."
The results- their system recommends a minimum cold PSI of 26 for that tire on all 4 corners. Of course, hot PSI goes up by a few- and the weight in their system for C3s would be for the base car. The big blocks and other options would add weight and therefore make additional PSI a reasonable route to take. Additionally, as we all know, C3s gained weight throughout the years.
What say you, toobroke?
I emailed BFG asking about pressure using a 71 bb car, auto response says 2-5 days for a response, good thing i don't need this info to get to work.
Good god!!
can we still say that or do we need to use a more politically correct term??
I always thought the tire manufacturer always out trumped the car manufactures data plate on tire pressure.
At least that's what I was taught even in the service.....Are you telling us even our government is lying??? lol
come-on now we all know that 20 psi is wrong it should be 17.5 psi
Good god!!
can we still say that or do we need to use a more politically correct term??
I always thought the tire manufacturer always out trumped the car manufactures data plate on tire pressure.
At least that's what I was taught even in the service.....Are you telling us even our government is lying??? lol
come-on now we all know that 20 psi is wrong it should be 17.5 psi
we could go down that road, if I remember correctly i think I heard most slicks for or cars run like 12 psi.