Basic question about C3 brakes
This is a test by forum member Jim-AKA "427Hotrod"
Wilwood vs Originals
Here's the article- http://www.carsandparts.com/Articles...e-braking-test
It's a very good read.....here's the numbers- not perfectly scientific
STOCK Calipers-
•151 ft., 2 in. - Nice quick stop to get an idea of how hard I could push it on that surface.
•123 ft., 7 in. - Worked it much harder. No brake lockup or drama.
•118 ft., 3 in. - Back to back. Now I knew I could work it harder.
•109 ft., 5 in. - Hit it hard and kept it right on the edge of lockup. Never could repeat it.
•135 ft., 1 in. - Real hard and locked up front wheels early and rears near the end.
•111 ft., 4 in. - Very similar to test four.
•113 ft., 2 in. - Another good one!
Wilwood-D8-6 and D8-4 calipers
•130 ft., 9 in. - Good feel but sliding at the end.
•129 ft., 6 in. - Nearly identical.
•115 ft., 5 in. - Finding the “sweet spot”.
•109 ft., 4 in. - Maybe the pads are getting “bedded”?
•107 ft., 8 in. - Bang! Best ever!
•109 ft., 11 in. - Still working great!
•109 ft., 3 in. - Did it again!
Not much difference in ultimate braking distance BUT more consistency from the Willwood's.
Going to a 13 or 14 inch front rotor in front would certainly reduce the braking distances on both setups.
The only way to significantly reduce a C3 braking distance beyond the above^ would be wider, sticker tires and/or a caliper with a bigger brake pad making contact with the rotor, the latter option I do not believes exists since even Baer brakes still uses the stock size brake pad (?).
My stock C3 brakes with Performance Friction pads with nominal heat in them along with SS flex brake hoses and 255/45/17 ZR tires is dramatically better than braking with organic pads and 255/60/15 S/T rated tires....
BTW-in 1978, Road and Track magazine recorded 244 ft for the 78 C3 with only 2 cars of all the cars they tested over the prior 2 years beating the brake distances from 80-0 MPH, a Porsche 930 turbo (239ft) and a Ferrari Boxer 512 (242 ft). Pretty impressive for the time...
Like I said in my first post go with DOT 5 (silicone) brake fluid especially if your car sits for a long time. You will lose some pedal feel from my experience but I've not felt it was bad or that the brake performance suffered. DOT 5 is hydrophobic, meaning it repels water. DOT 3, which is most common is hydroscopic, meaning it absorbs water even out of the atmosphere. If you get water in your fluid you will lose breaking power and it will also corrode your components.
Make sure your rotor run-out is good. Too much run-out can cause the piston to come out of the bore causing leaks.
I got my SS sleeved o-ring calipers from VB&P. I too don't trust the normal parts retailers with my old muscle car parts especially brakes. Brakes are your #1 safety device. Don't skimp.
Last edited by theandies; Feb 13, 2017 at 12:20 AM.

But I can tell you from personal experience that going to a bigger rotor with the same caliper definitely improves braking distance from initial braking until impending brake lockup/ABS activation. The rate of deceleration is greater for a given amount of brake pedal pressure. (more clamping force with a bigger rotor). I switched my 01 Pontiac Grand Prix with 200,000 miles on the odometer from stock front brakes (11 inch rotor with single piston sliding caliper) to 01 Impala front 12 inch rotors with no other change (same caliper and pad with 01 impala caliper mounting bracket) and the difference is noticeable. I have upgraded the brake system on 2 other cars as well but these upgrades involved not only bigger rotors (much bigger!) but switching from a single piston floating caliper (to dual piston calipers-more pistons) and a bigger sized brake pad so too many variables with these changes to speak to a bigger rotor change alone.
Those upgrades were:
#1 2008 Chrysler 300 Limited:
Front 12 inch vented rotor/single piston floating caliper: Rear 12 inch solid rotor/single piston floating caliper Changed to Hemi brakes (all parts were available for the Hemi brakes from rock auto and are a bolt on change): About $700 for both front and rear but I could have done the exchange for half that amount if I had not opted for red calipers/brackets and top notch high carbon drilled slotted rotors (centrics).
Front 14 inch vented rotor/Dual piston BIG floating caliper with SS flex hoses/Rear 12 inch VENTED rotor/Same single piston floating caliper. Both brakes used same Performance Friction brake pads.
# 2 1994 mustang GT Convertible:
Front 11 inch vented rotor/single piston caliper: Rear 10 inch solid rotor/Single piston floating caliper.
Changed to Cobra front brakes AND SS flex brakes hoses AND Cobra Master Cylinder: (all parts available from rock auto for a 94 mustang Cobra-about $400 for the front cobra system)
Front Cobra 13 inch vented rotor/Cobra Dual piston floating caliper: Rear-NO Change
Both changes #1 and #2 made the car's brake system feel like a completely different car from the OEM setup. Both cars can now stop NOW! It really was worth the effort on both that previously felt like Fred Flintstone braking even under moderate braking....
BTW-I am still waiting for SOMEONE to make an OEM caliper mounting bracket (to use the OEM stock caliper) to the OEM spindle that will allow the use of a 13/14 inch front rotor...waiting...............I bet if someone sold the bracket and 13 or 14 inch rotors for $200 for the kit, they would sell like hotcakes for those of us with 17/18 inch rims.....ANYONE? DUB?
Last edited by jb78L-82; Feb 13, 2017 at 06:44 AM.
I used them on my 71 and 1980 truck . The truck is going on 7 years. The 71 - 2 years.
I've also used them on friends cars with no issues..
I always flush the system when changing Calipers, this may be a reason they have lasted.
Last edited by BLUE1972; Feb 14, 2017 at 09:45 PM. Reason: spell
I love the Wilwood's. I am not sure why my experience has been different than some others I have read. The brake feel is amazing; It feels more linear than stock (I know nothing changed that should have affected brake feel, but...) . I also got new Wilwood rotors but, kept the stock master cylinder.
The only downside has been that the brake pads are not great in cold weather when you first pull out of the drive way. Other than that, this is one of my favorite upgrades.
2 Years and they are working perfectly.
Last edited by 76 Red Hawg; Feb 14, 2017 at 11:28 PM.
I love the Wilwood's. I am not sure why my experience has been different than some others I have read. The brake feel is amazing; It feels more linear than stock (I know nothing changed that should have affected brake feel, but...) . I also got new Wilwood rotors but, kept the stock master cylinder.
The only downside has been that the brake pads are not great in cold weather when you first pull out of the drive way. Other than that, this is one of my favorite upgrades.
2 Years and they are working perfectly.
My Stock SS Calipers/OEM rotors/OEM Master cylinder with SS flex hoses and Performance Friction pads have great feel, firm but linear braking, and great braking performance especially when warm and from high speed.
2 items will change the feel of any braking system with the SAME components:
Stainless Steel flex brake hoses (they will not expand like rubber hoses under pressure) and brake pads. I put SS flex hoses on my 78 in the early 90's on all 4 calipers as a standalone addition to the brake system...no other changes at that time. When I read folks say that SS hoses really do not do anything, they simply do not know what they are talking about. After the change on the 78, I immediately noticed a difference in the feel and linearity of the brake performance. THEY DO HAVE AN EFFECT.
Second, the type of brake material does have a noticeable effect on brake performance, linearity and feel. Pad materials such aramid, organic, semi metallic, metallic, carbon fiber etc all have different feels and performance. There are big differences in brake feel and performance from different brake pads...they are not like some folks feel about tires...all black and round.
I am not fan of ceramic brakes pads since there initial development was for the mass market brake pads to be quiet, rotor friendly, long lasting, low brake dust.....not for performance. There are some that are decent but many better ones in other materials by far.
I mistakenly switched on my 300 to Wagner Thermo Posi Quiets ceramic on the stock front calipers way back and was shocked how bad the braking was versus the Chrysler OEM pad..ripped them out and went with Performance Friction and have never looked back.
Point is there are lots of variables even with the same components...
Last edited by jb78L-82; Feb 15, 2017 at 05:45 AM.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
I used them on my 71 and 1980 truck . The truck is going on 7 years. The 71 - 2 years.
I've also used them on friends cars with no issues..
I always flush the system when changing Calipers, this may be a reason they have lasted.
I am sure that the standard floating caliper will be fine but on the C3 2 years is way to early to tell about longevity....my VBP SS calipers were all installed by me in 1985 when I was still young...a little sad....
Last edited by jb78L-82; Feb 15, 2017 at 05:56 AM.
My Stock SS Calipers/OEM rotors/OEM Master cylinder with SS flex hoses and Performance Friction pads have great feel, firm but linear braking, and great braking performance especially when warm and from high speed.
2 items will change the feel of any braking system with the SAME components:
Stainless Steel flex brake hoses (they will not expand like rubber hoses under pressure) and brake pads. I put SS flex hoses on my 78 in the early 90's on all 4 calipers as a standalone addition to the brake system...no other changes at that time. When I read folks say that SS hoses really do not do anything, they simply do not know what they are talking about. After the change on the 78, I immediately noticed a difference in the feel and linearity of the brake performance. THEY DO HAVE AN EFFECT.
Second, the type of brake material does have a noticeable effect on brake performance, linearity and feel. Pad materials such aramid, organic, semi metallic, metallic, carbon fiber etc all have different feels and performance. There are big differences in brake feel and performance from different brake pads...they are not like some folks feel about tires...all black and round.
I am not fan of ceramic brakes pads since there initial development was for the mass market brake pads to be quiet, rotor friendly, long lasting, low brake dust.....not for performance. There are some that are decent but many better ones in other materials by far.
I mistakenly switched on my 300 to Wagner Thermo Posi Quiets ceramic on the stock front calipers way back and was shocked how bad the braking was versus the Chrysler OEM pad..ripped them out and went with Performance Friction and have never looked back.
Point is there are lots of variables even with the same components...
Last edited by jb78L-82; Feb 15, 2017 at 09:12 AM.
Last edited by OldCarBum; Feb 15, 2017 at 11:58 AM.
The only way, other than bigger stickier tires, to get shorter braking is by changing the distribution/proportioning valve with an adjustable knee break valve. thats it. period.
My braking system:
Full wildwood big brake kit with 6 piston fronts, all 4 with 14" rotors
SS braided brake lines
Hydroboost booster
Willwood proportioning knee brake valve
Wildwood M/C
Last edited by pauldana; Feb 15, 2017 at 02:42 PM.
Hold a 10 lb. weight out straight and shake it up and down....then imagine your suspension over bumps doing this many times a second.
That and the fact that they are precision machined and brand new.
If you have $1000 bucks this is an awesome upgrade to me.
Jebby
There are clearly benefits to larger rotors for those who are looking for track use. Improved efficiency and better thermal management.
However with a simple pad change you can achieve plenty of braking for the casual weekend racer AND retain the factory 15" wheels.
A swap to D8 pads in the BP20 compound will wake things up under moderate use. A move to Poly A for those with true race rubber will far exceed anything the factory ever offered. *But be hard on rotors under low temps.
Weight wise I won't argue the mass number. Remember also that the aluminum body calipers (especially the clears) will dissipate heat far better than the iron parts. *PC while nice can trap a bit of heat.
For the value vs the iron parts, serviced or not...it's a cost that is hard to argue with. VALUE PRICE























