Dyno results are in





502 honed .004 0ver to 4.47 bore
SRP 17cc dome 10.2 to 1 Pistons
zero deck
Clay Smith solid flat tappet 304 Adv. 258 at .050 .615 lift on a 108 LSA installed on a 105.25 I.C.
Jesel shaft rockers 1.8 intake and 1.7 exhaust
AFR 315 CNC heads 121 cc chambers
Holley Strip Dominator Intake
950 HP carb
Eagle +.250 H-beam rods with the L19 rod bolts
GM forged crank, internal balance and knife edged
Compression ratio came right in at 10 to 1. I wanted to go a little higher but was talked out of it.
I am going off of memory here as I will pick up the motor Monday and the dyno sheets, but the best pull with my carb was 605 at 6300rpm and 586 lb ft at 4900 I believe although the curve was really flat with 500 lbs as low as 2500 I believe. Just for the hell of it we threw a 1050 Dominator on it and it picked up 15 and 15. One interesting thing was when he tried his standard dyno 800 cfm holley that he knows runs good and has been blueprinted, it equalled the best we pulled out of my carb so he thinks the 950 hp is just an 830 or so given the 850 baseplate and 750 main body. His dyno is by his own admission very conservative but very accurate in repeatability. All pulls were made at 200 degree oil temps and 180 water temps. I bought a Victor Junior but realized quickly it would not fit so I sent it back without running it although I would have liked to. The back measured the same as the Strip Dominator but was too high in the front. He was very complimentary of the AFR heads and thinks it is the best out of the box head going right now and he has done many big blocks. He said this engine should be plenty to scare me with for a long time. I can't say enough about how great this man was to deal with and how impressive his track record and his facility are. If anyone needs work in the New York Tri-state area I highly recommend this guy. His name is Bill Carlquist at Carlquist Competition Engines in Oakville CT. I will post some charts and some exhaust testing results we did when I get the sheets. Joe (Flareside) this was for you buddy. Bill.






Yes, I have info from a Holley insider that the 950 HP really flows in the 830 range, just like the dyno guy said. Still a good carb, though, even if it doesn't flow the advertised numbers.
You better get busy installing that monster this week. Everybody at the Mahwah show will be looking for you next Sunday. :D
Those are great numbers! I will be VERY interested to see your chassis dyno figures as well.
Just the base 305 heads picked me up 100rwhp over the stock rect. port heads on my 454 HO (also installed a hi-rise intake and slighly bigger cam...although its awfully small).
<<Just the base 305 heads picked me up 100rwhp over the stock rect. port heads on my 454 HO (also installed a hi-rise intake and slighly bigger cam...although its awfully small).>>
That is good. AFR said it shouldn't be a proplem, but just wanted to hear from someone who'd done it. Thanks
-Frank
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Do you really think there is that much difference from the factory rectangular heads? I can hardly believe I would have made nearly 600rwhp with that change alone. It is something for me to think about.
69ttop502's numbers are very impressive. It will be very interesting to see what numbers it makes at the rear wheels. The forum is great cataloguing a rather extensive dyno reference library.
Chuck
[Modified by Chuck Harmon, 8:29 PM 10/19/2003]





[Modified by Flareside, 1:01 PM 10/20/2003]
Do you really think there is that much difference from the factory rectangular heads? I can hardly believe I would have made nearly 600rwhp with that change alone. It is something for me to think about.
Given the fact it picked up TQ and HP across the entire rev-range, I'd have to say it's definitely the heads (more flow with a smaller runner which = more port velocity). The other combo was completely maxxed out. Perfect A/F ratio (13.0:1) at WOT (334rwhp/384rwtq). This combo isn't, and it still picked up 100rwhp. It runs fine, so I didn't bother leaning it out...it boils the tires anyway, and plus it was during the summer. I would venture now that its cooler, even with no jet change (since it was rich 11.5:1 during the summer tune) I am ~450rwhp or so. Maybe more.
All this with low CR (9.5:1), and a relatively tiny cam for a "hot-rod" motor. Chances are good had I gone with the bigger hyd. roller AFR suggested (242/242, .615" lift), I'd be withing sniffing distance of you. :)
I don't know how these compare to your heads, but you have really good GM factory heads. Mine were plain-Jane, iron rect. port, box stock.
Also, realize that I am making peak HP at only 5600rpm (I shift ~6000). With the bigger cam to bump the peak rpm up to ~6200+, I honestly think 470+rwhp would be what it would see. But, I don't plan to mess with it right now. I'm just enjoying the heck out of the car, especially in this fall weather. :D
I think its a testament to the head design that I have power from off-idle to "whenever I shift". TQ anywhere, which is a function of engine power as I only have 3.36s in the rear. There is no point at which the "cam comes on" and starts to make power. It makes power _everywhere_. With a low CR motor like I have, I'd say its primarily the heads. Yes, I'm still running a dual-plane, but I was before, too.







Jim, thanks, gonna but those baffles to good use now.
Budman, hopefully I am ready for it. I have beefed up the driveline with the 30 spline axles and beefy halfshafts with 1480 u-joints. Also put in a new suspension and steering components so outside of taking the body off I have done all I can do. Thanks everyone, Bill.
Joe, I will see you on Sunday, where can I find you as I assume your car won't be there?














