When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
When running on a good track - my 60' times are anywhere from 1.676 to 1.75's... So far I haven't had any issues with my rear end but I'm really concerned that it's going to break if I continue running that kind of 60' times... I wonder how much more my stock rear end will be able to take. Is there any cheaper way to upgrade the rear end to be able to handle consistently that kind of abuse or am I worrying too much and the stock rear should be able to handle all that power. I'm really happy with the output of my engine and don't really want to increase it's output because of concerns that the rear end won't be able to handle it (inclusing bearings and spindles etc...) Are there any cheaper alternatives to upgrade the rear end? For now - I'm not thinking in putting a Ford 9 inch into the car....
Any suggestions?
GrandSport, do you reminder the video that was on the forum about 6 months ago that showed one of the guys at the line and his back tires both going a different direction. ( away from the car at a high rate of speed)
GrandSport, do you reminder the video that was on the forum about 6 months ago that showed one of the guys at the line and his back tires both going a different direction. ( away from the car at a high rate of speed)
I haven't seen this video... So - what happened? Did the rear end break??
Are you concerned about the carrier, the half-shafts or both?
I have to be honest...I am downright _shocked_ at the wimpy driveshaft in this '69 BB I'm picking up. I mean it is tiny (diameter, I'm talking about). Looks like a bomb waiting to go off, IMHO.
Someone out there has to make some upgraded half-shafts for these cars. They do for the C5s.
From: Exiled to Richmond, VA - Finally sold my house in Murfreesboro, TN ?? Corner of "Bumf*&k and 'You've got a purdy mouth'."
CI 6-7-8 Veteran
CI-VIII Burnout Champ
St. Jude Donor '06-'10, '13
Re: Rear end question.. (WA 2 FST)
Someone out there has to make some upgraded half-shafts for these cars. They do for the C5s.
That's because most of the C5's 1/2 shafts can't handel the stock HP in that car. Good traction one day and your 1/2 shafts or rear end housing can go :seeya .
Are you concerned about the carrier, the half-shafts or both?
I have to be honest...I am downright _shocked_ at the wimpy driveshaft in this '69 BB I'm picking up. I mean it is tiny (diameter, I'm talking about). Looks like a bomb waiting to go off, IMHO.
Someone out there has to make some upgraded half-shafts for these cars. They do for the C5s.
I'm not too concerned about the halfshafts. I had the halfshaft U-joints upgraded to the best ones available. I'm more concerned about the differential itself.
Someone out there has to make some upgraded half-shafts for these cars. They do for the C5s.
That's because most of the C5's 1/2 shafts can't handel the stock HP in that car. Good traction one day and your 1/2 shafts or rear end housing can go :seeya .
On the Bradenton track I get maximum traction (no spin at all) and the whole drivetrain survived it so far... I know that anything can break on my setup... so I wonder what the alternatives are to upgrade the rear end... I'm not too concerned about my halfshafts. They look pretty strong on my 68'...
Wes, upgraded halfshafts and driveshafts are available from a bunch of places. Inland Empire, Dennys Driveshaft, Tom's. The stock driveshaft is definitely small, but everyone seems to break the posi, u-joints, and/or inner/outer yokes first. I've never heard of a driveshaft failure (except for the u-joint), but everyone with a stronger than stock rear usually upgrades the driveshaft at the same time. The main problem with our axles is the cost to significantly upgrade. It's a pretty strong stock rear, but to upgrade the strength of the entire assemly is a $4k proposition.
Olivier, I doubt anyone will tell you a stock rear and 1.6 60' times are a good match ;) Eveyone is scared of your post... :lol: If it were reliable, we wouldn't need Tom's 30 spline setup.
When running on a good track - my 60' times are anywhere from 1.676 to 1.75's...
I get those same kind of 60' times when it's running. And I'm pretty concerned about breakiing stuff--yokes, u-joints, diff., etc.--because I've still got 3.08 gears in the rear. That's gotta be putting hellacious stress on things in the driveline--kind of like taking a 10-speed bike, putting it in 10th gear and tring to start from a dead stop as quickly as you can. I really need 3.70s or 3.90s to relieve some of the stress.
Wes, upgraded halfshafts and driveshafts are available from a bunch of places. Inland Empire, Dennys Driveshaft, Tom's. The stock driveshaft is definitely small, but everyone seems to break the posi, u-joints, and/or inner/outer yokes first. I've never heard of a driveshaft failure (except for the u-joint), but everyone with a stronger than stock rear usually upgrades the driveshaft at the same time. The main problem with our axles is the cost to significantly upgrade. It's a pretty strong stock rear, but to upgrade the strength of the entire assemly is a $4k proposition.
Olivier, I doubt anyone will tell you a stock rear and 1.6 60' times are a good match ;) Eveyone is scared of your post... :lol: If it were reliable, we wouldn't need Tom's 30 spline setup.
$4k for a rear end upgrade sounds pretty expensive.. I might just hope to get lucky to break nothing.... If I really want to spend big $$$ I will go with a Ford 9 inch rear end... I'm not too concerned about driveshaft and halfshafts.. My halfshafts - who have to take most stress - look pretty strong... Also - all my U-joints are pretty new and I don't think that any of those components are going to break.. I think that I will just continue racing and hope that nothing will break...
When running on a good track - my 60' times are anywhere from 1.676 to 1.75's...
I get those same kind of 60' times when it's running. And I'm pretty concerned about breakiing stuff--yokes, u-joints, diff., etc.--because I've still got 3.08 gears in the rear. That's gotta be putting hellacious stress on things in the driveline--kind of like taking a 10-speed bike, putting it in 10th gear and tring to start from a dead stop as quickly as you can. I really need 3.70s or 3.90s to relieve some of the stress.
Changing your gears should also improve your ET's :yesnod: :yesnod: .
I was actually concerned about my gearing being too short... (3.27 first gear with 3.55 rear) but I'm really happy with my setup after racing it a couple of times...
Believe it or not, our rear ends are tougher than you think. The weakest link is the IRS set up, but the 12 bolt "chunk" is pretty brute. My father told me when he raced his '69 427 (4spd and 4.11) gears from '69-'72 he never tore his rear end. He and his buddy (also with a '69) were at the track every weekend. There is a local guy at the track (The Louisiana Crew can vouch for this) with his '69 383 that runs 9.5's. He LAUNCHES on Nitrous, pulls the front end a couple feet off the ground. He told me he has the HD U-joints and HD rear end cover and the rest is stock. I didn't buy it so I asked my friend who is his best friend and he said the same thing.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.