'68 steering rag joint spacing - is this a problem?
The gap between the steering shaft and steering box, which rag joint must straddle, looks to me like it could be a problem. The steering shaft clamp of the rag joint is at the very end of the shaft. Is there anything adjustable about this shaft on a non-tilt setup? I see some sort of clamp upstream on the steering shaft, but don't know its purpose.
Do you think this is a problem?
Here is a photo:
Jim Shea seems to be a steering god - his braindump library can be found here (I just downloaded the zip format, then unzipped - and my computer has not crashed yet): https://archive.org/details/corvettefaq
sounds like my column may be a bit collapsed, and it might be possible for me to "draw it down..." we shall see
As an example, I've attached Jim Shea overview docs on 67 & 68 non-tilt steering column diagnosis, repair, etc. This is just one of hundreds of documents in the zip archive - it may not be the latest/greatest, whatever, but it has put me miles ahead of where I was at the start of today.
Sounds like I've got one of those "one-of-a-kind" transition year situations with my 68 steering column.
Last edited by h16; Apr 1, 2025 at 05:21 PM. Reason: wrong attachment first go-round





Its a 68 only box on a C3 but its the same as a c2 box
All 63-82 boxes have the 360* groove in the worm ball screw input end. The 63-E69 used a full 3/4-36 spline, the L69-82 use a 3/4- 30 spline with a D-Flat.
The 68 box used the same round input as the previous years, the cover is iron and used from 66-68. The 63 cover was different, the 64 mid 66 covers were the same buy different from the 66-68. The 63 Grand Sport was completely different.
The box shown in the rag joint picture has an iron cover, the input groove can't be seen since the rag and pinch bolt are in place.










