When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
the new engine will have a new Performer intake so i will be buying a new gooseneck...
seems like a good time to replace the thermostat...
should i go with a 185* ?
I run a 160 thermostat in my 74 and I like it. Without the AC on it will run at 160 all day in any weather including high 90 degree days. With the AC on it runs about 180 - 195 on hot days. I like the extra margin of cooling that the lower thermostats give. JMHO.
I do not know. It did solve problems of going to 220F in summer heat, now long gone. It is incredibly stable at 195F. And that is what I wanted for my stock engine. Cannot ask for more! Here is my experiment of last summer. http://forums.corvetteforum.com/zerothread?id=366876
I wasn't too concerned about the rating because I figured I'd be up at about 195 no matter what (160, 180, or 195) and that's where it runs.
What I did hope to get, and had absolutely NO LUCK finding, were these, hi-flow, fail in the open position, thermostats . I asked all around, and everyone looked at me like I was an idiot (well, that may be for other reasons :rolleyes: ).
Anyway, if you can find a hi-flow, fail in the open position (I know they've referred to them on TNN car shows), I think that'd be the way to go :yesnod:
Good Luck & let us know what you use and how you like it (thermostats seem to be a really popular item here).
Seriously though, in your opinion what is the optimal temp? Other than the the lubrication problem, I would think colder is better since cooler air holds more O2 allow for greater combustion.
Seriously though, in your opinion what is the optimal temp? Other than the the lubrication problem, I would think colder is better since cooler air holds more O2 allow for greater combustion.
Factory spec is best. Yes, colder intake air is good, to further increase delta T. This is a compromise that must be made, as a hot engine will inadvertently warm the incoming air charge.
Do you guys realize a hotter running engine is more thermodynamically efficient (ie more power)? In a heat cycle, energy transfer comes from delta T.
Yes, but my old body isn't thermodynamically efficient and sitting behind an engine that's running 220 degrees in the summer isn't my idea of fun. I like my car to run cool so I run a 160 thermostat but that's my preference. Most people would probably be more comfortable with a 180. I don't see the advantage of going higher than that. Besides, how efficient can a 25 or 30 year old engine be that still uses a carb.
Seriously though, in your opinion what is the optimal temp? Other than the the lubrication problem, I would think colder is better since cooler air holds more O2 allow for greater combustion.
Factory spec is best. Yes, colder intake air is good, to further increase delta T. This is a compromise that must be made, as a hot engine will inadvertently warm the incoming air charge.
[Modified by Turbo-Jet, 12:24 PM 10/15/2002]
But most of us are not running factory spec cars. Probably not much diff either way.