1969 LT1 Clone
Excellent, thanks, good to know.
Jon
Would it be a good alternative to the parts houses on the east coast. Would you know if they have a catalog?
Jon
Would it be a good alternative to the parts houses on the east coast. Would you know if they have a catalog?
Jon
Matt and Keith at the Corvette Clinic are great guys and very helpful! They have done a great job for me getting parts at or below Ecklers' costs. Even though their store isn't that big, I swear that they could assemble several complete cars of each c1, c2, etc...
I don't think they have a catalog, but if you ask them about a part from anyone else's catalog they know what you are talking about, probably have it, or can get it pretty quick.
Chuck
Other than that, the LT-1 intake was a dual plane and a single plane will make a drastic difference.
"Dual plane manifolds have shown to be more throttle and torque responsive at low and mid range rpm levels than most (but not all) single plane manifold designs." "[A single plane] has drawbacks, particularly as the number of cylinders increase. Intake pulses start to overlap, and that can mean that a cylinder will "rob" the cylinder following it in the firing order of charge- if they are located close to each other in the block."
The stock LT1 dual plane is much better. Especially low/mid range.
In the 1/4 mi, there was little difference, other than you could control wheel spin easier with the LT1 intake. On/off the throttle was more responsive.
The best improvement was the addition of the Holley 750DP.
A common problem with adding performance items is getting the tuning right.
I think I was a couple years before I had it "all".
Good performance, good low end drivability, little gas smell, and not too bad milage.
There are many areas to tune in a Holley, and I don't mean jets. Jets are one of the last things to change.
Barry
I've seen too many guys build up motors with mismatched components that are difficult or near impossible to tune, won't idle below 1200 rpm, and have no power below 4500 rpm. Then they get frustrated when the car doesn't perform up to their expectations. The LT-1 conversion is straightforward and should provide a reasonably streetable motor, but less so than the L-46.
:cheers:

80508 carb that you currently have (if it is a 80508).. This should solve your idle problem and add some power!!
:cheers:
Olivier
[Modified by GrandSportC3, 9:11 PM 10/7/2002]
You are correct I do have the 80508 but I cant return it now. Any other way to improve the performance? I really miss the secondaries opening on the q-jet. :confused:
:cheers:
Olivier
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
I agree with your definition. I will say though that having driven my L46 for many, many miles, I was no less pleased with the streetability of the factory spec LT1. A little more nervous feeling down low, but so eager and willing to be revved up high. Definately a bit more power, but not a huge difference. A well tuned double pumper's instaneous throttle response really wakes it up giving the illusion of even more power.
Minimum of 3.70 gears or a wide ratio trans if lower numerical rear end are much desired with the LT1.
Chuck
After reading them all and calling summit racing which is only 35 miles away. Heres what I'm going to do.
#1 Go with the performer intake (should fit, let me know if it doesnt)
#2 Try the the carb I have now and a softer secondary spring.
#3 If all else fails put it back to original
That should keep me busy for a few weekends and evenings!
I wound up having to go with a 2" drop base and a 2 3/8" element and it's TIGHT!
Bob

So many times I eagerly anticipate the opening of a hood only to be left a bit disappointed. Yours is pure Eye Candy once opened! Nobody will be disappointed.
Chuck

















