When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
From Hot Rod magazine....July 1982. I was 11.
The legendary Traco engineering builds a 427.
This article is interesting in the fact that most of the assembly procedures are exactly how we do them now......and that high dollar components in the short block are not necessary.
Another interesting aspect is the dyno numbers....they compare open and closed chambered heads as well as dual and single plane vintage manifolds.......
For all you vintage motorheads out there....enjoy
thank you,very interesting,he didn't say if they were oval or rect port heads(i guess I could have looked up the # he gave but I'm lazy).His timing #'s seem low 38 cruising (mech+inital+vacuum).
thanks for posting. did you scan that yourself? if so, would you mind scanning the V6 chevette swap? don't laugh, I'd really like to see the article. this is why I buy old car magazines at yard sales, I've got a '69 that has a great article on building a L88 clone and tests the holley 3bbl carbs...cool stuff.
I always wondered if a early fuel injection unit from a small block was ever
Modded and installed on a big block engine and what kind of power would be generated.
Like en early TBI system off a full size truck?
WOuld be cool...they are super reliable and get good mileage.
Very very simple to fix. Looks like a carbed motor with 1 02 sensor had on in my van most reliable vehicle EVER! Slowest too
thanks for posting. did you scan that yourself? if so, would you mind scanning the V6 chevette swap? don't laugh, I'd really like to see the article. this is why I buy old car magazines at yard sales, I've got a '69 that has a great article on building a L88 clone and tests the holley 3bbl carbs...cool stuff.
No...it was sent from a friend.....I remember reading this as a kid though because I was crazy. The V6 Chevette was a viable build.....and GM was nothing but idiots then.....although not as bad as Iaccocas "K" Chrysler...
I would really like to see the 69' article on the L-88 if you can scan it....
Like en early TBI system off a full size truck?
WOuld be cool...they are super reliable and get good mileage.
Very very simple to fix. Looks like a carbed motor with 1 02 sensor had on in my van most reliable vehicle EVER! Slowest too
No I'm thinking, I Rochester Fulie unit from like a 65 or earlier
Yeah in '82 that HP was huge, now if you built a 427ci and it made 530HP you would be looking at what you did wrong.
Yes, modern heads alone with zero changes would net another 50-60 horsepower......stock rec port heads have horrible velocity.
But it is interesting as this is pre-aftermarket era.....it represents what a good 427 could make in a C3 with no outward appearance changes.
Running a LS-6 manifold on this would yield good results.....if not the same.....and be a sneaky runner.
Yeah..."back in the day"....Hot Rod did some good testing. TRACO were the dudes for reliable road racing stuff. Usually weren't chasing ultimate HP....they prided themselves on longevity.
The head swap numbers are interesting. Having done that swap on a few different combos over the years...frankly we didn't see huge differences...even on relatively radical stuff. Don't think we ever felt like we lost power especially when we put closed chambers on a flat top 454 etc. I think I saw about a tenth or so on a nasty mega compression deep 9 second Nova once.
I would love to really see the "pocket porting" job they did. If they blended the throat out to edge of valve seat....that typically KILLS the flow on a set of heads and you'll lose power. 1.88's in a closed chamber head will often do worse also if you don't relieve the chamber around it a good bit. Otherwise it chokes along the wall. And a 427 really doesn't need a 1.88 99% of the time.
But they may have been fine...they did mention opening the seat up to outer edge of valve diameter to maximize area. So that sounds like they were doing what they could..but flow numbers would be good.
Anyway...love those 427's! I was never scared to jump on any comparable 454 (and some not comparable) with mine.
JIM
Last edited by 427Hotrod; May 12, 2016 at 05:23 PM.
No...it was sent from a friend.....I remember reading this as a kid though because I was crazy. The V6 Chevette was a viable build.....and GM was nothing but idiots then.....although not as bad as Iaccocas "K" Chrysler...
I would really like to see the 69' article on the L-88 if you can scan it....
Jebby
I'll try and remember to pull it out and bring to work and scan it.
I had a few chevettes and always wanted to do a 2.8 swap back when I was a kid...supposedly the citations with the V6 were modded to make some decent power, though the first gen Xbody transmissions couldn't handle it...
Yeah..."back in the day"....Hot Rod did some good testing. TRACO were the dudes for reliable road racing stuff. Usually weren't chasing ultimate HP....they prided themselves on longevity.
The head swap numbers are interesting. Having done that swap on a few different combos over the years...frankly we didn't see huge differences...even on relatively radical stuff. Don't think we ever felt like we lost power especially when we put closed chambers on a flat top 454 etc. I think I saw about a tenth or so on a nasty mega compression deep 9 second Nova once.
I would love to really see the "pocket porting" job they did. If they blended the throat out to edge of valve seat....that typically KILLS the flow on a set of heads and you'll lose power. 1.88's in a closed chamber head will often do worse also if you don't relieve the chamber around it a good bit. Otherwise it chokes along the wall. And a 427 really doesn't need a 1.88 99% of the time.
But they may have been fine...they did mention opening the seat up to outer edge of valve diameter to maximize area. So that sounds like they were doing what they could..but flow numbers would be good.
Anyway...love those 427's! I was never scared to jump on any comparable 454 (and some not comparable) with mine.
JIM
A big reason I posted the article is because a lot of folks here are somewhat straddled with using GM components on their engines.....
The biggest limiter is the cylinder heads......especially the rec port jobs......
What is funny is that Ligenfelter was getting about 580-600 horse with oval port stuff about 8 years later.....albeit fully ported.....
It is interesting to me to read this stuff as it can show what one should or should not do when building a "sleeper" rat motor.
Of course you could just paint some Dart heads orange...
here is the article broken up into 7 parts. there are some cool Baldwin Motion ads in the magazine I could scan if anyone wants to see the prices of their stuff back in '69...