Steeroids vs VBP Rack attack vs stock
Before anyone posts alignment, YES it is done, tires have been checked for pressure and rotated so that is not the issue, new VBP 460lb coil springs, new global west lower a arms, new 1 1/4 sway bar, new poly bushings on uppers, new ball joints, new PS pump and slave cylinder, new brakes all around pads and rotors.
I have all that done the steering is still wanting. It drives straight and doesn't fight you but when you let go of the wheel it starts turning itself right, not extreme but much past 2 to 3 seconds your in the next lane. There is no pull on the brakes, braking does not affect it whatsoever. Now that I am over the pnuemonia I can go out and check everything that they did while I was sick.
I just put on a new PS pump and slave as the old was leaking everywhere. Getting ready to go out and loosen upper a arm bolts and sway bar bolts as I am thinking the new poly bushings might be bound up since they lowered it after they had tightened all the bolts. Thinking since it was all tightened with no load on it very likely has some poly bushing binding or they didn't adjust the valve control screw after installing the new slave cylinder. Which would be causing my right pull issue.
Before I put on a new gear box or control valve I'd just replace it with Steeroids or VBP Rack Attack. Your opinions on which of the 2 are better or any issues you had installing them. Looks pretty simple installation. I thought that about my Jeep TJ when I went to put a 6" lift on it too, lol! That turned out to be a huge endeavor.







If you are in the left lane and it pulls to the right then try it on a few highways. If it always pull to the right even on a 3 lane highway then you have an issue. Sometimes tires will make it do this so maybe rotate the tires and see if the car behaves the same.






Fewer connections for slop and better steering ratios for a sports car,
If you want it to stop pulling take it to a good shop and have them dial in more caster on the right side but as MotorHead said roads are crowned and grooved so it may not be consistent on all roads.
Neal


This is a direct quote from Bret Voelkel, the owner of Ridetech:
Our system is also not compatible with a rack and pinion system. We chose to use the Borgeson steering box because it offered NO compromise in strength, durability, road feel or steering geometry. Rack and pinion steering is a great system IF the rest of the chassis and suspension is designed around it.[like a new car or an aftermarket chassis] To retro-fit it into an existing chassis can require compromises in all the above mentioned areas that we were not willing to make.
https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums...ech-booth.html
It should already be close so that is why you should only turn it in tiny increments and then drive. Keep adjusting until you are satisfied.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

Adjust the control valve, its probably just your power steering pushing the wheel slightly off centered.
I don't see anything really wrong with the factory steering as long as its in good working condition and adjusted properly.
Last edited by Jason Staley; Jan 24, 2016 at 07:34 PM.






This is a direct quote from Bret Voelkel, the owner of Ridetech:
Quoted from post #43 of this thread:
https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums...ech-booth.html
I believe he is still running the factory C3 suspension so no issues with the rack system.
The statement you quoted is discussing the ridetech suspension,
I had forgotten about the centering adjustment as centryoldracer has sugested, be careful while adjusting it can slam the wheels to one side if turned quickly. I would suggest you read up on how to make these adjustments.
Neal
I believe he is still running the factory C3 suspension so no issues with the rack system.
The statement you quoted is discussing the ridetech suspension,
I had forgotten about the centering adjustment as centryoldracer has sugested, be careful while adjusting it can slam the wheels to one side if turned quickly. I would suggest you read up on how to make these adjustments.
Neal
I'm no alignment specialist but as I'm reading the alignment sheet(what parts I can) and I dont think they are within specs of anything. I have the matching Global west upper a arms coming this week, I'm going to put them in when I put in VBP's 550 coils in and send back their 460 coils. My front end looks like a 4x4 right now.
Last edited by King Lear; Jan 24, 2016 at 08:52 PM.
I believe he is still running the factory C3 suspension so no issues with the rack system.
The statement you quoted is discussing the ridetech suspension,
I had forgotten about the centering adjustment as centryoldracer has sugested, be careful while adjusting it can slam the wheels to one side if turned quickly. I would suggest you read up on how to make these adjustments.
Neal
If you are looking to retain the C3's OEM steering for whatever reason and cheapest route to a noticeable improvement to the OEM system, then hands down, a custom/blueprinted OEM box (NOT a standard rebuilt OEM box) is the way to go. I have a Gary Ramadei rebuilt box and the steering is better than when it was brand new from the factory with Zero play, great feel, and terrific steering response BUT it does still retain the 16:1 factory steering ratio which is a little slow by new car standards. This result is using the blueprinted box with the factory OEM power steering cylinder and PS control valve which have never been touched...probably would be even better when I rebuild those 2 components. The rag joint was replaced in the 90's with a GM Delco unit purchased from a dealer. Cost is Half of the borgeson conversion.
The Borgeson unit has 2 big advantages and probably would be the best upgrade choice for 99% of C3 drivers since this system eliminates the PS control valve and the power steering cylinder (and the rag joint if one chooses). Like I always say, anything that eliminates slop/play in the C3 suspension/steering (think of Heim joint struts rods/ spreader bars, poly upper/lower control arm bushings) will greater improve the steering response/handling/feel of a C3 and the Borgeson box falls in this category. In addition, running PS steering fluid to the Borgeson Box is a much better lubricant than grease in the OEM box. Remember though that the Borgeson box is STILL a recirculating ball steering box like the OEM box but with a 12:1 steering ratio versus the OEM box's 16:1 steering. To me it is the Borgeson steering ratio of 12:1 that is the BIG advantage over the OEM box, not really much of anything else (if the OEM PS valve and PS steering are in good working order like mine). I always wonder if there would be much of difference between a blueprinted/custom rebuilt OEM box IF it came with 12:1 ratio versus the Borgeson's 12:1 ratio...doubt it....Almost no car manufacturer utilizes recirculating ball steering any longer (BMW was using recirculating ball steering up to about 10 years ago, as an example, in their 5 series cars, believe it or not). R&P steering is simply easier to manufacturer, less costly to make, with better steering feel....BUT
As for Rack and Pinion conversions, I am not a fan for a C3 due to the cost, modifications needed to make it fit, and slight benefits over the Borgeson unit along with reduced turning radius (probably best for the track). Cost 50% more than the borgeson conversion.
Hope that helps!
Last edited by jb78L-82; Jan 25, 2016 at 05:26 AM.
It should already be close so that is why you should only turn it in tiny increments and then drive. Keep adjusting until you are satisfied.

Been there, done that........
If you are looking to retain the C3's OEM steering for whatever reason and cheapest route to a noticeable improvement to the OEM system, then hands down, a custom/blueprinted OEM box (NOT a standard rebuilt OEM box) is the way to go. I have a Gary Ramadei rebuilt box and the steering is better than when it was brand new from the factory with Zero play, great feel, and terrific steering response BUT it does still retain the 16:1 factory steering ratio which is a little slow by new car standards. This result is using the blueprinted box with the factory OEM power steering cylinder and PS control valve which have never been touched...probably would be even better when I rebuild those 2 components. The rag joint was replaced in the 90's with a GM Delco unit purchased from a dealer. Cost is Half of the borgeson conversion.
The Borgeson unit has 2 big advantages and probably would be the best upgrade choice for 99% of C3 drivers since this system eliminates the PS control valve and the power steering cylinder (and the rag joint if one chooses). Like I always say, anything that eliminates slop/play in the C3 suspension/steering (think of Heim joint struts rods/ spreader bars, poly upper/lower control arm bushings) will greater improve the steering response/handling/feel of a C3 and the Borgeson box falls in this category. In addition, running PS steering fluid to the Borgeson Box is a much better lubricant than grease in the OEM box. Remember though that the Borgeson box is STILL a recirculating ball steering box like the OEM box but with a 12:1 steering ratio versus the OEM box's 16:1 steering. To me it is the Borgeson steering ratio of 12:1 that is the BIG advantage over the OEM box, not really much of anything else (if the OEM PS valve and PS steering are in good working order like mine). I always wonder if there would be much of difference between a blueprinted/custom rebuilt OEM box IF it came with 12:1 ratio versus the Borgeson's 12:1 ratio...doubt it....Almost no car manufacturer utilizes recirculating ball steering any longer (BMW was using recirculating ball steering up to about 10 years ago, as an example, in their 5 series cars, believe it or not). R&P steering is simply easier to manufacturer, less costly to make, with better steering feel....BUT
As for Rack and Pinion conversions, I am not a fan for a C3 due to the cost, modifications needed to make it fit, and slight benefits over the Borgeson unit along with reduced turning radius (probably best for the track). Cost 50% more than the borgeson conversion.
Hope that helps!
I think a non-assist OEM box probably has great feel, but that wasn't an option for me with a big-block.
If you are looking to retain the C3's OEM steering for whatever reason and cheapest route to a noticeable improvement to the OEM system, then hands down, a custom/blueprinted OEM box (NOT a standard rebuilt OEM box) is the way to go. I have a Gary Ramadei rebuilt box and the steering is better than when it was brand new from the factory with Zero play, great feel, and terrific steering response BUT it does still retain the 16:1 factory steering ratio which is a little slow by new car standards. This result is using the blueprinted box with the factory OEM power steering cylinder and PS control valve which have never been touched...probably would be even better when I rebuild those 2 components. The rag joint was replaced in the 90's with a GM Delco unit purchased from a dealer. Cost is Half of the borgeson conversion.
The Borgeson unit has 2 big advantages and probably would be the best upgrade choice for 99% of C3 drivers since this system eliminates the PS control valve and the power steering cylinder (and the rag joint if one chooses). Like I always say, anything that eliminates slop/play in the C3 suspension/steering (think of Heim joint struts rods/ spreader bars, poly upper/lower control arm bushings) will greater improve the steering response/handling/feel of a C3 and the Borgeson box falls in this category. In addition, running PS steering fluid to the Borgeson Box is a much better lubricant than grease in the OEM box. Remember though that the Borgeson box is STILL a recirculating ball steering box like the OEM box but with a 12:1 steering ratio versus the OEM box's 16:1 steering. To me it is the Borgeson steering ratio of 12:1 that is the BIG advantage over the OEM box, not really much of anything else (if the OEM PS valve and PS steering are in good working order like mine). I always wonder if there would be much of difference between a blueprinted/custom rebuilt OEM box IF it came with 12:1 ratio versus the Borgeson's 12:1 ratio...doubt it....Almost no car manufacturer utilizes recirculating ball steering any longer (BMW was using recirculating ball steering up to about 10 years ago, as an example, in their 5 series cars, believe it or not). R&P steering is simply easier to manufacturer, less costly to make, with better steering feel....BUT
As for Rack and Pinion conversions, I am not a fan for a C3 due to the cost, modifications needed to make it fit, and slight benefits over the Borgeson unit along with reduced turning radius (probably best for the track). Cost 50% more than the borgeson conversion.
Hope that helps!












