When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Odd Solid Roller Valve Lash Observation While Adjusting
I am running solid roller cam with a fairly aggressive cam. I am using the EO/IC method to adjust. This states that when the exhaust valve begins to open, the intake lifter is on the base circle. I set the cold lash on the intake rocker just as the exhaust valve on cylinder 8 started to close to 0.015. I then moved on to cylinder 4 to adjust the intake rocker there just as the exhaust started to open. This is where it gets weird, at this point the exhaust valve for cylinder #8 was almost all the way open so I thought I would recheck the lash assuming it should still be 0.015 but was shocked to see it was 0.020! It increased by .005". I did the same thing on cylinder 4 and it did not change from one position to the other. This is a new engine. Not even broken yet fully other than some engine dyno runs. What would cause this? I will check the others as I go.
You want to follow the EO/IC method. That means you set the intake as the exhaust starts to OPEN( E))....and the exhaust when the Intake is CLOSING..about halfway through it's closing cycle (IC).
Run through them again...you've got the concept..just fudged it a little.
JIM
Last edited by 427Hotrod; Dec 14, 2015 at 09:20 PM.
Hotrod is correct. work through the firing order Starting at #1
Thanks for the quick reply guys, OK, as far as I know, the base circle should be the lowest point on the cam, the point closest to the cam axial center line. My concern is that if I follow the method and measure my intake lash just when the exhaust valve starts to open, it actually increases to a maximum value when the exhaust valve is fully open. If I set it 0.015 initially, it opens to 0.20 at full exhaust. It only does this for cylinder #8. I have a couple of others that increase 0.001.
You need to ck for something binding. A pushrod dragging the side of the head, a rocker bottoming on a stud or something like that. Or a goofy cam grinding job. I've had pushrods lightly drag head on one cylinder and it would feel tighter than it was when adjusting.
I've run some pretty nasty cams and this system always works whether it's mild or wild. Since it only happens on one cylinder..something is happening there.
JIM
Last edited by 427Hotrod; Dec 14, 2015 at 10:26 PM.
You need to ck for something binding. A pushrod dragging the side of the head, a rocker bottoming on a stud or something like that. Or a goofy cam grinding job. I've had pushrods lightly drag head on one cylinder and it would feel tighter than it was when adjusting.
I've run some pretty nasty cams and this system always works whether it's mild or wild. Since it only happens on one cylinder..something is happening there.
JIM
They are shaft mount rockers. Nothing rubbing or binding as far as I can see. The only thing it could be is an issue with the cam grind. The only other thing I can think of is excessive cam bearing clearance. The cam is moving in the bore. But if that were the case I would think I would notice this elsewhere.
They are shaft mount rockers. Nothing rubbing or binding as far as I can see. The only thing it could be is an issue with the cam grind. The only other thing I can think of is excessive cam bearing clearance. The cam is moving in the bore. But if that were the case I would think I would notice this elsewhere.
The cam is solid shaft. so I would not even consider the bearing clearance. Do it while it is hot. I have the angled feeler gauges and it is feel thing on how tight you can slide them in and out. It is not that big of thing to be off compared to the next guy setting them + or - a few thous..
many years ago cams were way wide lash like .030 and they chewed up push rod tips modern SR cams are .008-.012 lash You only loose a little lift being loose or tight you loose some noise
They are shaft mount rockers. Nothing rubbing or binding as far as I can see. The only thing it could be is an issue with the cam grind. The only other thing I can think of is excessive cam bearing clearance. The cam is moving in the bore. But if that were the case I would think I would notice this elsewhere.
The cam does flex from spring pressure. Is the lobe, or lobes closest to the one in question at a fairly high lift so that there is enough spring pressure to cause the cam to deflect increasing the lash?
I am running solid roller cam with a fairly aggressive cam. I am using the EO/IC method to adjust. This states that when the exhaust valve begins to open, the intake lifter is on the base circle. I set the cold lash on the intake rocker just as the exhaust valve on cylinder 8 started to close to 0.015. I then moved on to cylinder 4 to adjust the intake rocker there just as the exhaust started to open. This is where it gets weird, at this point the exhaust valve for cylinder #8 was almost all the way open so I thought I would recheck the lash assuming it should still be 0.015 but was shocked to see it was 0.020! It increased by .005". I did the same thing on cylinder 4 and it did not change from one position to the other. This is a new engine. Not even broken yet fully other than some engine dyno runs. What would cause this? I will check the others as I go.
I have always set them at TDC @ .003" less than specs call for to compensate for the ramp. As the lash isn't a critical adjustment its plenty close. Its very common for drag racers to adjust theirs several thousands tighter or looser to move the torque band.
The cam does flex from spring pressure. Is the lobe, or lobes closest to the one in question at a fairly high lift so that there is enough spring pressure to cause the cam to deflect increasing the lash?
Yes, the exhaust is at max lift the the intake sees max lash.
The cam does flex from spring pressure. Is the lobe, or lobes closest to the one in question at a fairly high lift so that there is enough spring pressure to cause the cam to deflect increasing the lash?
Is your cam made out of spring steel so it can withstand 1000's of flexing per minute? A cam is supported every few inches and is generally a steel shaft @.900 inch minimum diameter.
From an engineering stand point do you really believe that big of steel rod cam shaft would flex before some little hollow tube push rod?
prove it to me! support a cam shaft on some steel blocks at each cam bearing on a press and apply 600 pounds to a lobe and let me see how much a dial indicator reads?
Is your cam made out of spring steel so it can withstand 1000's of flexing per minute? A cam is supported every few inches and is generally a steel shaft @.900 inch minimum diameter.
From an engineering stand point do you really believe that big of steel rod cam shaft would flex before some little hollow tube push rod?
prove it to me! support a cam shaft on some steel blocks at each cam bearing on a press and apply 600 pounds to a lobe and let me see how much a dial indicator reads?
I just had another thought. Years ago I was using cheaper solid rollers and I had put quite a few miles on the vette. like 5000 to 10,000 a year. Well as luck would have it I blew a head gasket and the motor started misfiring. It was a blessing in disguise. When I took the manifold off I pulled all the roller lifters and several of them were starting to have bad wheel barrings and one was really bad. The wheel had slop in the bearings.
If the wheel could move as it rolls around the cam maybe it could account for a lash change during rotation.
New roller lifters after just a couple of engine dyno pulls? Seems possible. I guess anything is possible at this point.
I would not expect problems with new lifter. I think it was Crower SR lifters that failed on me. To adjust I just draw out 8 circles per side and X them off after adjusting because you can do more than one valve before breaker bar cranking the motor. i just learned how to do it fast between heat races. I only have the stud girdle setup, so I have not really messed with the shaft rocker adjustments.
I'd have to see it change in lash to understand better what is going on
I would not expect problems with new lifter. I think it was Crower SR lifters that failed on me. To adjust I just draw out 8 circles per side and X them off after adjusting because you can do more than one valve before breaker bar cranking the motor. i just learned how to do it fast between heat races. I only have the stud girdle setup, so I have not really messed with the shaft rocker adjustments.
I'd have to see it change in lash to understand better what is going on
Basically, I check the lash for the intake just as the exhaust valve begins to open. If I continue to measure at multiple points in the opening cycle, it will gradually increase to maximum lash at 100% open. So if I set the lash at just open to 0.015", by the time I get to 100% open, the lash will be 0.02". This is only for cyl 8. Cyl 7 increases about 0.003". All the others are more or less the same. Interesting that both cylinders in question are directly across from one another... which is why I thought the cam bearings.
Basically, I check the lash for the intake just as the exhaust valve begins to open. If I continue to measure at multiple points in the opening cycle, it will gradually increase to maximum lash at 100% open. So if I set the lash at just open to 0.015", by the time I get to 100% open, the lash will be 0.02". This is only for cyl 8. Cyl 7 increases about 0.003". All the others are more or less the same. Interesting that both cylinders in question are directly across from one another... which is why I thought the cam bearings.
I really don't believe that the cam shaft can bend during it's rotation. The push rod is tiny in comparison and it would bend.
You think about the V-8 design. The lifters are coming in at a V at any give place in rotation you might have 0 to lets say 600 pounds on all the different lobes and it is only 90 degrees to the shaft at max lift. On the side of the ramp it would be causing twist
This is an old picture of my .680/.714 billet steel SBC I think it is a .960 base circle for rod clearance
This one on the right is another of my own custom design from the lobe profile catalog. Replacing the XE off the shelf on the left
Is your cam made out of spring steel so it can withstand 1000's of flexing per minute? A cam is supported every few inches and is generally a steel shaft @.900 inch minimum diameter.
From an engineering stand point do you really believe that big of steel rod cam shaft would flex before some little hollow tube push rod?
prove it to me! support a cam shaft on some steel blocks at each cam bearing on a press and apply 600 pounds to a lobe and let me see how much a dial indicator reads?
Why do you think they went to 55 and 60 mm cam bearings in high stress engines? It is because the cams flex, and also for a bigger lobe to fit through the bearing journal when the cam is being installed. The valves in my race engines looses on average .030 from the weak checker spring at max lift to the real springs (triple). At .900 lift the spring has over 1200 pounds of pressure, and 400 on the seat. Granted part of that lift loss is actually through the push rod. We have actually tried different pushrods, and they are definitely not all created equal. Why do you think cams break? If they did not flex, they would never break, and yes they are heat treated so they are a little bit like a very rigid piece of spring steel. Multiply the force of all of the valve springs that are compressed on the cam, and you literally have tons of pressure. It would be impossible for them not to flex. BTW your Crank shaft flexes too A LOT. Especially the #4 journal, and it is many times thicker, and stronger than a cam shaft.
I really don't believe that the cam shaft can bend during it's rotation. The push rod is tiny in comparison and it would bend.
You think about the V-8 design. The lifters are coming in at a V at any give place in rotation you might have 0 to lets say 600 pounds on all the different lobes and it is only 90 degrees to the shaft at max lift. On the side of the ramp it would be causing twist
This is an old picture of my .680/.714 billet steel SBC I think it is a .960 base circle for rod clearance
This one on the right is another of my own custom design from the lobe profile catalog. Replacing the XE off the shelf on the left
The pushrod is not being pushed on from the side like the cam is, so it is not going to bend, but they flex also. Think of a hammer pounding a nail. Could the nail take the hammering from the side, and not flex or bend? Heck even the rocker arms break occasionally. How could that happen if they never flexed? Why do you run stud girdles? Aren't they preventing flexing? Look at your cam bearings real close the next time you pull one of your engines apart and you will notice they do not have even wear. They will have more wear on the edges than in the center of the bearing because the cam flexes.
What are you running that requires 1200 pounds open pressure? That is a little far removed from a small block with 5/16th push rods and maybe 600 pounds open. I use the CC high tech .105 wall
I've just never experienced a lash change after setting and then rotating the motor