When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
adam, i've heard the same thing. i've wondered about running this on the street too. i've thought about giving it a try but figured it's not worth the hastle when i'm already running .080" gap. who's running this on the street and how long? any adverse affects?
i've never heard of this either. the page above says:
"Side Gapping" has been a well kept secert for many years in the racing circles. this will substantially increase horsepower, torque and fuel economy with no sacrafice to your wallet.
sounds good to me :yesnod: but is it ok to do it to a street car :confused:
Did this to my drag camaro in the mid eightys. Lost a tenth in the quarter mile but it caused the electrode to wear quicker and I was replacing plugs too often (headers were a pain).
You will most likely only see a gain if you have a very high compression and huge domes where the actual flame front shrouding by the electrode is substancial. In a somewhat normal engine side gapping is a nice thing to do and allows you to accurately set the gap. Rremember the gap is the shortest distance between the 2 poles, like this:
Well yes they do give a bit more power but do shorten the life of them considerably. mainly make a set and use them for racing only. Many people actually go a step further and cut the electrode off at the bend, and then just push the side in closer. This way yo have a complete open kernal. As for those 4 electrod crap spark plugs. Why waste the money? you are only blocking more of the kernal from the mixture. And it's not going to spark to all 4 points. Even if you managed to have it spark to all 4, That would not be a good thing. All that means is the the current is 4 times weaker when jumping the gap. In reality the spark is only going to jump the closest gap and it will always be that one. If it mis fires, It's not going to go to the next closest. cause after all. if it's not going to make it past the closest gap, why would it make it past the second closest. All in all, A good set of NGK's should do the trick.
I have done test with this on the dyno on both mid-compression motors (10-1 to 12-1) and on high compression motors (13-1 to 16-1) and could not find any measurable horsepower differences. This seems to be an old urban ledgend that won't go away.
Many people actually go a step further and cut the electrode off at the bend, and then just push the side in closer. This way yo have a complete open kernal.
Yes, that was in my 2nd pic.. that does not appear :mad I hate this resize thing.
There is some value in 4 electrodes - the spark will jump to the closest gap, TRUE.
But a sharper edge is closer than a rounded discharged away edge.
So, with 4 electrodes, you have 4 times the contact area of a single side gapped
electrode. But as to the effectiveness of the spark, others have said no.